Mapping dominant mangrove genera using SPOT-6 imagery and Maximum Likelihood Classification for conservation planning in Langsa City, Aceh, Indonesia
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Rahmadi MT, Damayani WN, Harefa MS. 2026. Mapping dominant mangrove genera using SPOT-6 imagery and Maximum Likelihood Classification for conservation planning in Langsa City, Aceh, Indonesia. Asian J For 10 (1): r100120. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r100120. Mangrove forests are among the world's most productive and ecologically significant coastal ecosystems, providing essential services such as shoreline stabilization, carbon sequestration, and habitat provision. Indonesia accounts for approximately 19.5% of the global mangrove area, underscoring its critical role in coastal resilience and in supporting coastal communities. Despite their importance, these ecosystems face increasing pressures from anthropogenic activities, land-use change, and climate change, necessitating accurate and up-to-date information for effective monitoring and restoration planning. While remote sensing is indispensable, mangrove mapping at the genus level remains limited. Such detailed data are essential for robust zoning-based conservation planning and targeted strategies. This study addresses this gap by characterizing the distribution of dominant mangrove genera in Langsa City, Aceh, an area with mangrove representation. Utilizing high-resolution SPOT-6 imagery and the Maximum Likelihood Classification method, supported by comprehensive field validation with 30 control points, we produced a genus-level classification map. The total mangrove area identified in Langsa City is 5,837.46 ha, distributed across five sub-districts. Based on the classification and field data, three dominant mangrove genera were reliably identified: Rhizophora (2,216.01 ha), Avicennia (2,086.34 ha), and Ceriops (1,535.11 ha), which collectively account for 95% of the mangrove area, with Rhizophora being the most dominant. The overall accuracy and kappa coefficient achieved were 83% and 76%, respectively, indicating robust and reliable mapping results. This up-to-date, genus-level spatial information is invaluable for effective, zoning-based mangrove management, targeted conservation planning, and sustainable resource utilization in Langsa City and similar coastal regions. The findings underscore the potential of high-resolution SPOT-6 imagery for precise mapping of mangrove genera and support evidence-based conservation efforts.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Akram H, Hussain S, Mazumdar P, Chua KO, Butt TE, Harikrishna JA. 2023. Mangrove health: A review of functions, threats, and challenges associated with mangrove management practices. Forests 14 (9): 1698-1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f14091698
Ashton EC. 2022. Threats to Mangroves and Conservation Strategies. In: Das SC, Pullaiah, Ashton EC (eds.). Mangroves: Biodiversity, Livelihoods and Conservation. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0519-3_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0519-3_10
Baubekova A, Ahrari A, Etemadi H, Kløve B, Haghighi AT. 2023. Environmental flow assessment for intermittent rivers supporting the most poleward mangroves. Sci Total Environ 907: 167981-167981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167981
Bengen DG. 2002. Ekosistem dan Sumberdaya Alam Pesisir dan Laut serta Prinsip Pengelolaannya. Pusat Kajian Sumberdaya Pesisir Dan Lautan Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. [Indonesian]
Chan-Bagot K, Herndon KE, Nicolau AP, Martín-Arias V, Evans CV, Parache HB, Mosely K, Narine Z, Zutta BR. 2024. Integrating SAR, optical, and machine learning for enhanced coastal mangrove monitoring in Guyana. Remote Sens 16 (3): 542-542. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16030542
Hati JP, Chaube NR, Hazra S, Goswami S, Pramanick N, Samanta S, Chanda A, Mitra D, Mukhopadhyay A. 2022. Mangrove monitoring in Lothian Island using airborne hyperspectral AVIRIS-NG data. Adv Space Res 73 (2): 1427-1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.063
Hickey S, Radford B. 2022. Turning the tide on mapping marginal mangroves with multi-dimensional space-time remote sensing. Remot Sens 14 (14): 3365-3365. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143365
Huang K, Yang G, Sun W, Fu B, Chen C, Meng X, Tian F, Wang L. 2024. The phenology and water level time-series mangrove index for improved mangrove monitoring. Intl J Appl Earth Observ Geoinfo 134: 104188-104188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104188
Iswahyudi I, Kusmana C, Hidayat A, Noorachmat BP. 2020. Lingkungan biofisik hutan mangrove di Kota Langsa, Aceh. J Natur Resour Environ Manag 10 (1): 98-110. https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.10.1.98-110. [Indonesian] DOI: https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.10.1.98-110
Kamal M, Phinn S. 2011. Hyperspectral data for mangrove species mapping: A comparison of pixel-based and object-based approach. Remot Sens 3 (10): 2222-2242. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3102222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs3102222
