Reproductive biology and pollination ecology of two edible Limnophila species in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract. Malaiphis R, Pakum W, Kaphang S, Chanokkhun T, Muangsan N, Warrit N, Traiyasut P, Barnes CH, Watthana S. 2026. Reproductive biology and pollination ecology of two edible Limnophila species in Thailand. Biodiversitas 27 (1): d270117. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d270117. Culturally important native Thai herbs are declining due to habitat disturbance, overharvesting, and environmental stressors, including the use of herbicides. Limnophila geoffrayi, a native aquatic edible herb, has been especially affected by herbicide use and climate-driven rainfall anomalies. In contrast, the exotic Limnophila aromatica, introduced for edible herb usage, is widely vegetatively propagated. Both edible Limnophila species have poorly studied reproductive biology, which is important for native species conservation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reproductive biology and pollination of the Thai native species L. geoffrayi to support conservation efforts, as well as to compare these traits to those of the introduced cultivated species, L. aromatica. Flowers of both species typically open for one day, with some L. geoffrayi flowers reopening on a second day. Diurnal opening and closing patterns corresponded with peak visitor activity. Solitary bees were the dominant pollinators, with 47.06% Sorensen’s similarity index of visitors between the two plant species. Although both species exhibit floral traits conducive to self-pollination, L. aromatica failed to produce fruit under both natural and insect-excluded conditions, indicating self-incompatibility. In contrast, L. geoffrayi consistently set fruit in bagged treatments, demonstrating self-compatibility and autonomous self-pollination, which resulted from polinator scant. High fruit set under natural conditions suggests strong reproductive assurance in the native species. Field observations also confirmed that both species provided pollen resources for solitary bees, which may contribute to cross-pollination within populations. Due to self-incompatibility and clonal propagation, introducing diverse genotypes is necessary for the long-term cultivation of L. aromatica. As an autonomously self-pollinating species that produces many seeds, L. geoffrayi may serve as a potential adaptation or resilience mechanism in the face of habitat disturbance and herbicide use. Being an annual herbaceous plant with different color forms, seed banking is required to support its conservation and sustainable use.
Article Details
Issue
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abrahamczyk S, Thielen M, Weigend M. 2021. Frequency of flower visitors and achene production increase with rising population size in the self-incompatible herb Centaurea scabiosa (Asteraceae). Plant Ecol 222: 613-623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-021-01129-1.
Cheptou PO. 2024. The evolutionary ecology of inbreeding depression in wild plant populations and its impact on plant mating systems. Front Plant Sci 15: 1359037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1359037.
Christopher AO. 2020. Comparative analyses of diversity and similarity indices of west bank forest and block A forest of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Intl J For Res 2020: 4865845. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4865845.
Far AJ, Cursach J. 2022. Reproductive biology insights for the conservation of Euphorbia fontqueriana, a rare endangered plant species from the western Mediterranean Basin. Plant Biosyst 157 (1): 129-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2022.2089767.
Geissler C, Davidson A, Niesenbaum RA. 2023. The influence of climate warming on flowering phenology in relation to historical annual and seasonal temperatures and plant functional traits. PeerJ 11: e15188. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15188.
Goolmeer T, Skroblin A, Grant C, van Leeuwen S, Archer R, Gore-Birch C, Wintle BA. 2022. Recognizing culturally significant species and Indigenous-led management is key to meeting international biodiversity obligations. Conserv Lett 15 (6): e12899. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12899.
Guo S, Ji P, Wang J, He Y, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Yun Y, Zhang G. 2023. Estimation of genetic diversity between and within biparental clones and full-sib families of the Chinese pine using SSR markers. Horticulturae 9 (11): 1205. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9111205.
Inouye BD, Ehrlén J, Underwood N. 2019. Phenology as a process rather than an event: From individual reaction norms to community metrics. Ecol Monogr 89 (2): e01352. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1352.
Jensen AM, Schamp BS, Belleau A. 2019. Evidence of temporal niche separation via low flowering time overlap in an old-field plant community. Oecologia 189 (4): 1071-1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04386-0.
Kalisz S, Vogler D, Fails B, Finer M, Shepard E, Herman T, Gonzales R. 1999. The mechanism of delayed selfing in Collinsia verna (Scrophulariaceae). Am J Bot 86 (9): 1239-1247. https://doi.org/10.2307/2656771.
Kampny CM. 1995. Pollination and flower diversity in Scrophulariaceae. Bot Rev 61: 350-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912622.
Kato M, Kosaka Y, Kawakita A, Okuyama Y, Kobayashi C, Phimminith T, Thongphan D. 2008. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical monsoon forests in Southeast Asia. Am J Bot 95 (11): 1375-1394. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0800114.
Kehrberger S, Holzschuh A. 2019. How does timing of flowering affect competition for pollinators, flower visitation and seed set in an early spring grassland plant? Sci Rep 9 (1): 15593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51916-0.
Kline O, Joshi NK. 2020. Mitigating the effects of habitat loss on solitary bees in agricultural ecosystems. Agriculture 10 (4): 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040115.
Kuswantoro F. 2017. Flower-insect visitor interaction: Case study on Rhododendron inundatum Sleumer in Bali Botanic Garden. J Trop Biodiv Biotech 2: 35-38. https://doi.org/10.22146/jtbb.25443.
Laha S, Chatterjee S, Das A, Smith BM, Basu P. 2020. Non-crop floral traits as determinants of bee visitation in a tropical agricultural landscape. Proc Zool Soc 73 (4): 441-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-019-00302-9.
Layek U, Das U, Karmakar P. 2022. The pollination efficiency of a pollinator depends on its foraging strategy, flowering phenology, and the flower characteristics of a plant species. J Asia-Pac Entomol 25 (2): 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2022.101882.
