Production of potato (Solanum tuberosum) pre-basic seed through tissue culture in Katibougou, Mali

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

MOUSSA ABDOULAYE
ESSIE T. BLAY
JOHN S. Y. ELEBLU

Abstract

Abstract. Abdoulaye M, Blay ET, Eleblu JSY. 2021. Production of potato (Solanum tuberosum) pre-basic seed through tissue culture in Katibougou, Mali. Cell Biol Dev 5: 90-104. In Mali, the main problem limiting the productivity and production of potatoes is the non-availability of quality seeds in adequate quantities and at affordable prices. This study proposes two experiments on the techniques adopted in Mali's IPR/IFRA plant biotechnology laboratory to meet quantity and quality improvements. That evaluation of the effects of 3 concentrations of coconut water and 2 of potassium nitrate on potato plantlets growth in vitro and of 2 physiological ages and 3 substrates on potato in vitro plants' establishment, post in vitro growth, and mini tubers production in vivo. The first experiment was a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 12 treatments replicated 4 times. The second was a factorial experiment with 2 factors (physiological ages: 2 levels and substrate: 3 levels) in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with 6 treatments replicated 4 times. The first experiment showed that the culture medium M7 (MS+40 mL/L of coconut water +250 mg of potassium nitrate) had promoted all plant growth parameters (shoot emergence, plant height, number of nodes, leaves and roots, and plant fresh and dry weight) after 30 days of in vitro culturing. The lower concentrations of coconut water (40 mL) and potassium nitrate (250 mg) per liter of MS medium had significant and positive effects on all the in vitro growth parameters after 30 days. The second experiment showed that the plantlet weaning age of 25 days and the post-flask culture substrate S1 (only soil) provided the best plant survival percentage at 20 days after transplanting in vivo. The substrate S2 (soil and cow dung 2:1) positively affects plant stem length, stem diameter, fresh and dry biomass formation, tuber yield, tuber numbers per plant, and tuber grading size B (tubers with a diameter of less than 28 mm). The substrate composition S1 (only soil) has significantly affected the weight loss (12.50%) of tubers stored within 8 weeks. The weaning age was 45 days, and the substrates S2 (soil and cow dung 2:1) and S3 (soil and cow dung 1:1) significantly reduced the number of sprouts per tuber and sprouts number per eye on tubers. In addition, the results indicate that for the better and more rapid growth of potato plantlets in vitro culture, the coconut water concentration used as a supplement to MS medium should be 40 mL per liter of medium. The proportion of cow dung used in substrate composition should not exceed the soil and cow dung ratio 2:1 for maximum post-transplanting plant re-establishment rate in vivo and rapid maturity of mini-tubers.

