Predicting soybean seed longevity under ambient storage through multivariate viability and vigor analysis

Main Article Content

MOHAMED TAHA ZALAMA
AHMED A. A. LEILAH

Abstract

Abstract. Zalama MT, Leilah AAA. 2025. Predicting soybean seed longevity under ambient storage through multivariate viability and vigor analysis. Asian J Agric 9: 702-711. The current study examined the longevity of the soybean seed cultivar (Giza 111) under ambient storage conditions in Dakahlia, Egypt, from July 2023 to June 2024. Three lots of seed from different sources were observed for up to 360 days to predict seed longevity and to determine storage parameters for warehouse management. Initial seed quality was estimated, then a simplified viability equation, v = Ki - (1/?) P, was applied to predict seed longevity during the storage period. Significant differences were noticed among seed lots. Seed lot 01 (Legumes Department, FCRI, ARC) exhibited the best seed viability, with the highest storage index (? = 120 days), longest half-viability period (P50 = 151 days), and slowest deterioration rate (tg? = -0.0008), indicating superior vigor during storage. In contrast, seed lots 02 and 03, obtained from the private sector, showed reduced viability, with Lot 03 exhibiting the lowest (? = 90 days, tg? = -0.011, P50 = 79 days). Linear regression showed seed viability decline rates differed: Lot 01 (slowest, -2.50), Lot 02 (moderate, -2.73), and Lot 03 (fastest, -3.34), confirming relative deterioration speeds. Pearson correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between probit viability and seed vigor indices, including germination (r = 0.946), accelerated aging (r = 0.945), seedling dry weight (r = 0.925), and vigor index II (r = 0.935). Quantitative data further supported the correlation between probit viability and vigor parameters. This study demonstrated that a simplified viability equation effectively predicted the longevity and vigor of soybean seeds from different sources stored under ambient conditions in Dakahlia, Egypt. Significant differences in viability and deterioration rates among seed lots underscore the equation's value for practical seed storage monitoring, improved ambient storage management, and enhanced seed inventory control and quality preservation through accurate performance prediction.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ZALAMA, M. T. ., & LEILAH, A. A. A. . (2025). Predicting soybean seed longevity under ambient storage through multivariate viability and vigor analysis. Asian Journal of Agriculture, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjagric/g090238

References

Abati J, Zucareli C, Brzezinski C, Lopes I, Krzyzanowski F, Cardoso M, Henning F. 2022. Water absorption and storage tolerance of soybean seeds with contrasting seed coat characteristics. Acta Sci Agron 44: e56495. DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.53096.

Agresti A. 2012. Categorical Data Analysis. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken.

Almakas A, Elrys AS, Desoky EM, Al-Shuraym LA, Alhag SK, Alshaharni MO, Alnadari F, NanNan Z, Farooq Z, El-Tarabily KA, Zhao T. 2025. Enhancing soybean germination and vigor under water stress: The efficacy of bio-priming with sodium carboxymethyl cellulose and gum arabic. Front Plant Sci 15: 1475148. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1475148.

Andreoli C. 1997. The simplified equation to predict storability of maize and soybean seeds. Inf Abrates Bras 7 (3): 16.

Bagateli JR, Dörr CS, Schuch OB, Meneghello GE. 2019. Productive performance of soybean plants originated from seed lots with increasing vigor levels. J Seed Sci 41 (2): 151-159. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1545v41n2199320.

Baributsa D, Baoua I. 2022. Hermetic bags maintain soybean seed quality under high relative humidity environments. J Stored Prod Res 96: 101952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2022.101952.

Basso DP, Hoshino-Bezerra AA, Sartori MM, Buitink J, Leprince O, Silva EAA. 2018. Late seed maturation improves the preservation of seedling emergence during storage in soybean. J Seed Sci 40 (2): 185-192. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1545v40n2191893.

Batista TB, Perissato SM, Rego CHQ, Oliveira GRF, Henning FA, Silva EAA. 2021. Is it possible to estimate longevity through the analyses used to measure the initial physiological potential in soybean seeds? J Seed Sci 43: e202143024. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1545v43249697.

Bernal-Lugo I, Leopold AC. 1998. The dynamics of seed mortality. J Exp Bot 49 (326): 1455-1461. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/49.326.1455.

