Diversity of rice landraces and taxonomic strategies in Kanekes folk-biology as insights for biocultural conservation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Mulyanto D, Iskandar BS, Aulia SAZ, Ruswanda AS, Sobarna C, Iskandar J. 2026. Diversity of rice landraces and taxonomic strategies in Kanekes folk-biology as insights for biocultural conservation. Asian J Ethnobiol 9 (1): y090114. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjethnobiol/y090114. The Kanekes of Western Java, Indonesia, one of the last indigenous communities practicing upland rice-based agroforestry, hold a rich folk-taxonomic system that reflects the connection between language and biological knowledge. Rapid infrastructure development has increased interactions with the outside world, putting pressure on cultural and linguistic resilience. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 43 local expert informants, aged 40-70 years. Data were then analyzed through folk taxonomic classification and linguistic analysis of the naming structures. The Kanekes people named 89 upland rice landraces using a binomial structure, with the second lexeme serving as a descriptor. About 46.06% of identified landraces used other plants’ names as descriptors, many of which also held cultural significance in the ethnobotany of the Kanekes. Other descriptors included terms related to the shape, quality, and color of the rice plant parts. This study shows that the widespread use of cross-species metaphors in upland rice nomenclature serves as an important cognitive process for intraspecific classification, connecting sensory perception, ecological familiarity, and cultural memory. These findings enhance ethnobiological models of folk taxonomy by illustrating how metaphorical descriptors integrate landraces within wider ecological and linguistic networks. This case further exemplifies that biocultural conservation relies on preserving crop diversity and maintaining the ecological and linguistic frameworks that facilitate knowledge transmission and varietal identification.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Addi YW, Zhang Y, Ding XY, Guo CA, Wang YH. 2022. A study of the plant folk nomenclature of the Yi people in Xiaoliangshan, Yunnan Province, China, and the implications for protecting biodiversity. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 18 (1): 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00504-0.
Akhalkatsi M, Otte A, Togonidze N, Bragvadze T, Asanidze Z, Arabuli G, Chikhelidze N, Mazanishvili L. 2017. Agrobiodiversity and genetic erosion of crop varieties and plant resources in the Central Great Caucasus. Ann Agrar Sci 15 (1): 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aasci.2016.12.002.
Alam O, Gutaker RM, Wu CC, Hicks KA, Bocinsky K, Castillo CC, Acabado S, Fuller D, Guedes JADA, Hsing YI, Purugganan MD. 2021. Genome analysis traces regional dispersal of rice in Taiwan and Southeast Asia. Mol Biol Evol 38 (11): 4832-4846. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab209.
Almeida MJ, Pinheiro de Carvalho MÂA, Barata AM, Magos Brehm J, Maxted N. 2023. Crop landraces inventory for Portugal. Genet Resour Crop Evol 70 (4): 1151-1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-022-01492-6.
Aparicio JCA, Voeks RA, Funch LS. 2021. Mixtec taxonomy: Plant classification, nomenclature, and identification in Oaxaca, Mexico. Ethnobot Res Appl 21: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.21.24.1-13.
Arifiani KN, Wijaya CKW, Irfan A, Septiasari A, Iskandar J, Iskandar BS, Partasasmita R, Setyawan AD. 2019. Review: Local wisdom of Baduy people (South Banten, Indonesia) in environmental conservation. Asian J Ethnobiol 2 (2): 92-107. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjethnobiol/y020204.
Atran S, Medin DL. 2008. The Native Mind and the Cultural Construction of Nature: Life and Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7683.001.0001.
Bellwood P. 2011. The checkered prehistory of rice movement southwards as a domesticated cereal-from the Yangzi to the equator. Rice 4: 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12284-011-9068-9.
Berlin B, Breedlove DE, Raven PH. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. Am Anthropol 75 (1): 214-242. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1973.75.1.02a00140.
Berlin B. 1976. The concept of rank in ethnobiological classification: Some evidence from Aguaruna folk botany. Am Ethnol 3 (3): 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1976.3.3.02a00010.
Berlin B. 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400862597.
Blust R. 2013. The Austronesian Languages. Asia-Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, Canberra.
Britwum K, Demont M. 2022. Food security and the cultural heritage missing link. Glob Food Sec 35: 100660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100660.
Cabanting RMF, Perez LM. 2016. An ethnobotanical study of traditional rice landraces (Oryza sativa L.) used for medical treatment in selected local communities of the Philippines. J Ethnopharmacol 194: 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.10.021.
Casañas F, Simó J, Casals J, Prohens J. 2017. Toward an evolved concept of landrace. Front Plant Sci 8: 145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00145.
