Metagenomic insights into bacterial communities in eco-enzymes and their microbial diversity and abundance
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Novianti T, Saraswati H, Hafsah H, Seprianto. 2025. Metagenomic insights into bacterial communities in eco-enzymes and their microbial diversity and abundance. Biodiversitas 26: 2157-2166. The aim of microbial diversity analysis of eco-enzymes is to optimize their benefits in various fields, such as for use in disinfectants, household cleaning agents, liquid fertilizers, and more. Metagenomic profiling is an effective method of analyzing microbial diversity that involves determining the nucleotide sequences of microbial DNA and allows the identification and taxonomic classification of certain bacteria. In this study, metagenomic analysis was carried out on eco-enzymes derived from mangosteen peel, orange peel, and a mixture of 16S rRNA gene primers. We visualized the amplification results using electrophoresis to confirm the length of the DNA base band obtained. We then sequenced the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) products using MinKNOW software (version 23.04.5; Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford-UK). The bioinformatics metagenomic analysis included chronological visualization, Sankey phylogenetic analysis, heat map graphing, and Venn diagram visualization. The study's results showed that in the mangosteen peel eco-enzyme there were bacteria from 7 different phyla. The results of the alpha-diversity index analysis showed the highest value of 2,050 compared to other samples. However, the abundance of each species was lower than that in the other samples. In contrast, the orange peel eco-enzyme had only one bacterial phylum, and the mixed vegetable eco-enzyme had two bacterial phyla. This finding indicates that mangosteen peel eco-enzyme has the most abundant bacterial diversity from different phyla than orange peel eco-enzyme and mix-vegetables, which may cause diversity in the enzyme content produced.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abdulsalam RA, Ijabadeniyi OA, Cason ED, Sabiu S. 2023. Characterization of microbial diversity of two tomato cultivars through targeted next-generation sequencing 16S RRNA and ITS techniques. Microorganisms 11: 23-37. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11092337.
Acuña JJ, Hu J, Inostroza NG, Valenzuela T, Epstein PPS, Sessitsch A, Zhang Q, Jorquera MA. 2023. Endophytic bacterial communities in ungerminated and germinated seeds of commercial vegetables. Sci Rep 13 (1): 19-29. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47099-4.
Arundina I, Suardita K, Diyatri I, Dwi M. 2018. Mangosteen skin (Gracinia mangostana L) as stem cell growth factor. J Intl Dental Med Res 11 (3): 765-769.
Berini F, Casciello C, Marcone GL, Marinelli F. 2017. Metagenomics: Novel enzymes from non-culturable microbes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 364 (21): fnx211. DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fnx211.
Brazda V, Fojta M, Bowater RP. 2020. Structures and stability of simple DNA repeats from bacteria. Biochem J 477 (2): 325-239. DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20190703.
de la Fuente-Salcido NM, Castañeda-Ramírez JC, García-Almendárez BE, Bideshi DK, Salcedo-Hernández R, Barboza-Corona JE. 2015. Isolation and characterization of bacteriocinogenic lactic bacteria from M-Tuba and Tepache, two traditional fermented beverages in México. Food Sci Nutr 3 (5): 434-442. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.236.
Eck, M, Sare AR, Massart S, Schmautz Z, Junge R, Smits THM, Jijakli, MH. 2019. Exploring bacterial communities in aquaponic systems. Water (Switzerland) 11 (2): 1-16. DOI: 10.3390/w11020260.
Gutiérrez-Sarmiento W, Peña-Ocaña BA, Lam-Gutiérrez A, Guzmán- Albores JM, Jasso-Chávez R, Ruíz-Valdiviezo VM. 2022. Microbial community structure, physicochemical characteristics and predictive functionalities of the Mexican tepache fermented beverage. Microbiol Res 260: 127045. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127045.
Hanifah IA, Primarista NPV, Prasetyawan S, Safitri A, Adyati T, Srihadyastutie A. 2022. The effect of variations in sugar types and fermentation time on enzyme activity and total titrated acid on eco- enzyme results of fermentation. Proc 7th Intl Conf Biol Sci 22: 585-589. DOI: 10.2991/absr.k.220406.084.
Hasanah Y, Ginting J, Syahputra AS. 2022. Research article role of potassium source from eco enzyme on growth and production of shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) varieties. Asian J Plant Sci 21 (1): 32-38. DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2022.32.38.
Huang Q, Wang Y, Wu H, Yuan M, Zheng C, Xu H. 2021. Xanthone glucosides: Isolation, bioactivity and synthesis. Molecules 26 (18): 5575. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185575.