2017-01-01

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Abdullahil BS, Yun K, Elshmari T, Lee EJ, Paek KY. 2011. Effect of light quality, sucrose and coconut water concentration on the microporpagation of calanthe hybrids ("bukduseong" × "hyesung" and "chunkwang" ×' hyesung'. Austral J Crop Sci 5 (10): 1247-1254.
Afshin AH, Kaviani B, Tarang A, Zanjani SBI. 2011. Effect of different concentrations of kinetin on regeneration of ten weeks (Matthiola incana). Plant Omics J 4: 236-238.
Anderson WC. 1978. Rooting of tissue cultured rhododendrons. Proc Intl Plant Prop Soc 28: 135-139.
ARVALIS /Institut-du-végétal. 2013. Rapport d’activités pommes de terre 2012, 94.
Bajaj YPS, Sopory SK. 1986. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol2, Crops. Springer, Bferlin Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-61625-9.
BNDA. 2014. Fiche Technique - Pomme de terre/Banque Nationale de Développement Agricole du Mali, 5.
CIDES. 1999. Micropropagation pour l’entreprise serricole - Cahier de références techniques, 44.
Conner AJ, Thomas MB. 1982. Re-establishing plantlets from Tissue culture: A review. 342-357.
Coulibaly M, Dembélé D, et Vanderhofstadt B. 2002. Unité pilote de production de plants de pomme de terre au Mali, SOC International - AMATEVI., 82.
Diakité L, Zid M. 2003. Etude diagnostique de la filière pomme de terre dans trois pays de l’Afrique de l’Ouest. CILSS-INSAH, II, 58.
FAO. 2009. New Light on a Hidden Treasure. Review, 148. Rome.
FAO. 2106. The State of Food and Agriculture 2016 in Africa. Rome.
Gorst JR, Bourne RA, Hardaker SE, Richards AE, Dircks S, de Fossard RA. 1978. Tissue culture propagation of two Grevillea hybrids. Proc Intl Plant Prop Soc 28: 435-445.
ITCMI. 2012. Bulletin Mensuel d’information no 06 Novembre 2012, 2.
Jackson JC, Gordon A, Wizzard G, McCook K, Rolle R. 2004. Changes in chemical composition of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) water during maturation of the fruit. J Sci Food Agric 84: 1049-1052. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1783.
Martin M. 2006. Lutter contre la déshydratation des tubercules, 10-13.
Mimouni A. 2011. Effet de la fertilité des sols et de la fertilisation sur les jeunes plants de l ’ arganier transplantation en milieu réel, 109-118.
MINRESI-IRAD. 2012. Contribution à l’augmentation de la productivité et de la production de la pomme de terre par la création et la diffusion de matériel végétal performant, (Projet C2D Pomme de terre Cameroun), 24.
Monirul MI, Akhter S, Majid NM, Alam MS, Jannatul F. 2013. Integrated nutrient management for potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in grey terrace soil. Aust J Crop Sci 7 (9): 1235-1241.
Muhammad K, Gul Z, Jamal Z, Ahmed M, Rehman A, Khan ZU. 2015. Effect of coconut water from different fruit maturity stages, as natural substitute for synthetic PGR in in vitro potato micropropagation. Intl J Biosci 6: 84-92. DOI: 10.12692/ijb/6.2.84-92.
Mullukattil LR. 2013. The chemical composition of tender coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) water and coconut meat and their biological effect in human body. Intl J Green Herbal Chem 2 (3): 723-729.
Overbeek VJ, Conklin ME, Blakeslee AF. 1941. Factors in coconut milk essential for growth & development of very young Datura embryos. Science 94: 350-351. DOI: 10.1126/science.94.2441.350.
Pengthamkeeratia P, Motavalli PP, Kremer RJ. 2011. Soil microbial activity and functional diversity changed by compaction, poultry litter and cropping in a claypan soil. Appl Soil Ecol 48: 71-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.01.005.
Prades A, Dornier M, Diop N, Pain JP. 2011. Coconut water-uses composition and properties: a review. Fruits 67: 87-107. DOI: 10.1051/fruits/2012002.
Reddy EP, Lakshmi T. 2014. Coconut water-properties, uses, nutritional benefits in health and wealth and in health and disease: A review. Clin Med Lab Biochem 2 (2): 6-18.
Reust W. 1982. Contribution à l’appréciation de l’âge physiologique des tubercules de pommes de terre (Solanum tuberosum L.) et étude de son importance sur le rendement (thèse de doctorat. Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, Zurich.
Suh C, Meka SS, Ngome AF, Neba DA, Kemngwa IT, Sonkouat AD, Njualem D. 2015. Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizer on the yield and. J Agric Soc Res 5 (2): 5. DOI: 10.7537/marsnsj14021607.
UNIFA. 2005. Principaux éléments fertilisants Parlons fertilisation. Infa 1-6.
Vanderhofstadt B. 2011. Etude de faisabilité de la mise en place d’une filière “plant de pomme de terre” au Mali, (Ref?: RMMAPCDA1111vc), 1-77.
Yong JW, Ge L, Yan FNg, Tan SN. 2009. The chemical composition and biological properties of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) water. Molecules 14 (12): 5144-5164. DOI: 10.3390/molecules14125144.