Crystal E, Whittlesey P. 2004. The role of rice in Southeast Asia. Edu About Asia 9 (3): 50-55. https://doi.org/10.65959/eaa.622.
da Silva RRV, Gomes LJ, Albuquerque UP. 2014. Methods and techniques for research on the supply chains of biodiversity products. In: Albuquerque UP, Cruz da Cunha LVF, Lucena RFP de, Alves RRN (eds.). Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. 1st ed. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_21.
De Haan S, Bonierbale M, Ghislain M, Núñez J, Trujillo PG. 2007. Indigenous biosystematics of Andean potatoes: Folk taxonomy, local descriptors and nomenclature. Acta Hortic 745: 89-134. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.745.4.
Deb D. 2017. Folk rice varieties, traditional knowledge and nutritional security in South Asia. In: Poyyamoli G (eds.). Agroecology, Ecosystems, and Sustainability in the Tropics. Studera Press, Delhi.
Deng Z, Kuo SC, Carson MT, Hung HC. 2022. Early Austronesians cultivated rice and millet together: Tracing Taiwan’s first neolithic crops. Front Plant Sci 13: 962073. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.962073.
Dougherty JWD. 1978. Salience and relativity in classification. Am Ethnol 5 (1): 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1978.5.1.02a00060.
Dyer GA, López-Feldman A, Yúnez-Naude A, Taylor JE. 2014. Genetic Erosion in Maize’s Center of Origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111 (39): 14094-14099. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407033111.
Ellen RF. 1993. The Cultural Relations of Classification: An Analysis of Nuaulu Animal Categories from Central Seram. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511470530.
Ellen RF. 2008. The Categorical Impulse: Essays in the Anthropology of Classifying Behavior. Berghahn Books, Oxford.
Espinosa MM, Bieski IGC, Martins DTO. 2014. Sampling in ethnobotanical studies of medicinal plants. In: Albuquerque UP, Cruz da Cunha LVF, Lucena RFP de, Alves RRN (eds.). Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology. 1st ed. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8636-7_13.
Eticha F, Sinebo W, Grausgruber H. 2010. On-farm diversity and characterization of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) landraces in the highlands of West Shewa, Ethiopia. Ethnobot Res Appl 8: 25-34. https://doi.org/10.17348/era.8.0.25-34.
Ficiciyan A, Loos J, Sievers-Glotzbach S, Tscharntke T. 2018. More than yield: Ecosystem services of traditional versus modern crop varieties revisited. Sustainability 10 (8): 2834. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082834.
Franco FM, Hidayati S, Ghani BAA, Ranaivo-Malancon B. 2015. Ethnotaxonomic systems can reflect the vitality status of indigenous languages and traditional knowledge. Indian J Tradit Knowl 14 (2): 175-182.
Franco FM, Narasimhan D. 2009. Plant names and uses as indicators of knowledge patterns. Indian J Tradit Knowl 8 (4): 645-648.
Franco FM. 2021. Intellectualist premise of folk names support their restoration in formal taxonomy. Ethnobot Res Appl 21: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.21.26.1-3.
Fuller DQ. 2011. Pathways to Asian civilizations: Tracing the origins and spread of rice and rice cultures. Rice 4: 78-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12284-011-9078-7.
Gepts P. 2023. Biocultural diversity and crop improvement. Emerg Top Life Sci 7 (2): 151-196. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20230067.
Ghimire SK, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y. 2010. Ethnobotanical classification and plant nomenclature system of high altitude agro-pastoralists in Dolpo, Nepal. Bot Orient 6: 56-68. https://doi.org/10.3126/botor.v6i0.2912.
Haile B, Tesfaye B, Olango TM. 2022. Indigenous biosystematics of enset (Ensete ventricosum [Welw.] Cheesman) in its center of origin and diversity, Southwest Ethiopia: Folk nomenclature, classification, and descriptors. Econ Bot 76 (4): 382-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-022-09553-8.
Hammarström H, Forkel R, Haspelmath M, Bank S. 2024. Glottolog 5.0. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10804357.
Heidhues F, Rerkasem B. 2006. IRRI’s Upland Rice Research. CGIAR Science Council, Rome.
Hidayati S, Franco FM, Suhaimi A. 2022. Folk plant names are condensed forms of traditional knowledge: Case study with the Urang Kanekes of Banten, Indonesia. In: Franco FM, Knudsen M, Hassan NH (eds.). Case Studies in Biocultural Diversity from Southeast Asia. Asia in Transition, Vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6719-0_7.
Hidayati S, Suansa NI, Samin, Franco FM. 2017. Using ethnotaxonomy to assess traditional knowledge and language vitality: A case study with the Urang Kanekes (Baduy) of Banten, Indonesia. Indian J Tradit Knowl 16 (4): 576-582.
Hiepko P. 2006. Eipo plant nomenclature and classification compared with other folk taxonomic systems. Willdenowia 36 (1): 447-453. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.36.36142.