Indraloka AB, Istanti A, Utami SW. 2023. The physical and chemical characteristics of eco-enzyme fermentation liquids from several compositions of local fruits and vegetables in Banyuwangi. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 1168 (1): 012018. DOI: 10.1088/1755- 1315/1168/1/012018.
Janarthanan M, Mani K, Raja SRS. 2020. Purification of contaminated water using eco enzyme. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 955: 012098. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/955/1/012098.
Kurniawan A, Mustikasari D, Kurniawan A, Kholishah NA. 2024. The preliminary study about physico-chemical property of bio-enzyme produced from orange fruits waste treated with different concentrations of probiotic. Jurnal Lingkungan 22 (4): 861-867. DOI: 10.14710/jil.22.4.861-867.
Liu B, Liu L, Deng B, Huang C, Zhu J, Liang L, He X, Wei Y, Qin C, Liang C, Liu S, Yao S. Application and prospect of organic acid pretreatment in lignocellulosic biomass separation: A review. Intl J Bio Mac 222: 1400-1413. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.270.
Mavani HAK, Tew IM, Wong L, Yew HZ, Mahyuddin A, Ghazali RA, Pow EHN. 2020. Antimicrobial efficacy of fruit peels eco-enzyme against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. Intl J Environ Res Public Health 17 (14): 5107. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145107.
Meng B, Liu H, Hu Z, Qu L, Fang Y. 2023. The diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in pulmonary infectious diseases. Chin Trop Med 23: 1173-1179. DOI: 10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2023.11.09.
Muktiarni M, Rahayu NI, Maryanti R. 2023. Orange and strawberry skins for eco-enzyme: Experiment and bibliometric analysis. J Eng Sci Technol 18: 195-206.
Mursyid TAN, Ginting PP, Anwar. 2022. The effectiveness of eco enzymes to suppress the development of Sarcoptes scabiei mites in vitro. Jurnal Peternakan Integratif 10 (01): 61-70. DOI: 10.32734/jpi.v10i01.8691.
Oviedo-León JF, Cornejo-Mazón M, Ortiz-Hernández R, Torres-Ramírez N, Hernández-Sánchez H, Castro-Rodríguez DC. 2024. Exploration adhesion properties of Liquorilactobacillus and Lentilactobacillus isolated from two different sources of tepache kefir grains. PLoS One 19: e0297900. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297900.
Patel BS, Bhanu RS, Archana UM. 2021. Effect of eco-enzymes prepared from selected organic waste on domestic waste water treatment. World J Adv Res Rev 10: 323-333. DOI: 10.30574/wjarr.2021.10.1.0159.
Permatananda P, Pandit IGS, Cahyawati PN, Aryastuti AASA. 2023. Antimicrobial properties of eco enzyme: A literature review. Biosci Med: J Biomed Transl Res 7: 3370-3376. DOI: 10.37275/bsm.v7i6.831.
Prakash T, Taylor TD. 2012. Functional assignment of metagenomic data: Challenges and applications. Brief Bioinform 13 (6): 711-727. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbs033.
Ramadani AH, Karima R, Ningrum RS.2022. Antibacterial activity of pineapple peel (Ananas comosus) eco-enzyme against acne bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Prapionibacterium acnes). Indonesian J Chem Res 9 (3): 201-207. DOI: 10.30598//ijcr.
Semumu T, Zhou N, Kebaneilwe L, Loeto D, Ndlovu T. 2024. Exploring the microbial diversity of Botswana’s traditional sourdoughs. Fermentation 10 (8): 417. DOI: 10.3390/fermentation10080417.
Tigrero-Vaca J, Maridueña-Zavala MG, Liao HL, Prado-Lince M, Zambrano-Vera CS, Monserrate-Maggi B, Cevallos-Cevallos JM. 2022. Microbial diversity and contribution to the formation of volatile compounds during fine-flavor cacao bean fermentation. Foods 11 (7): 915. DOI: 10.3390/foods11070915.
Wen-Low C, Leong ZLR, Teo SS. 2021. Effective microorganisms in producing eco-enzyme from food waste for wastewater treatment. Appl Microbiol Theor Technol 2 (1): 1-36. DOI: 10.37256/amtt.212021726.
Wirajana IN, Bramandita IM, Sukadana IM. 2024. 16SRRNA fragment of metagenomic DNA, antibacterial and cellulase activity from garbage enzymes of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) peels. Intl Conf Health Sci Environ 2023: 163-171. DOI: 10.2991/978-94-6463-431- 0_17.