Comprehensive evaluation and economic analysis in some barley genotypes under soil salinity

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
DOI https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g070104
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023)
Section
Articles

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

SAMAH A. MARIEY ♥
Barley Research Department, Field Crops Research Institure, Agricultural Research Centre – Giza. 9 Gamma street, Giza, 12619 Cairo, Egypt
MAHA A. EL-BIALY
Water Management Research Institure, National Water Research Center, Egypt. Al-Kanater Al-Khairia – P.O. Box 13621 Kalubia, Egypt
RANIA A. KHEDR
Crop Physiology Research Department, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre – Giza. 9 Gamma street, Giza, 12619 Cairo, Egypt
EMAN N. MOHAMED
Seed Technology Research Department, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre – Giza. 9 Gamma street, Giza, 12619 Cairo, Egypt
AHMED M. I. MELEHA
Water Management Research Institure, National Water Research Center, Egypt. Al-Kanater Al-Khairia – P.O. Box 13621 Kalubia, Egypt
ISMAEL A. KHATAB
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University. Qism Kafr El-Shaikh, Kafr el-Sheikh 33516, Egypt

Abstract

Abstract. Mariey SA, El-Bialy MA, Khedr RA, Mohamed EN, Meleha AMI, Khatab IA. 2023. Comprehensive evaluation and economic analysis in some barley genotypes under soil salinity. Asian J Agric 7: 20-33. Soil salinity is one of the abiotic stresses that cause a significant reduction in barley production. Understanding the phenotypic and genetic diversity among Barley genotypes is necessary to improve barley salt tolerance. Herne comprehensive sets of morph-physiological, grain quality traits and Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers combined with economic analysis were done to determine the phenotypic and genetic variation of eight barley genotypes under salinity stress during seasons 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. High genetic variation was observed among studied genotypes for all measured traits. Salinization caused a significant increase in (Sodium content, soluble carbohydrate content, and crude protein content %) in sensitive genotypes (Giza 132 and line 1). SSRs markers generated clear patterns with high polymorphism with 31 alleles by an average of 2.07 alleles per locus. Out of 15 SSR markers, nine (Bmac 0209, Bmag 0011, Bmag 125, Bmac 0871, Bmag 770, Bmac 701, Bmag 0387, Bmac316, and Bmag 0009) were highly useful in distinguishing tolerant and sensitive Barley genotypes. Soil salinity decreased the benefit-cost ratio for Giza 123,136 and 137, which appear beneficial as salt-tolerant cultivars. Those cultivars had low reductions for almost studied traits and had the highest grain yield production due to increasing the farmer's income under salt affect area.

