Endophytic bacterial isolate diversity in suboptimal field rice and their potential in sheath blight control

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

NUR PRIHATININGSIH
RUTH FETI RAHAYUNIATI
HERU ADI DJATMIKO
PUJI LESTARI
NUR KHOLIDA WULANSARI
I KETUT WIDNYANA
KOKO DWI SUTANTO

Abstract

Abstract. Prihatiningsih N, Rahayuniati RF, Djatmiko HA, Lestari P, Wulansari NK, Widnyana IK, Sutanto KD. 2024. Endophytic bacterial isolate diversity in suboptimal field rice and their potential in sheath blight control. Biodiversitas 25: 3359-3367. Rice root endophytic bacteria from suboptimal fields rice are beneficial for controlling plant pathogens. The present research aimed to characterize morphology and biochemical properties, identify secondary metabolites of rice root endophytic bacteria and evaluate their potential as biocontrol for sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani. The present study focused on five endophytic bacteria, specifically Bacillus sp., with white colonies, rod-shaped cells, Gram-positive characteristics, and catalase-positive. These bacteria were selected from rice root samples due to their potential as antagonists against the pathogenic fungus R. solani. The inhibition potential of endophytes against R. solani was determined by measuring the radius of the fungal colony in the presence of the endophytic bacteria isolates. Among them, NP KR4 showed the highest inhibition percentage of 46.00 ± 6.25%, which was attributed to the antibiosis mechanism causing hyphal swelling. A molecular test using the 16S rRNA gene was conducted to determine the isolates' genetic identity. Comparing the gene sequences with those in the genetic database, it was found that NP A5, NP KR4, and NP KR7 isolates were similar to B. subtilis strain 2JKP676166, although with a few base pair differences. NP A6 exhibited a close relation to B. subtilis strain YT2 HQ143571, while NP SB3 was identified as B. subtilis subsp. stercoris strain EG1265MN704551. Further analysis of the endophytic bacteria's secondary metabolites through Gas Chromatography and Mass Spectroscopy revealed the presence of alkaloids, phenols, alcohols, and fatty acids. Among the isolates, NP KR4 demonstrated the highest biocontrol effectiveness against sheath blight, with an efficacy of 58.74%. Overall, the results indicated that the rice root endophytic bacteria isolated from suboptimal fields possess multiple contemporary traits, including antifungal activity and strain-specific differences as Bacillus subtilis. These findings suggest promising prospects for developing bio-fungicide formulations to promote sustainable rice production.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Asmaliyah, Lukman AH, Mindawati N. 2016. Pengaruh Teknik Persiapan Lahan Terhadap Serangan Hama Penyakit Pada Tegakan Bambang Lanag. J. Penelit. Hutan Tanam. 13, 139–155.
Djatmiko HA, Prihatiningsih N, Lestari P. 2023. Bioprospection of single and a consortium endophytic bacteria of suboptimal field rice isolates as biocontrol of rice bacterial leaf blight pathogens. Biodiversitas 24, 2710–2715. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240524
Herdyastuti N, Raharjo TJ, Mudasir M, Matsjeh S. 2010. Chitinase and Chitinolytic Microorganism?: Isolation, Characterization and Potential. Indones. J. Chem. 9, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.21580
Jamali H, Sharma A, Roohi, Srivastava AK. 2020. Biocontrol potential of Bacillus subtilis RH5 against sheath blight of rice caused by Rhizoctonia solani. J. Basic Microbiol. 60, 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201900347
Khairah M, Mubarik NR, Manaf LA. 2023. Bacterial selection and characterization of chitinase enzyme from bacteria controlling Fusarium proliferatum. Biodiversitas 24, 1926–1933. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240370
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Lestari P, Prihatiningsih N, Djatmiko HA. 2017. Partial biochemical characterization of crude extract extracellular chitinase enzyme from Bacillus subtilis B 298. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 172, 012041. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/172/1/012041
Marwan H. 2017. Kemampuan Bakteri Endofit dalam Mengendalikan Penyakit Rebah Kecambah dan Layu Sclerotium (Sclerotium rolfsii) pada Kedelai. Jpt J. Prot. Tanam. (Journal Plant Prot. 1, 52. https://doi.org/10.25077/jpt.1.2.52-61.2017
Munif A, Wiyono S, Suwarno S. 2012. Isolation of Endophytic Bacteria from Upland Rice and Its Role as Biocontrol Agents and Plant Growth Inducer. J. Fitopatol. Indones. 8, 57–64.
Muthukumar A, Venkatesh A. 2013. Plant Pathology & Microbiology Exploitation of Fungal and Endophytic Bacteria for the Management of Leaf Blight of Ribbon Plant 4, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000209
Prihatiningsih N, Arwiyanto T, Hadisutrisno B, Widada J. 2020. Characterization of Bacillus spp. from the rhizosphere of potato granola varietiy as an antibacterial against Ralstonia solanacearum. Biodiversitas 21, 4199–4204. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210934
Prihatiningsih N, Asnani A, Djatmiko HA. 2021. Extracellular protease from Bacillus subtilis B315 with antagonistic activity against bacterial wilt pathogen (Ralstonia solanacearum) of chili. Biodiversitas 22, 1291–1295. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220327
Prihatiningsih N, Djatmiko HA, Lestari P. 2022. Antagonistic feature displayed by endophytic bacteria consortium for control rice pathogens. J. Hama dan Penyakit Tumb. Trop. 22, 154–161. https://doi.org/10.23960/jhptt.222154-161
Tamura K. 1992. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+C-content biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9, 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040752
Wang HK, Xiao RF, Qi W. 2013. Antifungal activity of Bacillus coagulans TQ33, isolated from skimmed milk powder, against Botrytis cinerea. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 51, 78–83.
Yadav A, Yadav K. 2021. Plant Growth-Promoting Endophytic Bacteria and Their Potential to Improve Agricultural Crop Yields. Microb. Interv. Agric. Environ. Vol. 3 Soil Crop Heal. Manag. 1–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9084-6