Katili AS, Ibrahim M, Zakaria Z. 2017. Degradation level of mangrove forest and its reduction strategy in Tabongo Village, Boalemo District, Gorontalo Province, Indonesia. Asian J Forest 1 (1): 18-22. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r010102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r010102
Koedsin W, Vaiphasa C. 2013. Discrimination of tropical mangroves at the species level with EO-1 hyperion data. Remot Sens 5 (7): 3562-3582. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5073562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5073562
Middleton L, Astuti P, Brown BM, Brimblecombe J, Stacey N. 2024. “We Don’t need to worry because we will find food tomorrow”: Local knowledge and drivers of mangroves as a food system through a gendered lens in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Sustainability 16 (8): 3229-3229. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083229
Mulyanto M, Kamal M. 2024. Comparison of All Return Cover Index (ARCI) and First Return Cover Index (FRCI) methods for mapping percentage of mangrove canopy cover using LiDAR data. Indones J Geogr 56 (2): 326-334. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.86917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.86917
Pham TD, Yokoya N, Bui DT, Yoshino K, Friess DA. 2019. Remote sensing approaches for monitoring mangrove species, structure, and biomass: Opportunities and challenges. Remot Sens 11 (3): 230-230. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030230
Rahmadi MT, Yuniastuti E, Hakim MA, Suciani A. 2021. Pemetaan distribusi mangrove menggunakan citra sentinel-2A: Studi kasus Kota Langsa. Jambura Geosci Rev 4 (1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.34312/jgeosrev.v4i1.11380. [Indonesian] DOI: https://doi.org/10.34312/jgeosrev.v4i1.11380
Rahmadi MT, Yuniastuti E, Suciani A, Harefa MS, Persada AY, Tuhono E. 2023. Threats to mangrove ecosystems and their impact on coastal biodiversity: A study on mangrove management in Langsa City. Indones J Earth Sci 3 (2): A627. https://doi.org/10.52562/injoes.2023.627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52562/injoes.2023.627
Rosmasita, Siregar VP, Agus SB, Jhonnerie R. 2019. An Object-based classification of mangrove land cover using support vector machine algorithm. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 284 (1): 12024-12024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/284/1/012024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/284/1/012024
Sanjoto TB, Husna VN, Sidiq WABN. 2021. Spectral angle mapper algorithm for mangrove biodiversity mapping in Semarang Indonesia. Università Degli Studi Di Torino. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/6238.
Sawant S, Bonala P, Joshi A, Shindikar M, Patil A, Vyas S, Deobagkar D. 2024. Integration of machine learning and remote sensing for assessing the change detection of mangrove forests along the Mumbai coast. J Earth Syst Sci 133 (4): 185-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02378-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02378-0
Sulaiman U, Wilkins DE, Rahmawati R, Subair S, Bakri W, Suban A, Mihrani M, Ilham I, Kango A, Obie M. 2023. Contribution of local wisdom of the Bajo Tribe to preserve Indonesia’s mangrove forests. Acad J Interdiscipl Stud 12(3): 264-264. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0076
Tran TV, Reef R, Zhu X, Gunn A. 2024. Characterising the distribution of mangroves along the southern coast of Vietnam using multi-spectral indices and a deep learning model. Sci Total Environ 923: 171367-171367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171367
Viennois G, Proisy C, Féret J-B, Prosperí J, Sidik F, Suhardjono SS, Rahmania R, Longépé N, Germain O, Gaspar P. 2016. Multitemporal analysis of high-spatial-resolution optical satellite imagery for mangrove species mapping in Bali, Indonesia. IEEE J Select Topic Appl Earth Observ Remot Sens 9 (8): 3680-3686. https://doi.org/10.1109/jstars.2016.2553170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2016.2553170
Wang D, Wan B, Qiu P, Su Y, Guo Q, Wang R, Sun F, Wu X. 2018. Evaluating the performance of Sentinel-2, Landsat 8 and Pléiades-1 in mapping mangrove extent and species. Remot Sens 10 (9): 1468-1468. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091468
Wang T, Zhang H, Lin H, Fang C. 2015. Textural-Spectral Feature-Based Species Classification of Mangroves in Mai Po nature reserve from Worldview-3 imagery. Remot Sens 8 (1): 24-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010024
Wulandari I, Hendrawan R, Husodo T, Megantara EN. 2018. Vegetation structure and composition in Ciletuh Geopark, Sukabumi, Indonesia. Asian J For 2 (2): 54-61. https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r020203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r020203
Yunus S, Mappasomba Z, Haidir M. 2023. Analysis of mangrove ecosystem sustainability in the Biringkassi mangrove area, Pangkep District, Indonesia. J Appl Natur Sci 15 (4): 1711-1719. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i4.5034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v15i4.5034