Monitoring and analyzing tree diversity using i-Tree eco to strengthen urban forest management

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

AMARIZNI MOSYAFTIANI
ADE WAHYU
KASWANTO KASWANTO
HARITYAS WIYOGA
NADA SYASITA
ARIE FAJAR SEPTA
DJAYUS DJAUHARI

Abstract

Abstract. Mosyaftiani A, Wahyu A, Kaswanto, Wiyoga H, Syasita N, Septa AF, Djauhari D. 2022. Monitoring and analyzing tree diversity using i-Tree eco to strengthen urban forest management. Biodiversitas 23: 4033-4039. Inadequate data on vegetation growth makes it difficult for managers to determine the additional measures necessary for effective urban forest management. The management of urban forests in Jakarta also raises this issue. Collaborative research with multiple stakeholders was conducted in five Jakarta urban forests to assess the diversity and structure of the vegetation as a basis for long-term monitoring and management. Using 49 plots, we carried out a field inventory to gather information on tree number, diameter at breast height, tree height, and crown size. The i-Tree Eco programme was used to examine the data and information gathered. The widely used i-Tree Eco analysis was conducted to make viable evidence-based evaluation feasible and to help stakeholders with data processing. The results showed that the five urban forests had a moderate level of diversity, with an index value ranging from 2.1 to 3.0. The five most common tree species—Swietenia macrophylla, Terminalia sp., Delonix regia, Ceiba pentandra, and Aleurites moluccanus—dominate urban forests, whereas three of them are exotic and most native species have substantially lower values. Increasing tree diversity by enriching native species is recommended to be a top priority for urban forest management in Jakarta. Additionally, this research shows that adopting advanced and user-friendly tools to regularly monitor and analyze vegetation helps stakeholders achieve better urban forest management.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Edwards PJ. 2017. Ecosystem services in urban landscapes. In: The 5th Centre for Liveable Cities’ Roundtable (CLC 2017) [Internet]. [place unknown]: Singapore-ETH Centre (SEC). https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/127623
i-Tree. 2021. i-Tree Eco User’s Manual [Internet]. https://www.itreetools.org/documents/275/EcoV6_UsersManual.2021.09.22.pdf
Kim G. 2016. Assessing Urban Forest Structure, Ecosystem Services, and Economic Benefits on Vacant Land. Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 8(7):679.
Kurniastuti AE. 2013. Pengelolaan Hutan Kota di Jakarta (Studi Kasus Hutan Kota Srengseng di Jakarta Barat). Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah dan Kota. 9(4):439–450.
Magarik YAS, Roman LA, Henning JG. 2020. How should we measure the DBH of multi-stemmed urban trees? Urban For Urban Greening. 47:126481.
Markho RK, Herlambang S, Rahardjo P, Santoso S. 2020. Evaluasi Kelayakan Hutan Kota Studi Kasus Hutan Kota Srengseng, Jakarta Barat. j.sains.teknol.n.a.arsit.indones. 2(2):2731.
Martin N, Chappelka A, Keever G, Loewenstein E. 2011. A 100% tree inventory using i-Tree Eco protocol: A case study at Auburn University, Alabama, U.s. Arboric Urban For. 37(5):207–212.
Morgenroth J, Nowak D, Koeser A. 2020. DBH Distributions in America’s Urban Forests—An Overview of Structural Diversity. Forests [Internet]. 11(2):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11020135
Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Hoehn RE, Walton JT, Bond J. 2008. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Aboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(6): 347-358 [Internet]. [accessed 2022 Mar 21] 34(6). https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/19526
Nowak DJ, Maco S, Binkley M. 2018. i-Tree: Global tools to assess tree benefits and risks to improve forest management. Arboricultural Consultant 51(4): 10-13. 51(4):10–13.
Pretzsch H, Moser-Reischl A, Rahman MA, Pauleit S, Rötzer T. 2021. Towards sustainable management of the stock and ecosystem services of urban trees. From theory to model and application. Trees [Internet]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-021-02100-3
Roeland S, Moretti M, Amorim JH, Branquinho C, Fares S, Morelli F, Niinemets Ü, Paoletti E, Pinho P, Sgrigna G, et al. 2019. Towards an integrative approach to evaluate the environmental ecosystem services provided by urban forest. Res J For. 30(6):1981–1996.
Templeton LK, Neel MC, Groffman PM, Cadenasso ML, Sullivan JH. 2019. Changes in vegetation structure and composition of urban and rural forest patches in Baltimore from 1998 to 2015. For Ecol Manage. 454:117665.
Wright RT. 2007. Environmental science: toward a sustainable future. [place unknown]: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Yannelli FA, Bazzichetto M, Conradi T, Pattison Z, Andrade BO, Anibaba QA, Bonari G, Chelli S, ?uk M, Damasceno G, et al. 2022. Fifteen emerging challenges and opportunities for vegetation science: A horizon scan by early career researchers. J Veg Sci [Internet]. 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.13119