2017-01-01

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Acosta-Motos JR, Ortuño MF, Bernal-Vicente A, Diaz-Vivancos P, Sanchez-Blanco MJ, Hernandez JA. 2017. Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy 7 (1): 18. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy7010018.
Akhter MS, Noreen S, Mahmood S, Athar H, Ashraf M, Alsahli AA, Ahmad P. 2021. Influence of salinity stress on PSII in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes, probeb chlorophyll a fluorescence. J King Saud Univ Sci 101: 239.
Al Lawati A, Nadaf SK, AlSaady NA, Al Hinai SA, Almamari AR, Al Maawali AA. 2021. Genetic diversity of Omani barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm. Open Agric 6: 628. DOI: 10.1515/opag-2021-0038.
Al-Ashkar I, Alderfasi A, Romdhane W, Seleiman MF, El-Said A Rania, Abdullah A. 2020. Morphological and genetic diversity within salt tolerance detection in eighteen wheat genotypes. Plants 9: 287. DOI: 10.3390/plants9030287.
Allel D, Ben-Amar A, Badri M, Abdelly C. 2019. Evaluation of salinity tolerance indices in North African Barley accessions at reproductive stage. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 55: 61-69. DOI: 10.17221/50/2017-CJGPB.
Amiryousefi A, Hyvönen J, Poczai P. 2018. iMEC: Online Marker Efficiency Calculator. Appl Plant Sci 6 (6): e1159. DOI: 10.1002/aps3.1159.
AOAC. 2000. Official Method of Analysis (17th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Bakari MS, Abdallah JM, Hella JP. 2018. Adaptation strategies of small-scale agriculture production to climate change impacts in Micheweni, Tanzania. Trop Drylands 3: 60-75. DOI: 10.13057/tropdrylands/t030205.
Bartlett MS. 1937. Properties of sufficiency and statistical tests. J R Stat Soc Ser A 160: 268. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1937.0109.
Brbaklic L, Trkulja D, MikicS, Mirosavljevic M, Momcilovic V, Dudic B, Procházková, L, Acin V. 2021. Genetic diversity and population structure of Serbian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) collection during a 40-year long breeding period. Agronomy 11: 118. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11010118.
Chapman HD, Pratt PE. 1978. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. University of California Division of Agriculture Science, Priced Publication, Oakland.
Cimmyt. 1988. From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economic work book "DF: 31-33.
Dell’Aversana E, Hessini K, Ferchichi S, Fusco GM, Woodrow P, Ciarmiello LF, Abdelly C, Carillo P. 2021. Salinity duration differently modulates physiological parameters and metabolites profile in roots of two contrasting barley genotypes. Plants 10: 307. DOI: 10.3390/plants10020307.
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Focus 12: 13-15. DOI: 10.2307/2419362.
Duis M, Hamilton G, Robers JK, PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugar and related substances. Anal Chem 28: 350-356. DOI: 10.1021/ac60111a017.
Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA). 2016. Egypt State of The Environment Report Ministry. Egypt.
El Sabagh A, Hossain A, Islam MS, Barutcular C, Hussain S, Hasanuzzaman M, Akram T, Mubeen M, Nasim W, Fahad S, Kumar N, Meena RS, K?z?lgeçi F, Y?ld?r?m M, Ratnasekera D, Saneoka H. 2019. Drought and salinity stresses in Barley: Consequences and mitigation strategies. Austral J Crop Sci 13: 810-820. DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.19.13.06.p1286.
El-Akhdar A, Abd El-sattar M, Amer K, Kumamaru T. 2016 .Genetic diversity and association analysis among Egyptian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes with different adaptations to saline conditions analyzed by SSR markers. Austral J Crop Sci 10 (5): 637-645. DOI: 10.21475/ajcs.2016.10.05.p7331.
FAO. 2008. FAO land and Plant Nutrition Management Service. FAO, Rome.
FAOSTAT. 2019. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat
Gonzalez L, Gonzalez-Vilar M. 2001. Determination of relative water content. In: Reigosa MJ (eds). Handbook of Plant Ecophysiology Techniques. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Grover A, Sharma PC. 2016. Development and use of molecular markers: Past and present. Crit Rev Biotechnol 36: 290-302. DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2014.959891.
Hammami Z, Qureshi AS, Sahli A, Gauffreteau A, Chamekh Z, Ben Azaiez FE, Ayadi S, Trifa Y. 2020. Modeling the effects of irrigation water salinity on growth, yield and water productivity of barley in three contrasted environments. Agronomy 10: 1459. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10101459.
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1-9.
Hossain MS. 2019. Present scenario of global salt affected soils, its management and importance of salinity research. Intl Res J Biol Sci 1: 1-3.
Isayenkov SV, Maathuis FJ. 2019. Plant salinity stress: Many unanswered questions remain. Front Plant Sci 10: 80. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00080.
Khatab IA, El-Mouhamady ABA, Mariey SA. 2021. Comprehensive Selectio criteria for high-yielding bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) hybrids under salinity stress. Egypt J Bot 61 (3): 709-730. DOI: 10.21608/ejbo.2021.65333.1637.
Lin YP, Wu MC, Charng YY. 2016. Identification of a chlorophyll dephytylase involved inchlorophyll turnover in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28 (12): 2974-2990. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00478.
Mahlooji M, Sharifi RS, Razmjoo J, Sabzalian MR, Sedghi M. 2018. Effect of saltstress on photosynthesis and physiological parameters of three contrasting barley genotypes. Photosynthetica 56 (2): 549-556. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-017-0699-y.