Bharathi Y, Sujatha P, Pallavi M, Razia SJ, Jaganmohan RP, Ramesh M. 2024. Effect of packaging materials on seed quality parameters during storage in soybean (Glycine max L.) seed harvested at physiological maturity stage in offseason. Intl J Adv Biochem Res 8 (10S): 1255-1264. DOI: 10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i10So.2705.

Chandra S, Taak Y, Rathod DR, Yadav RR, Poonia S, Sreenivasa V, Talukdar A. 2020. Genetics and mapping of seed coat impermeability in soybean using an inter-specific population. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26 (11): 2291-2299. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-020-00906-y.

Chen X, Zhong Z, Tang X, Yang S, Zhang Y, Wang S, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zheng X, Zhang Y, Feng X. 2024. Advancing PAM-less genome editing in soybean using CRISPR-SpRY. Hortic Res11 (8): uhae160. DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhae160.

Coradi PC, Lima RE, Padia CL, Alves CZ, Teodoro PE, Cândido ACS. 2020. Soybean seed storage: Packaging technologies and conditions of storage environments. J Stored Prod Res 89: 101709. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2020.101709.

De Vitis M, Hay FR, Dickie JB, Trivedi C, Fiegener R. 2020. Seed storage: Maintaining seed viability and vigor for restoration use. Restor Ecol 28 (S3): S249-S255. DOI: 10.1111/rec.13174.

Ellis RH, Roberts EH. 1980. Improved equations for the prediction of seed longevity. Ann Bot 45 (1): 13-30. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085797.

Ellis RH. 2022. Seed ageing, survival, and the improved seed viability equation: forty years on. Seed Sci Technol 50 (Supplement 1): 1-20. DOI: 10.15258/sst.2022.50.1.s.01.

FAO. 1999. Chapter 7: Seed Storage - A Guide to Forest Seed Handling. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.

Fenollosa E, Jené L, Munné-Bosch S. 2020. A rapid and sensitive method to assess seed longevity through accelerated aging in an invasive plant species. Plant Methods 16: 64. DOI: 10.1186/s13007-020-00607-3.

Finney DJ. 1952. Probit analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York.

Finney DJ. 1971. Probit Analysis. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, New York,

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

Harrington JF. 1972. Seed storage and longevity. In: Kozlowski TT (eds). Seed Biology. Academic Press, New York. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-395605-7.50009-0.

Hay FR, Davies RM, Dickie JB, Merritt DJ, Wolkis DM. 2022. More on seed longevity phenotyping. Seed Sci Res 32 (3): 144-149. DOI: 10.1017/S0960258522000034.

Hozayn M, Amal EL-Mahdy AA, Zalama MT. 2018. Magneto-priming for improving germination, seedling attributes, and field performance of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under salinity stress. Middle East J Agric Res 7 (3): 1006-1022.

ISTA. 2024. International Rules for Seed Testing, Chapter 2, i-2-44 (52). DOI: 10.15258/istarules.2023.02.

Koskosidis A, Khah EM, Pavli OI, Vlaschostergios DN. 2022. Effect of storage conditions on seed quality of soybean (Glycine max L.) germplasm. AIMS Agric Food 7 (2): 387-402. DOI: 10.3934/agrfood 2022025.

Lehner A, Mamadou N, Poels P, Côme D, Bailly C, Corbineau F. 2008. Changes in soluble carbohydrates, lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant enzyme activities in the embryo during ageing in wheat grains. J Cereal Sci 47 (3): 555-565. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.017.

Lima JJP, Buitink J, Lalanne D, Rossi RF, Pelletier S, Silva EAA, Leprince O. 2017. Molecular characterization of the acquisition of longevity during seed maturation in soybean. PLoS ONE 12 (7): e0180282. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180282.

Mahlangu AZ, Truter M, Kritzinger Q. 2024. Effect of storage conditions on soybean seed quality produced by smallholder farmers within two districts of Gauteng, South Africa. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 125 (1): 85-92. DOI: 10.17170/kobra-202403129758.

Matera TC, Pereira LC, Braccini AL, Krzyanowski FC, Scapim CA, Piana SC, Marteli DCV, Pereira RC, Ferri GC, Suzukawa AK. 2019. Accelerated aging test and its relationship to physiological potential of soybean seeds. J Seed Sci 41 (3): 301-308. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1545v41n3212746.

