Influence of co-management on marine resources sustainability in Shimoni and Wasini areas, Kenya

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

AGATHA ADHIAMBO OGADA
SAEED MWAGUNI

Abstract

Abstract. Ogada AA, Mwaguni S. 2019. Influence of co-management on marine resources sustainability in Shimoni and Wasini areas, Kenya. Ocean Life 3: 65-73. The research investigated the influence of the co-management of marine resources for sustainable development. Comanagement is proposed as the ideal tool for sustainable management of marine resources and ensuring stakeholders are involved in decision-making and managing their resources. The study was undertaken to generate knowledge on the influence of co-management on sustainable marine resources; the study area chosen had some background in co-management before. The study was conducted through a survey research design using questionnaires, semi-structured questionnaires, interviews, and focus group discussions, with a sample size of 145 respondents. The collected data was coded using SPSS 19 for analysis, including; presenting simple percentages, frequencies, and cross-tabs. In addition, chi-square was used to test the hypotheses. The study's results focused on co-management variables: institutional design, community participation, and socio-ecological dynamics. The results showed that 95% of the respondents perceived the co-management institutional design as adequate. Community participation is a key factor of co-management, which was proven right with 82.5%. There is the agreement that communities' roles in co-management were clearly defined and involved in the decision-making process. Moreover, 92.5% of the respondents said that IK is valuable and was not only applied in co-management but also effective in its application. In conclusion, the study shows that co-management positively influences conservation and community members' well-being. Therefore the researcher concluded that co-management is an adequate tool for planning and sustainable management of marine resources. However, it was recommended that improved intergovernmental and interagency partnerships are needed to address cross-cutting and emerging issues in co-management.

2017-01-01

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Ahmed A, Capistrano AD, Hossain M. 2004 Experiences of partnership models for the comanagement of Bangladesh fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol 4 (3): 233-248. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2400.1997.00115.x.
Akpabli KR. 2000. Integrated Management Of The Gulf Of Guinea Fight Against Coastal Pollution. Paper Presented At The Sustainable Development For Coastal Zones And Instruments For Its Evaluation. Bremerhaven, Germany, October 23-26 2000.
Aswani S, Hamilton R. 2004. Integrating indigenous ecological knowledge and customary sea tenure with marine and social science for conservation of bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum) in the Roviana Lagoon, Solomon Islands. Environ Consort 31 (1): 69-83. DOI: 10.1017/S037689290400116X.
Berkes F. 2009a. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manag 90: 1692-1702. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001.
Berkes F. 2009b. Social aspects of fisheries management. In: Cochrane K and Garcia S (eds). A fishery Manager's Guidebook. Second Edition. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Godden B. 2004. Sample Size Formulas. http://williamgodden.com/samplesizeformula.pdf
Gunderson LH, Holling CS, 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Huntington H, Suydam R, Rosenberg D. 2004. Traditional knowledge and satellite tracking as complementary approaches to ecological understanding. Environ Conserv 31: 177-180. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892904001559.
McClanahan TR, Mwaguni S, Muthiga NA. 2005. Management of the Kenyan coast. Ocean Coast Manag 48 (11-12): 901-931. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2005.03.005.
Mundy D. 2002. A Question of Response Rate. Solution Corner. https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/wp-content/uploads/v25n1p025-026.pdf
Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763.