Development and validation of a tropical diatom-based index for bioassessment of the Yang River, Northern Thailand
Article Sidebar
Abstract Views: 217
File Views: 223
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Yimpoolsap S. 2026. Development and validation of a tropical diatom-based index for bioassessment of the Yang River, Northern Thailand. Biodiversitas 27 (2): d270206. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d270206. Freshwater ecosystems in tropical Asia are increasingly threatened by nutrient enrichment, organic pollution, and land-use intensification. Diatoms are widely recognised as sensitive biological indicators, yet most available diatom indices were developed for temperate regions and may not adequately reflect ecological conditions in tropical rivers. This study aimed to develop a regionally calibrated, river-specific Diatom Index using the Yang River, Northern Thailand, as a model tropical system for water quality assessment. Water sampling and benthic diatom collection were conducted across seven stations from November 2016 to April 2017. Physico-chemical parameters were analysed according to American Public Health Association (APHA 2017), and diatom assemblages were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level. Indicator Values (IV) and Weighted Averages (WA) were computed for 29 dominant taxa, and the final Diatom Index (DI) was validated against the conventional Water Quality Index (WQI). The study addresses a key methodological limitation in tropical bioassessment by developing an index based on observed ecological responses of tropical diatom assemblages, rather than relying on tolerance values derived from temperate regions. Reproducibility was evaluated using three independent chemistry replicate datasets (R1-R3), which showed high consistency in WA/IV estimation and DI computation (ρ = 0.860-0.907, p < 0.001), indicating that the index-building process was robust and repeatable. The DI showed a significant positive relationship with WQI (ρ = 0.549, r² = 0.3102, p < 0.001), indicating that diatom assemblages effectively captured nutrient and organic pollution gradients. Spatial variation in diatom communities aligned with upstream-midstream-downstream differences in pH, DO, BOD, and nutrient levels. While developed from a single river system, the index provides a regionally appropriate and ecologically meaningful framework for diatom-based water quality assessment in tropical rivers, subject to further validation across additional catchments. The index offers a cost-effective and regionally calibrated approach for routine monitoring and supports improved management of tropical freshwater ecosystems.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Springer, Dordrecht.
American Public Health Association (APHA). 2017. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23nd ed American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC.
Battarbee RW. 1986. Diatom analysis. In: Berglund BE (eds.). Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. 1998. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8 (3): 559-568. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0559:NPOSWW]2.0.CO;2.
Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67 (3): 345-366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2963459.
Guiry MD, Guiry GM. 2025. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org. [Accessed November 2, 2025].
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica 4 (1): 9.
Itayama T, Hawkins PR, Leelahakriengkrai P, Kullasoot S, Whangchai N, Chitmanat C, Peerapornpisal Y, Kawabata Z. 2015. Bioassessment of dry season water quality in the Ping River around Chiang Mai City, Thailand. Chiang Mai J Sci 42 (2): 349-366.
John DM, Whitton BA, Brook AJ. 2011. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles: An Identification Guide to Freshwater and Terrestrial Algae. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Jones W, Medrano S. 2006. Indiana Lake Water Quality Assessment Report for 1999-2003. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
Jørgensen SE, Xu L, Costanza R. 2010. Handbook of Ecological Indicators for Assessment of Ecosystem Health. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1439809365.
Kelly MG, Cazaubon A, Coring E, Dell’Uomo A, Ector L, Goldsmith B, Guasch H, Hürlimann J, Jarlman A, Kawecka B, Kwandrans J, Laugaste R, Lindstrøm EA, Leitao M, Marvan P, Padisák J, Pipp E, Prygiel J, Rott E, Sabater S, van Dam H, Vizinet J. 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. J Appl Phycol 10: 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008033201227.
Kelly MG, Juggins S, Guthrie R, Pritchard S, Jamieson J, Rippey B, Hirst H, Yallop M. 2007. Assessment of ecological status in UK rivers using diatoms. Freshw Biol 53 (2): 403-422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01903.x.
Kelly MG, Whitton BA. 1995. The trophic Diatom Index: A new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J Appl Phycol 7 (4): 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003802.
Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1986-1991. Bacillariophyceae. Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Vols. 1-4). Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart. [German]
Ladera RA, Sinco AL, Sendaydiego JP, Saab LL, Hallazgo CIJS, Raagas EL. 2025. Diatom-based Index: A tool for assessing water quality in A Southeast Asian tropical river basin. Pollution 11 (2): 298-311. https://doi.org/10.22059/poll.2024.378540.2437.
