Trees outside forest for Chure dry land conservation in Makawanpur District, Nepal

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

SANDESH BOLAKHE
PRAMOD GHIMIRE
PRASHANT PAUDEL
UCHITA LAMICHHANE

Abstract

Abstract. Bolakhe S, Ghimire P, Paudel P, Lamichhane U. 2024. Trees outside forest for Chure dry land conservation in Makawanpur District, Nepal. Intl J Trop Drylands 8: 106-113. Trees outside forest (TOF) are considered as a potential strategy to meet the needs for timber, fuel wood, fodder and fruits of growing population and crop diversification to address land management problems and ecological concerns. In this backdrop, this study attempts to explore the contribution of TOF to Chure dry land conservation in Hetauda Sub-metropolitan City, Nepal. Field observation, household surveys (n=123), and in-depth discussions with local key informants were conducted to extract information about TOFs. The study documented 27 species of trees outside forest. About 19 species were present per household distributed on different locations like home gardens, terrace raisers, borderlands etc. More than 80% of these trees found on farmlands were planted, and only a few were naturally retained. Fruit trees (jackfruit and mango) dominated, followed by fodder (Litsea and Ficus) and other multipurpose species. Among the naturally regenerated trees, multipurpose species were abundant (>45%) and myriad fruit species (>60%) were seen among those planted. TOFs contributed to more than 40% of annual demands for fuel wood, fodder and bedding materials, whereas timber and poles are extracted in comparatively less amount. Almost all of the respondents agreed upon the positive impacts of TOFs on crop production, greenery enhancement and adaptation against drought. More than 90% of the respondents were positive about enhancing TOF for land productivity optimization and reducing pressure on forest to conserve fragile ecosystem of Chure dry land.

2017-01-01

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Amatya SM, Cedamon E, Nuberg I. 2018. Agroforestry systems and practices in Nepal- Revised Eds. Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Nepal, 108pp + xviii.
Baral SK, Malla R, Khanal S, Shakya R. 2013.Trees on farms: diversity, carbon pool and contribution to rural livelihoods in Kanchanpur District, Nepal. Banko Janakari 23 (1): 3–11.
Beer J, Harvey CA, Ibrahim MA, Somarriba E, Harmand JM, Jiménez Otárola F. 2003. Service functions of agroforestry systems. In 12. World Forestry Congress. Quebec, Canadá, 2003, páginas 417-424.
Bishwokarma D, Thing SJ, Paudel NS. 2016. Political ecology of the Chure region in Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 14(1): 84-96.
FAO. 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. FAO Forestry Paper No. 140. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO. 2002. Trees Outside Forests, A Key Factor in Integrated Urban and Rural Management.
Ghimire M, Khanal A, Bhatt D, Dahal D,Giri S. 2024. Agroforestry systems in Nepal: Enhancing food security and rural livelihoods–a comprehensive review. Food and Energy Security 13(1), e524. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.524
Ghimire P, Bolakhe S. 2020. Agroforestry systems: Biodiversity, carbon stocks and contribution to rural livelihood. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University 4(1):197–205. https://doi.org/10.3126/jafu.v4i1.4707
Ghimire P, Paudel P, Bhatta B, Gautam P, Devkota N. 2020. Importance of Trees Outside Forest (TOF) for immediate earthquake response. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management 6(1): 9-16.
Garrity DA, Okono GM, Parrott S. 2006. World Agroforestry into the Future. Nairobi: World Agroforestry Centre.
Giri N. 2004. Assessment of tree resources outside forests: a lesson from Tanzania. Banko Janakari 14 (2):46–52.
Hetauda sub-metropolitan city office. 2018. Annual Report of Hetauda Sub-metropolitan City Office, Fiscal year 2017-2018. Available on: https://hetaudamun.gov.np/ne
Idol T, Hagger J, Cox L.2011. Ecosystem services from smallholder forestry and agroforestry in the tropics. In W. B. Campbell & S. L. Oritz (Eds.), Integrating agriculture, conservation and ecotourism: example from the field (pp. 209– 270). Dordrecht: Springer.
Jose S. 2009. Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental bene?ts: an overview. Agroforestry Syst 76: 1-10, Springer.
Lamichhane U, Ghimire P. 2023. Agroforestry: Enhancing Farm Tree Diversity and its Role in Rural Livelihoods. Agrobiodiversity & Agroecology 03(02): 19-33. https://doi.org/10.33002/aa030202
Lasco RD, Delfino RJP, Catacutan DC, Simelton ES, Wilson DM. 2014. Climate risk adaptation by smallholder farmers: the roles of trees and agroforestry. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6: 83-88.
Oli BN. 2002. Trees outside forests: an ignored dimension of forest resource assessment. Banko Janakari 12 (1): 79–81.
Pain-Orcet M, Bellefontaine R. 2004. Trees outside the forest: A new perspective on the management of forest resources in the tropics. In: Babin, D. (ed. Beyond Tropical Deforestation. Paris: UNESCO/CIRAD, pp. 423-430.
Paudel P, Rimal S, Ghimire P, Parajuli K. 2019. Agro-forestry for enhancing adaptation of local community against drought in hilly region of Nepal. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 7(4): 440-445.
Plieninger T. 2011. Capitalizing on the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry in Germany's Agricultural Landscapes: Realigning the Climate Change Mitigation and Landscape Conservation Agendas. Landscape Research 36: 435-454.
Rawat JK, Dasgupta S, Rajesh K, Anoop K, Chauhan KVS. 2003. Training manual on inventory of trees outside forests (TOF). FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand.
Singh BK. 2017. Land tenure and conservation in Chure. Journal of forest and livelihood, 15(1):87-102.