Muhamad K, Nauli K, Wicaksono FY, Anas. 2024. Seed longevity of soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars under lightless storage. Malays Appl Biol 53 (2): 47-54. DOI: 10.55230/mabjournal.v53i2.276.

Nagel M, Börner A. 2010. The longevity of crop seeds stored under ambient conditions. Seed Sci Res 20 (1): 1-12. DOI: 10.1017/S0960258509990213.

Prado JP, Krzyzanowski FC, Martins CC, Vieira RD. 2019. Physiological potential of soybean seeds and its relationship to electrical conductivity. J Seed Sci 41 (4): 407-415. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1545v41n4214988.

Ranganathan U, Groot SPC. 2023. Seed longevity and deterioration. In: Dadlani M, Yadava DK (eds). Seed Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-5888-5_5.

Rao PJ, Pallavi M, Bharathi Y, Priya PB, Sujatha P, Prabhavathi K. 2023. Insights into mechanisms of seed longevity in soybean: A review. Front Plant Sci 14: 1206318. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1206318.

Righetti K, Vu JL, Pelletier S, Vu BL, Glaab E, Lalanne D, Pasha A, Patel RV, Provart NJ, Verdier J, Leprince O, Buitink J. 2015. Inference of longevity-related genes from a robust coexpression network of seed maturation identifies regulators linking seed storability to biotic defense-related pathways. Plant Cell 27: 2692-2708. DOI: 10.1105/tpc 15.00632.

Roberts EH. 1973. Predicting the storage life of seeds. Seed Sci Technol 1: 499-514.

Sarkar D, Rakshit A, Al-Turki AI, Sayyed RZ, Datta R. 2021. Connecting bio-priming approach with integrated nutrient management for improved nutrient use efficiency in crop species. Agriculture 11 (4): 372. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11040372.

Silva MF da, Soares JM, Martins MS, Silva FC dos S, Silva FL da, Silva LJ da. 2024. Artificial aging for predicting the storability of soybean seeds via GGE biplot. J Seed Sci 46: e202446001. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1545v46270874.

Sim J, Kuwabara C, Sugano S, Adachi K, Yamada T. 2023. Recent advances in the improvement of soybean seed traits by genome editing. Plant Biotechnol 40 (3): 193-200. DOI: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.23.0610a.

Singh J, Paroha S, Mishra RP. 2016. Effect of storage on germination and viability of soybean (Glycine max L.) and niger (Guizotia abyssinica) seeds. Intl J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 5 (7): 484-491. DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2016.507.053.

Surki AA, Sharifzadeh F, Afshari RT. 2012. Effect of drying conditions and harvest time on soybean seed viability and deterioration under different storage temperatures. Afr J Agric Res 7 (36): 5118-5127. DOI: 10.5897/AJAR12.060.

Tekrony DM, Nelson C, Egli DB, Egli GM. 1993. Predicting soybean seed deterioration during warehouse storage. Seed Sci Technol 21: 127-137.

Tekrony DM. 1995. Accelerated ageing test. In: Van De Venter HA (eds). Seed Vigour Testing Seminar. ISTA, Copenhagen.

Vijayan SS, Nagarajappa N, Ranjitha HP. 2023. Seed coat composition in black and white soybean seeds with differential water permeability. Plant Biol 25 (6): 935-943. DOI: 10.1111/plb.13551.

Zalama MT, El-Azab AAS, Leilah AAA. 2024. Effect of natural extracts during storage conditions on seed quality and yield performance of soybean Cultivar Giza 22. Asian J Agric Hortic Res 11 (4): 158-171. DOI: 10.9734/ajahr/2024/v11i4351.

Zalama MT, Leilah AAA. 2019. Assessment of faba bean productivity based on sowing dates, seed sizes, and seed priming treatments. J Plant Prod 10 (12): 995-1003. DOI: 10.21608/JPP.2019.71520.

Zalama MT. 2021. Viability studies on longevity of onion seeds under various seed storage conditions. Intl J Agric Biol Sci 5: 62-75. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.5141607.

Zhou G, Zhang F, Wu S. 2016. Improvement on the Ellis and Roberts viability model. Turk J Agric: Food Sci Technol 4: 321-329. DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v4i5.321-329.495.