Mariey SA, Ahmed KR, Agwa AME, Farid MA, Serag AM. 2019. Biochemical and molecular genetic markers associated with salt stress tolerance in Egyptian barley cultivars. Egypt J Plant Breed 23: 183-197.
Mariey SA, Farid MA, Khatab IA. 2016. Physiological and molecular characterization of some Egyptian barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars for salt tolerance. Egypt J Genet Cytol 45: 367-382. DOI: 10.21608/ejgc.2016.9588.
Mariey SA, Ghareeb ZE, Shahein AMEA, Meleha AMI, Gomaa HA, Rady AMS, Khatab IA. 2022b. Genetic diversity analysis among some barley genotypes using multivariable and molecular markers under different levels of soil salinity stress. Asian J Plant Soil Sci 7 (1): 219-236.
Mariey SA, Khaffagy AE, Aiad MA, Khatab IA, Ghareeb ZE. 2022a. The influence of the salinity and weed control treatments on some barley cultivars and its associated weeds. J Glob Agric Ecol 13 (2): 26-50.
Mariey SA, Khedr RA, Zayed BA, Elakhdar A. 2017. Genetic variability among Egyptian barley varieties for agro morphological traits under saline soil condition. Egypt J Plant Breed 21: 577-593. DOI: 10.12816/0046352.
Mariey SA, Mohamed AM, Ali HG. 2018. Effect of salinity stress on physiological and biochemical traits of Barley cultivars. Intl J Environ 7: 65-77.
Mariey SA, Mohamed EN, Zeinab GE, Engy AZS. 2021. Genetic diversity of Egyptian barley using agro–physiological traits, grain quality and molecular markers. Curr Sci Intl 10: 58-71.
Mehta G, Muthusamy SK, Singh GP. 2021. Identification and development of novel saltr esponsive candidate gene based SSRs (cg-SSRs) and MIR gene based SSRs (mir-SSRs) in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). Sci Rep 11: 2210. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81698-3.
Metsalu T, Vilo J. 2015. Clust Vis: A web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using Principal Component Analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res 43: 566. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv468.
Moran R. 1982. Formulae for determination of chlorophyll pigments with N,N Dimethylformamid. Plant Physiol 69: 1376-1381. DOI: 10.1104/pp.69.6.1376.
Mwando E, Han Y, Angessa TT, Zhou G, Hill CB, Zhang XG, Li C. 2020. Genome wide association study of salinity tolerance during germination in barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Front Plant Sci 11: 1-15. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00118.
Nadeem M, Tariq MN, Amjad M, Sajjad M, Akram M, Imran M, Kulikov D. 2020. Salinity induced changes in the nutritional quality of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Agrivita J Agric Sci 42: 1-12. DOI: 10.17503/agrivita.v42i1.2273.
Naguib MI. 1962. Arapid colorimetric procedure for the estimation of free and conjugated sugars in plant extracts. Zucker 15: 35.
Narimani T, Toorchi M, Tarinejad AR, Mohammadi SA, Mohammadi H. 2020. Physiological and biochemical evaluation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salinity. J Agric Sci Technol 22 (4): 1009-1021.
NDSU. 2015. Soil Health and Land Management. www.ndsu.edu/soilhealth/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Corn-salinity_6-13-16.pdf. 6-13-16.
Nei M, Li WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 76: 526-5273. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269.
Peter LP, Young VR. 1980. Nutritional Evaluation of Protein Foods. The United Nations University, Japan.
Pour-Aboughadareh A, Sanjani S, Nikkhah-Chamanabad H, Mehrvar mr, Asadi A, Amini A. 2021. Identifcation of salt tolerant barley genotypes using multiple traits index and yield performance at the early growth and maturity stages. Bull Natl Res Cent 45: 11. DOI: 10.1186/s42269-021-00576-0.
Rajeswari S, Sood N, Gokhale ST, Subramanian R. 2019. Assessing salt-stress tolerance in barley. Appl Genet 95: 714-722.
Saade S, Maurer A, Shahid M, Oakey H, Schmöckel-Sandra M, Negrão S, Pille K, Tester M. 2016. Yield-related salinity tolerance traits identifed in a Nested Association Mapping (NAM) population of wild barley. Sci Rep 6: 32586. DOI: 10.1038/srep32586.
Saleh-Amal AH, Abd El-Hamid Hoda A, Shaddad MA, E El-badry N. 2017. Assessment the growth and some chemical contents of three barley cultivars under salt stress. J Environ Sci 46: 227-238.
Sallam A, Amro A, EL-Akhdar A, Dawood MFA, Kumamaru T, Stephen Baenziger P. 2018. Genetic diversity and genetic variation in morpho-physiological traits to improve heat tolerance in spring barley. Mol Biol Rep 45: 2441-2453. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-018-4410-6.
Sally T, Peavy Shirley GB, Ruth NV, Hogben D. 1986. OMNITAB 80: An interpretive system for statistical and numerical data analysis. NBS Special Public 701: 1-2. DOI: 10.6028/NBS.SP.701.
Sorkhi F. 2020. Effect of salt stress on physiology and agronomy characteristics of barley cultivars. Agric Eng Intl 22: 69-75.
Varshney RK, Marcel TC, Ramsay L. 2007. A high density Barley microsatellite consensus map with 775 SSR loci. Theor Appl Genet 114: 1091-1103. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-007-0503-7.
Younis A, Ramzan F, Ramzan Y, Zulfiqar F, Ahsan M, Lim KB. 2020. Molecular markers improve abiotic stress tolerance crops: A review. Plants 9: 1374. DOI: 10.3390/plants9101374.
Zeeshan M, Lu M, Sehar S, Holford P, Wu F. 2020. Comparison of biochemical, anatomical, morphological, and physiological responses to salinity stress in wheat and barley genotypes deferring in salinity tolerance. Agronomy 10: 127. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10010127.
Zhu J, Fan Y, Shabala S, Li C, Lv C, Guo B, Xu R, Zhou M. 2020. Understanding mechanisms of salinity tolerance in barley by proteomic and biochemical analysis of near-isogenic lines. Intl J Mol Sci 21: 1516. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041516.