Li Y, Mamonova E, Köhler N, van Kleunen M, Stift M. 2023. Breakdown of self-incompatibility due to genetic interaction between a specific S-allele and an unlinked modifier. Nat Commun 14: 3420. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38802-0.
Lim Z, Lord J, Johnson S. 2025. Understanding foraging and nesting behaviour of ground nesting bees in Dunedin, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 49 (1): 3579. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.49.3579.
Ling TC, Wang LL, Zhang ZQ, Dafni A, Duan YW, Yang YP. 2017. High autonomous selfing capacity and low flower visitation rates in a subalpine population of Prunella vulgaris (Lamiaceae). Pl Ecol Evol 150 (1): 59-66. https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2017.1274.
Opedal Øystein H. 2023. A functional view of flower-pollinator trait matching. A commentary on ‘mismatching explained: Constricted corolla tubes in Roscoea elevate the nectar’. Ann Bot 132 (6): 5-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcad162.
Ornai A, Keasar T. 2020. Floral complexity traits as predictors of plant-bee interactions in a Mediterranean pollination web. Plants (Basel) 9 (11): 1432. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9111432.
Pant P, Singh VP, Panwar R, Jat R. 2020. Dichogamy and its relevance in fruit crops: An overview. Intl J Curr Microbiol App Sci 9 (8): 698-708. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.908.076.
Philcox D. 1970. A taxonomic revision of the genus Limnophila R. Br. (Scrophulariaceae). Kew Bull 24 (1): 101-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/4103255.
POWO. 2025. Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. https://powo.science.kew.org/.
Punchay K, Inta A, Tiansawat P, Balslev H, Wangpakapattanawong P. 2020. Traditional knowledge of wild food plants of Thai Karen and Lawa (Thailand). Genet Resour Crop Evol 67: 1277-1299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-020-00910-x.
Qi Y, Li J, Guan X, Yan B, Fu G, He J, Du L, Zhao C, Zhang D. 2020. Effects of herbicides on non-target plant species diversity and the community composition of fallow fields in northern China. Sci Rep 10: 9967. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67025-2.
Ren YQ, Xu YP, Zhang T, Ma YP, Marczewski T. 2016. Growth discrepancy between filament and style facilitates self-fertilization in Brandisia hancei (Paulowniaceae). Plant Species Biol 31 (2): 153-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12099.
Schlessman MA. 1986. Floral protogyny, self-competibility, and the pollination of Ourisia macrocarpa (Scrophulariaceae). N Z J Bot 24 (4): 651-656. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1986.10409948.
Schmid R. 1976. Fly pollination of Penstemon davidsonii and P. procerus (Scrophulariaceae). Madroño 23 (7): 400-402. https://doi.org/jstor.org/stable/41424070.
Serna-González M, Urrego‐Giraldo LE, Santa‐Ceballos JP, Suzuki‐Azuma H. 2022. Flowering, floral visitors and climatic drivers of reproductive phenology of two endangered magnolias from neo-tropical Andean forests. Plant Species Biol 37 (1): 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1442-1984.12351.
Solís-Montero L, Vallejo-Marín M. 2017. Does the morphological fit between flowers and pollinators affect pollen deposition? an experimental test in a buzz-pollinated species with anther dimorphism. Ecol Evol 7 (8): 2706-2715. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2897.
Stevens PF. 2025. Angiosperm Phylogeny. University of Missouri, St Louis, and Missouri Botanical Garden http://www.mobot.org/ MOBOT/research/APweb/.
Suetsugu K, Fukushima K, Makino T, Ikematsu S, Sakamoto T, Kimura S. 2023. Transcriptomic heterochrony and completely cleistogamous flower development in the mycoheterotrophic orchid Gastrodia. New Phytol 237 (1): 323-338. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18495.
Tepedino VJ, Sipes SD, Griswold TL. 1999. The reproductive biology and effective pollinators of the endangered beardtongue Penstemon penlandii (Scrophulariaceae). Pl Syst Evol 219: 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01090298.
van Doorn WG, Van Meeteren U. 2003. Flower opening and closure: A review. J Exp Bot 54 (389): 1801-1812. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg213.
Walsh SK, Pender RJ, Junker RR, Daehler CC, Morden CW, Lorence DH. 2019. Pollination biology reveals challenges to restoring populations of Brighamia insignis (Campanulaceae), a critically endangered plant species from Hawai'i. Flora 259: 151448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2019.151448.
Wang Z, Xie L, Prather CM, Guo H, Han G, Ma C. 2018. What drives the shift between sexual and clonal reproduction of Caragana stenophylla along a climatic aridity gradient? BMC Plant Biol 18 (1): 91. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1313-6.
Xu K. 2020. The coevolution of flower longevity and self-fertilization in hermaphroditic plants. Evolution 75 (8): 2114-2123. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14303.
Yamazaki T. 1990. Scrophulariaceae. In: Smitinand T, Larsen K (eds). Flora of Thailand. The Forest Herbarium, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Bangkok, Thailand.
Zhang D, Li YY, Zhao X, Zhang C, Liu DK, Lan S, Yin W, Liu ZJ. 2024. Molecular insights into self-incompatibility systems: from evolution to breeding. Plant Commun 5 (2): 100719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100719.
Zulkarnain Z, Eliyanti E, Swari EI. 2019. Pollen viability and stigma receptivity in Swainsona formosa (G.Don) J.Thompson (Fabaceae), an ornamental legume native to Australia. Ornam Hortic 25 (2): 158-167. https://doi.org/10.14295/oh.v25i2.2011.