Ishikawa R, Yamanaka S, Fukuta Y, Chitrakon S, Bounphanousay C, Kanyavong K, Tang LH, Nakamura I, Sato T, Sato YI. 2006. Genetic erosion from modern varieties into traditional upland rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) in Northern Thailand. Genet Resour Crop Evol 53 (2): 245-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-004-6132-y.
Iskandar BS, Iskandar J, Mulyanto D, Supriatna J. 2024. Ethnozoological knowledge of diversity, folk taxonomy, and animal hunting among the Baduy in Banten, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 25 (12): 5031-5045. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d251241.
Iskandar BS, Iskandar J, Partasasmita R. 2018. Strategy of the outer Baduy community of South Banten (Indonesia) to sustain their swidden farming traditions by temporary migration to non-Baduy areas. Biodiversitas 19 (2): 453-464. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190212.
Iskandar BS, Iskandar J. 2021. Kawung: Landraces, management, uses, and conservation based on moral versus economic interest among outer Baduy community, South Banten, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 22 (12): 5572-5584. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d221242.
Iskandar J, Ellen R. 1999. In situ conservation of rice landraces among the Baduy of West Java. J Ethnobiol 19 (1): 97-125.
Iskandar J, Iskandar BS. 2016. Ethnoastronomy-the Baduy agricultural calendar and prediction of environmental perturbations. Biodiversitas 17 (2): 694-703. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d170244.
Khoury CK, Brush S, Costich DE, Curry HA, De Haan S, Engels JMM, Guarino L, Hoban S, Mercer KL, Miller AJ, Nabhan GP, Perales HR, Richards C, Riggins C, Thormann I. 2022. Crop genetic erosion: Understanding and responding to loss of crop diversity. New Phytol 233 (1): 84-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17733.
Kielak O. 2020. The linguocultural image of raspberries (Rubus idaeus) in Polish. Ethnobot Res Appl 20: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.32859/era.20.39.1-15.
Ko KH. 2016. The influence of rice agriculture on East Asian culture and language. Eur J East Asian Stud 15 (1): 86-107. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700615-01501001.
Kravchenko N, Yemets N, Kurbal-Hranovska O. 2022. Metaphorical folk names of English and Ukrainian homeopathic plants: Comparative analysis in cognitive and linguocultural framework. Theor Pract Lang Stud 12 (2): 367-374. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1202.20.
Li PJK. 2017. Some notes on animals and plants for Proto-Austronesian speakers. Lang Linguist 18 (2): 254-268. https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.18.2.04li.
Li R, Huang Y, Yang X, Su M, Xiong H, Dai Y, Wu W, Pei X, Yuan Q. 2023. Genetic diversity and relationship of Shanlan upland rice were revealed based on 214 upland rice SSR markers. Plants 12 (15): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152876.
Lodhi SS, Maryam S, Shafique A, Yousaf ZA, Talha AM, Gul A, Rafique K, Amir R. 2020. Overview of the prospective strategies for conservation of genomic diversity in wheat landraces. In: Ozturk M, Gul A (eds.). Climate Change and Food Security with Emphasis on Wheat. Academic Press, Massachusetts. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819527-7.00021-2.
Loh J, Harmon D. 2005. A global index of biocultural diversity. Ecol Indic 5 (3): 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.02.005.
Loko LEY, Toffa J, Adjatin A, Akpo AJ, Orobiyi A, Dansi A. 2018. Folk taxonomy and traditional uses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces by the sociolinguistic groups in the central region of the Republic of Benin. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 14 (1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0251-6.
Maffi L. 2005. Linguistic, cultural and biological diversity. Annu Rev Anthropol 34: 599-617. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120437.
Mandakh U, Battseren M, Ganbat D, Ayanga T, Adiya Z, Borjigidai A, Long C. 2020. Folk nomenclature of plants in Cistanche deserticola-associated community in South Gobi, Mongolia. Plant Diver 42 (6): 434-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2020.09.008.
Mekbib F. 2007. Infra-specific folk taxonomy in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in Ethiopia: Folk nomenclature, classification, and criteria. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 3 (1): 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-38.
Milică I. 2020. The library of nature: Reality and metaphor in the botanical classification. Diacronia 11 (1): 155-156. https://doi.org/10.17684/i11a155en.
Mokhiruh K. 2017. Plant naming patterns as a reflection of language image of the world. Linguist Lit Stud 5 (3): 179-183. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2017.050304.
Mziray PR, Lusekelo A. 2025. Examining plant names and their socio-cultural significance among speakers of Chasu in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Cogent Arts Humanit 12 (1): 2457827. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2457827.
Nabhan GP. 2000. Interspecific relationships affecting endangered species recognized by O’odham and Comcáac cultures. Ecol Appl 10 (5): 1288-1295. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1288:IRAESR]2.0.CO;2.
