Forage grass management using treated cassava wastewater in Kalasin, Thailand

Main Article Content

KHEMIKA CHINNABUTR
SUPAPORN POUNGCHOMPU

Abstract

Abstract. Chinnabutr K, Poungchompu S. 2025. Forage grass management using treated cassava wastewater in Kalasin, Thailand. Asian J Agric 9: 645-652. At present, both small and large-scale farmers have been widely using forage grass production for animal feed, which can effectively reduce the cost of animal production and improve feed availability throughout the year. This study evaluates the economic benefits of using treated cassava wastewater for forage grass production in Kalasin Province, Thailand. Surveys were conducted during the 2021-2022 crop season with 90 farmers, including 50 users with treated wastewater and 40 farmers dependent on other water sources. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and an independent t-test. The results showed that farmers using treated wastewater obtained higher yields (36,253.882 kg/ha) and lower production costs (578.352 US$/ha) compared with non-users (25,035.751 kg/ha; 731.244 US$/ha). Net returns were also significantly higher among users (1,089.327 US$/ha or 0.030 US$/kg) than non-users (470.472 US$/ha or 0.019 US$/kg). Statistical analysis showed that yield (t = 3.19, p<0.05), cost (t = 1.79, p<0.01), and profit (t = 4.29, p<0.01) had significant differences. In addition, treatment was found to reduce fertilizer costs for farmers using wastewater by 150.50 US$/ha and enable them to sustain pastures into the dry season. This result clearly indicates that wastewater reuse is both cost-effective and environmentally friendly. This not only minimizes input costs and increases profitability, but also serves as a nature-based solution in support of year-round forage production in sustainable cassava-based farming systems.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CHINNABUTR, K. ., & POUNGCHOMPU, S. . (2025). Forage grass management using treated cassava wastewater in Kalasin, Thailand. Asian Journal of Agriculture, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g090232

References

Abou Jaoude L, Kamaleddine F, Said RB, Mohtar RH, Dbaibo R, Yanni SF. 2025. Treated wastewater reuse and its impact on soil properties and potato and corn growth. Sci Total Environ 958: 178130. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178130.

Achi CG, Kupolati WK, Snyman J, Ndambuki JM, Fameso FO. 2024. Investigating the effects of biochars and zeolites in anaerobic digestion and co-digestion of cassava wastewater with livestock manure. Front Energy Res 12: 1386550. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2024.1386550.

Aguilar-Torrejón JA, Balderas-Hernández P, Roa-Morales G, Barrera-Díaz CE, Rodríguez-Torres I, Torres-Blancas T. 2023. Relationship, importance, and development of analytical techniques: COD, BOD, and, TOC in water—An overview through time. SN Appl Sci 5 (4): 118. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-023-05318-7.

Alfaro M, Hube S, Salazar F, Beltrán I, Rodriguez M, Ramírez L, Saggar S. 2022. Soil greenhouse gas emissions in different pastures implemented as a management strategy for climate change. Agronomy 12 (5): 1097. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12051097.

Basheer S, Wang X, Farooque AA, Nawaz RA, Pang T, Neokye EO. 2024. A review of greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soil. Sustainability 16 (11): 4789. DOI: 10.3390/su16114789.

Bezerra MG, Silva GGD, Difante GDS, Emerenciano JV, Oliveira EM, Oliveira LED. 2017. Cassava wastewater as organic fertilizer in 'Marandu' grass pasture. Rev Bras Eng Agric Ambient 21 (6): 404-409. DOI: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n6p404-409.

Bureau of Animal Nutrition Development. 2021. Said Information on Production of Animal Feed Supplies for Fiscal Year 2017-2021. https://www.nutrition.dld.go.th/nutrition/index.php/2016-04-10-06-41-04/2174-2560-2564. [22 October 2022]

Capstaff NM, Miller AJ. 2018. Improving the yield and nutritional quality of forage crops. Front Plant Sci 9: 535. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00535.

Costa AG, Cova AMW, Souza LDS, Xavier FADS, Correia MRS, Gonçalves DR, Almeida WFD. 2020. Use of cassava wastewater in Capsicum chinense production. Pesqui. Agropecu Trop 50: e64756. DOI: 10.1590/1983-40632020v5064756.

dos Santos AL, Castro ALS, Salomon KR, de Souza TS, Vich DV. 2022. Global research trends on anaerobic digestion and biogas production from cassava wastewater: A bibliometric analysis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 97 (6): 1379-1389. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6976.

Elahi E, Abid M, Zhang L, Alugongo GM. 2017. The use of wastewater in livestock production and its socioeconomic and welfare implications. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24: 17255-17266. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9263-3.

Fuglie K, Peters M, Burkart S. 2021. The extent and economic significance of cultivated forage crops in developing countries. Front Sustain Food Syst 5: 712136. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.712136.

Holzknecht A, Land M, Dessureault-Rompré J, Elsgaard L, Lång K, Berglund Ö. 2025. Effects of converting cropland to grassland on greenhouse gas emissions from peat and organic-rich soils in temperate and boreal climates: A systematic review. Environ Evid 14 (1): 1. DOI: 10.1186/s13750-024-00354-1.

IBM Corp. Released. 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp., Armonk, NY.

Kalasin Provincial Agricultural Office. 2022. Kalasin Province Information 2022. https://kalasin.doae.go.th/province/. [10 March 2024]

Kearney M, O'Riordan EG, Byrne N, Breen J, Crosson P. 2023. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in pasture-based dairy-beef production systems. Agric Syst 211: 103748. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103748.

Manouchehrinejad M, Sahoo K, Kaliyan N, Singh H, Mani S. 2020. Economic and environmental impact assessments of a stand-alone napier grass-fired combined heat and power generation system in the southeastern US. Intl J Life Cycle Assess 25: 89-104. DOI: 10.1007/s11367-019-01667-x.

Okunade DA, Adekalu KO. 2017. Physico-chemical analysis of contaminated water resources due to cassava wastewater effluent disposal. Eur Intl J Sci Technol 2 (6): 75-84.

Olukanni DO, Olatunji TO. 2018. Cassava waste management and biogas generation potential in selected local government areas in Ogun State, Nigeria. Recycling 3 (4): 58. DOI: 10.3390/recycling3040058.

Pereira JM, Aquino ACMDS, Oliveira DCD, Rocha G, Francisco AD, Barreto PLM, Amante ER. 2016. Characteristics of cassava starch fermentation wastewater based on structural degradation of starch granules. Cienc Rural 46: 732-738. DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20150632.

PCD [Pollution Control Department]. 2020. Industrial effluent strandard. Notification of the Ministry of Industry, Thailand. http:// www.pcd.go.th.

Putra B, Gopar RA, Surachman M, Darmawan IWA, Fanindi A, Sawen D, Hau DK. 2025. A systematic review of bibliometric analyses: Climate change impacts on resilience, adaptation, and sustainability of pastures. Theor Appl Climatol 156: 1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00704-025-05387-1.

Velasco-Muñoz JF, Aznar-Sánchez JA, López-Felices B, Román-Sánchez IM. 2022. Circular economy in agriculture. An analysis of the state of research based on the life cycle. Sustain Prod Consum 34: 257-270. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.09.017.

Ungureanu N, Vl?du? NV, Biri? S?, Ionescu M, Gheorghi?? NE. 2025. Municipal solid waste gasification: Technologies, process parameters, and sustainable valorization of by-products in a circular economy. Sustainability 17 (15): 6704. DOI: 10.3390/su17156704.