Factors influencing the adoption of rice paddy threshing machine “Powered-Thresher”: A case study of Serang District, Banten Province

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

TIAN MULYAQIN
ISHII KEICHI

Abstract

Mulyaqin T, Keichi I. 2017. Factors influencing the adoption of rice paddy threshing machine “Powered-Thresher”: A case study of Serang District, Banten Province. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon 3: 420-425. For ensuring national food security, main focus policy of Indonesia government is not only to increase rice production, but also to reduce harvest and post-harvest losses in order to safe rice production. Introducing and disseminating threshing machine such as powered-thresher to rice farmer is one of the government efforts to reduce yield losses and labor cost, especially on threshing stage. This paper examined the factors influencing the adoption of powered-thresher in rice production area in Serang District, Banten Province, Indonesia. The data used in this study were collected mainly through an interview survey using structured questioner to 103 respondents, including 61 respondents as adopters and 42 respondents as non-adopters of paddy’s threshing machine. It was conducted in 4 (four) sub-district (Ciruas, Lebak Wangi, Pontang, Tirtayasa) in Serang district area for the first season of 2014/2015 cropping season with descriptive statistics and probit logistic regression model as a tool for data analysis. Empirical study shows that the significant factors influencing the adoption of power threshers positively are farm size and financial source, and the significant factors that influencing the adoption of power thresher negatively are the labor availability including the number of the household member who working in farm and side job as a labor and threshing cost. This is true in the case of a non-adopter area where high labor availability prevents the use of power thresher because of the possibility of conflict due to labor displacement. However, dissemination information about the machine through agriculture extension activity by stakeholder (government, extension officer, farmers) to the farmer as a user is the important factor to increase adoption of agriculture technology, especially this kind of threshing machine.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Negassa A. 2009. Improving smallholder farmers marketed supply and
market access for dairy product in Arsi Zone, Ethiopia. Research
report 21, ILRI International Livestock research institute, Nairobi,
Kenya.

Abara IOC, Singh S. 1993. Ethics and biases in technology adoption: The
small farm argument. Technol Forecast Soc Change 43: 289-300.

Barungi M, Ng’ong’ola DH, Edriss A, Mugisha J, Waithaka M,
Tukahirwa J. 2013. Factors influencing the adoption of soil erosion
control technologies by farmers along the slopes of Mt. Elgon in
Eastern Uganda. J Sustain Dev 6: 9-25.

Boniphace NS, Fengying N, Chen F. 2015. An analysis of smallholder
farmers' socio-economic determinants for inputs use: A case of major
rice producing regions in Tanzania. Russian J Agric Socio-Econ 2
(38): 41-55.

Gould BW, Supe WE, Klemne RM. 1989. Conservation tillage: the role of
farm and operator characteristics and the perception of soil erosion.
Land Econ 65 (2): 167-182.

Henningsen A. 2014. Introduction to econometric production analysis
with R (draft version). Departement of Food and Economics
Resource. University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Egyir IS. 2007. Assessing the Factors of Use of Agro-chemicals by
Plantain Farmers in Ghana Using the ASTI Analytical Framework.
www.africa-platform.org/resources

Koop G. 2003. Bayesian Economy. John Whiley & Son Inc, USA.

Mayunar. 2012. The Productivity and Profit Level of Rice Farming
through Legowo Planting System in Kramatwatu Subdistrict – Serang
District. Buletin of BPTP Banten. Banten. [Indonesian]

Ministry of Agriculture of Indonesia. 2014. Annual Report of Government
Institution Sub-Directorate of Postharvest, Directorate General of
Food Crops Ministry of Agriculture in 2014. [Indonesian]

Neill SP, Lee DR. 1999. Explaining the adoption and disadoption of
sustainable agriculture: the case of cover crops in northern Honduras.
Working paper 31. Departement of Agriculture, Resource, and
Managerial Economics, Cornell University.

Nugraha S, Thahir R, Sudaryono. 2007. Description of rice harvesting loss
in 3(three) different agro-ecosystem. Buletin Teknologi Pascapanen
Pertanian 3(1): 42-49. [Indonesian]

Adesope OM, Matthews-Njoku EC, Oguzor NS, Ugwuja VC. 2012.
Effect of Socio-Economic Characteristics of Farmers on Their
Adoption of Organic Farming Practices, Crop Production
Technologies. Sharma S (ed.). InTech, Croatia. www.intechopen.com

Pingali P. 2007. Agricultural Mechanization: Adoption Pattern and
Economic Impact. Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Volume 3.
Elsevier B.V., the Nederlands.

Purwadaria HK, Ananto EE, Sulistiadji K, Sutrisno, Thahir R. 1994.
Development of stripping and threshing type harvester. Postharvest
Technologies for Rice in the Humid Tropics-Indonesia. Technical
report submitted to GTZ-IRRI Project, IRRI.The Philippines.

Purwanto. 2011. Kehilangan pascapanen padi kita masih tinggi.
io.ppijepang.org [Indonesian]

Swastika DKS. 2012. Harvest and Post–Harvest Technologies: Adoption
Constraint and Development Strategy. pse.litbang.pertanian.go.id
[Indonesian]

Tjahjohutomo R. 2008. Commercialization of technological innovations
of agricultural research and development. Presented at Workshop to
build synergy of A-B-G in commercialization of local agricultural
machinery. The Faculty of Agricultural Technology. IPB, Bogor
2008.8. IAARD, Jakarta.[Indonesian]

Traore N, Landry R, Amara N. 1998. On-farm adoption of conservation
practices: the role of farm and farmer characteristics, perceptions, and
health hazards. Land Econ 74 (1)? 114-127

Zhou Y, Yang H, Mosler HJ, Abbaspour KC. 2010. Factors affecting
farmers decisions on fertilizer use: A case study for the Chaobai
watershed in Northern China. J Sustain Dev 4 (1): 80-102