Ortman T, Sandström E, Bengtsson J, Watson CA, Bergkvist G. 2023. Farmers’ motivations for landrace cereal cultivation in Sweden. Biol Agric Hortic 39 (4): 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2023.2207081.
Pfeiffer JM, Dun S, Mulawarman B, Rice KJ. 2006. Biocultural diversity in traditional rice-based agroecosystems: Indigenous research and conservation of mavo (Oryza sativa L.) upland rice landraces of eastern Indonesia. Environ Dev Sustain 8 (4): 609-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9047-2.
Phaka FM, Netherlands EC, Kruger DJD, Du Preez LH. 2019. Folk taxonomy and indigenous names for frogs in Zululand, South Africa. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 15 (1): 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0294-3.
Pieroni A. 2022. Bio-cultural diversities: Why they matter now. Biology 11 (3): 475. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11030475.
Qing YJ, Lesmana M. 2022. Hindu-Buddhist influence on the myths of rice gods in Southeast Asia and its role in modern agriculture development. Intl J Res Innov Soc Sci 6 (3): 589-597. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2022.6326.
Rigg J. 1862. A Dictionary of the Sunda Language of Java. Lange & Co, Batavia.
Rosaldo MZ. 1972. Metaphors and folk classification. Southwest J Anthropol 28 (1): 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.28.1.3629445.
Roy S, Patra BC, Kumar J, Sar P, Jogi US, Konyak Z, Banerjee A, Basak N, Mandal NP, Bansal KC. 2024. Ethnolinguistic associations and genetic diversity of rice landraces in Nagaland, India. Plant People Planet 6 (2): 452-469. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10454.
Sagart L. 2011. How many independent rice vocabularies in Asia? Rice 4: 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12284-011-9077-8.
Suryani AJ. 2021. From respected hermits to ordinary citizen: The conversion of the Baduy, ethnicity, and politics of religion in Indonesia (1977-2019). [Dissertation]. Leiden University, Leiden.
Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M. 2008. Cultural importance indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain). Econ Bot 62 (1): 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9004-5.
Tokuoka Y, Yamasaki F, Kimura K, Hashigoe K, Oka M. 2019. Tracing chronological shifts in farmland demarcation trees in Southwestern Japan: Implications from species distribution patterns, folk nomenclature, and multiple usage. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 15 (1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-0301-8.
Ulicsni V, Svanberg I, Molnár Z. 2016. Folk knowledge of invertebrates in Central Europe: Folk taxonomy, nomenclature, medicinal and other uses, folklore, and nature conservation. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 12 (1): 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0118-7.
Van Andel T, Veltman MA, Bertin A, Maat H, Polime T, Lambers DHR, Awie JT, Boer HD, Manzanilla V. 2019. Hidden rice diversity in the Guianas. Front Plant Sci 10: 1161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01161.
Van Driem G. 2012. The ethnolinguistic identity of the domesticators of Asian rice. C R Palevol 11 (2-3): 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2011.07.004.
Walker AR. 1994. Rice in Southeast Asian Myth and Ritual. The Ohio State University, Ohio.
Wang F, Sun T, Yu S, Liu C, Cheng Z, Xia J, Han L. 2024. Ethnobotanical studies on rice landraces under on-farm conservation in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan Province, China. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 20 (1): 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-024-00683-y.
Wang Q, Fongkaew W, Petrini M, Kantaruksa K, Chaloumsuk N, Wang S. 2019. An ethnographic study of traditional postpartum beliefs and practices among Chinese women. Pac Rim Intl J Nurs Res 23 (2): 142-155.
Wangpan T, Gogoi H, Tapi T, Tangjang S. 2019. Bio-cultural diversity and ethnobotanic utility of indigenous rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Lakhimpur District, Assam, India. Not Sci Biol 11 (1): 138-144. https://doi.org/10.15835/NSB11110354.
Wonkyi PN. 2021. Metaphor as an object naming tool in the Mfantse dialect of Akan. Nord J Afr Stud 30 (1): 21. https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v30i1.746.
Worojie TB, Asfaw BT, Mengesha WA. 2021. Indigenous biosystematics of yams (Dioscorea spp.) in Southwest Ethiopia: Folk taxonomy, ethnolinguistic analysis, and folk descriptors. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 17 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00427-8.
Zamudio F, Hilgert NI. 2015. Multi-dimensionality and variability in folk classification of stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini). J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 11 (1): 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0029-z.
Zapico FL, Aguilar CH, Abistano A, Turner JC, Reyes LJ. 2015. Biocultural diversity of Sarangani Province, Philippines: An ethno-ecological analysis. Rice Sci 22 (3): 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2015.05.018.
Zapico FL, Dizon JT, Borromeo TH, McNally KL, Fernando ES, Hernandez JE. 2020. Genetic erosion in traditional rice agro-ecosystems in Southern Philippines: Drivers and consequences. Plant Genet Resour 18 (1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262119000406.