Lange-Bertalot H, Krammer K. 1989. Achnanthes: Eine Monographie der Gattung. Gebrüder Borntraeger Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin. [German]
Leelahakriengkrai P, Peerapornpisal Y. 2011. Diversity of benthic diatoms in six main rivers of Thailand. Thai J Bot 3 (2): 125-138.
Leelahakrienkrai P, Peerapornpisal Y. 2010. Diversity of benthic diatoms and water quality of the Ping River, Northern Thailand. Environ Asia 3 (1): 82-94.
Lepš J, Šmilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615146.
Levene H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I (eds.). Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
Lorraine R, Vollenweider RA. 1981. Eutrophication of Waters: Monitoring, Assessment and Control. OECD, Paris.
Malek S, Salleh A, Milow P, Baba MS, Sharifah SA. 2012. Applying artificial neural network theory to exploring diatom abundance at tropical Putrajaya Lake, Malaysia. J Freshw Ecol 27 (2): 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2011.635883.
Molle F, Mollinga PP. 2003. Water poverty indicators: Conceptual problems and policy issues. Water Policy 5 (5-6): 529-544. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2003.0034.
Moonsin P, Peerapornpisal Y, Rott E, Pipp E, Pimmongkol A. 2013. Diversity of benthic diatoms and water quality of the Mekong River passing through Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. Res J Environ Earth Sci 5 (2): 58-66. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjees.5.5639.
Passy SI. 2007. Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behavior along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquat Bot 86 (2): 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.09.018.
Patrick R, Reimer CW. 1966. The Diatoms of the United States, Vol. 1. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.
Peerapornpisal Y, Chaiubol C, Pekkoh J, Kraibut H, Chorum M, Wannathong P, Ngearnpat N, Jusakul K, Thammathiwat A, Chuanunta J, Inthasotti T. 2004. Monitoring of water quality in Ang Kaew Reservoir of Chiang Mai University using phytoplankton as bioindicator from 1995-2002. Chiang Mai J Sci 31 (1): 85-94.
Pollution Control Department (PCD). 2010. Surface Water Quality Standards of Thailand. Bangkok. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. https://www.pcd.go.th. [Accessed June 12, 2024].
Prasertsin T, Suk-ueng K, Phinyo K, Yana E. 2021. The diversity and abundance of phytoplankton and benthic diatoms in varying environmental conditions in Kok River, Chiang Rai, Thailand as bio-indicators of water quality. Biodiversitas 22 (4): 1853-1862. https://doi.10.13057/biodiv/d220431.
Prygiel J, Coste M. 2000. Guide Méthodologique pour l’application de l’indice Biologique Diatomées (IBD). Agence de l’Eau Artois-Picardie, France. [French]
Rimet F, Bouchez A. 2012. Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers. Knowledge Manag Aquat Ecosyst 406: 01. https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2012018.
Rimet F, Gusev E, Kahlert M, Kelly MG, Kulikovskiy M, Maltsev Y, Mann DG, Pfannkuchen M, Trobajo R, Vasselon V, Zimmermann J, Bouchez A. 2019. Diat.barcode, an open-access curated barcode library for diatoms. Sci Rep 9 (1): 15116. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51500-6.
Round FE, Crawford RM, Mann DG. 1990. The Diatoms: Biology and Morphology of the Genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Schrader HJ, Gersonde R. 1978. Diatoms and silicoflagellates. In: Zachariasse WS (eds.). Micropaleontological Counting Methods and Techniques: An Exercise on an Eight Metres Section of the Lower Pliocene of Capo Rossello, Sicily (Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletins 17, pp. 129-176). Micropaleontological Press, Utrecht.
Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52 (3/4): 591-611. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591.
Sor R, Ngor PB, Soum S, Chandra S, Hogan ZS, Null SE. 2021. Water quality degradation in the Lower Mekong Basin. Water 13 (11): 1555. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13111555.
Stevenson RJ, Pan Y, van Dam H. 2010. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In: Smol JP, Stoermer EF (eds.). The diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763175.005.
Stevenson RJ, Pan Y. 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. In: Stoermer EF, Smol JP (eds.). The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613005.003.
Taylor JC, Harding WR, Archibald CGM. 2007. An Illustrated Guide to Some Common Diatom Species from South Africa. WRC Report No. TT 282/07. Water Research Commission, Pretoria.
van Dam H, Mertens A, Sinkeldam J. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands J Aquat Ecol 28: 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02334251.
Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37 (1): 130-137. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017.
Wetzel RG. 2001. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems 3rd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.
Yana E, Peerapornpisal Y, Mayama S. 2013. Diversity of benthic diatoms and correlation with water quality of Yom River, Thailand. Intl J Appl Environ Sci 8 (15): 1935-1948.
Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1 (1): 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x.