Limnonectes from Enggano Island (Indonesia) with comments on its taxonomic status

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ADE DAMARA GONGGOLI
VESTIDHIA YUNISYA ATMAJA
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2748-3017
AHMAD MUAMMAR KADAFI
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-687X
EVY AYU ARIDA
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7604-390X
AMIR HAMIDY
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6426-7458

Abstract


Abstract. Gonggoli AD, Atmajaya VY, Kadafi AM, Arida EA, Hamidy A. 2023. Limnonectes from Enggano Island (Indonesia) with comments on its taxonomic status. Biodiversitas 24: 473-480. Limnonectes shompenorum is a fanged frog known to be distributed in the satellite islands of the western coast of Sumatra and some parts of mainland Sumatra. This frog was also recorded in Enggano Island, but the taxonomic status and morphological data information still need to be studied. Herein, we examined L. shompenorum from Enggano Island based on molecular methods using the 16S rRNA gene and redescribed its morphological characters. The phylogenetic trees were constructed using Neighbor-Joining (NJ), Maximum Likelihood (ML), and Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis, and morphological measurements were taken using 23 characters. The results demonstrate that L. shompenorum is a monophyletic group and a sister taxon of L. macrodon. The monophyletic group of L. shompenorum consists of two clades (A and B) with relatively large genetic distances within the population (0.00-5.10%), representing distinct interspecific lineages. Clade A consists of the Enggano population with a genetic distance within the population of 0.00-0.48%, and clade B consists of the Mentawai Islands and Mainland Sumatra with a genetic distance within the population of 1.48-2.74%. The Enggano population is closer to the Mentawai population (2.47-2.74%) than the Sumatra population (3.52-5.10%). Our genetic data aligns with previous studies that indicate the Enggano population possibly comes from the Mentawai population. Morphologically, L. shompenorum from Enggano Island is similar to the original description, however it has consistent, distinctive characteristics by having the fourth finger longer than the second finger in females. Further research using broader molecular data, including the holotype population, is needed to confirm the taxonomic status of L. shompenorum.


##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Chandramouli SR. 2020. First Description of a Male Shompen Frog, Limnonectes shompenorum Das 1996, with Notes on Distribution. Reptiles & Amphibians 27(2): 235–236. DOI:10.17161/randa.v27i2.14189
Che J, Hu J, Zhou W, Murphy RW, Papenfuss TJ, Chen M, Rao D, Li P, Zhang Y. 2009. Phylogeny of the Asian spiny frog tribe Paini (Family Dicroglossidae) sensu Dubois. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50(1): 59–73. DOI:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.10.007
Das I. 1996. Limnonectes shompenorum, a new species of ranid frog of the Rana macrodon complex from Great Nicobar, India. Journal of South Asian Natural History 2(1): 127–134.
Emerson SB, Inger RF, Iskandar DT. 2000. Molecular systematics and biogeography of the fanged frogs of Southeast Asia. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16(1): 131–142.
Emerson SB, Ward R. 1998. Male secondary sexual characteristics, sexual selection, and molecular divergence in fanged ranid frogs of Southeast Asia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 122(4): 537–553. DOI:10.1006/mpev.2000.0778
Fouquet A, Gilles A, Vences M, Marty C, Blanc M, Gemmell NJ. 2007. Underestimation of Species Richness in Neotropical Frogs Revealed by mtDNA Analyses e1109(10): 1–10. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001109
Frost DR. 2022. Amphibian Species of the World. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org.
Haas A, Boon-Hee K, Joseph A, Asri Mb, Das I, Hagmann R, Schwander L, Hertwig ST. 2018. An updated checklist of the amphibian diversity of Maliau Basin Conservation Area, Sabah, Malaysia. Evolutionary Systematics 2(1): 89–114. DOI:10.3897/evolsyst.2.27020
Harikrishnan S, Vasudevan K. 2018. Amphibians of the Andaman & Nicobar Islands: distribution, natural history, and notes on taxonomy. Alytes 36: 238–265.
Hasan M, Islam MM, Khan MMR, Igawa T, Alam MS, Djong HT, Kurniawan N, Joshy H, Sen YH, Belabut DM, Kurabayashi A, Kuramoto M, Sumida M. 2014. Genetic divergences of South and Southeast Asian frogs: A case study of several taxa based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene data with notes on the generic name Fejervarya. Turkish Journal of Zoology 38(4): 389–411. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1308-36
Hoang DT, Chernomor O, Haeseler Av, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. 2017. UFBoot2?: Improving the Ultrafast Bootstrap Approximation 35(2): 518–522. DOI:10.1093/molbev/msx281
Huelsenbeck Jp, Hillis DM. 1993. Success of Phylogenetic Methods in the Four-Taxon Case. Syst. Biol 42(3): 247–264. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/42.3.247
Inger RF, Iskandar DT. (2005). A collection of amphibians from west Sumatra, with description of a new species of Megophrys (Amphibia: Anura). Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 53(1): 133–142.
Inger RF, Stuart BL. 2010. Systematics of Limnonectes (Taylorana) Dubois. Current Herpetology 29(2): 51–68. DOI:10.3105/018.029.0201
Kurniawan N, Djong TH, Maideliza T, Hamidy A, Hasan M, Igawa T, Sumida M. 2014. Genetic Divergence and Geographic Distribution of Frogs In Genus Fejervarya From Indonesia Inferred From Mitochondrial 16s rRNA Gene Analysis. Treubia 41: 1-16. DOI:10.14203/treubia.v41i0.361
Lawalata SZS. 2011. Historical Biogeography of Sumatra and Western Archipelago, Indonesia: Insights from the flying lizards in the genus Draco (Iguania: Agamidae). [Dissertation]. University of California, Berkeley.
Leache A, Reeder TW. 2002. Molecular Systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): A Comparison of Parsimony, Likelihood, and Bayesian Approaches. Syst. Biol 51(1): 44–68. DOI:10.1080/106351502753475871
Matsui M. (1994). A taxonomic study of the Rana narina complex, with description of three new species (Amphibia: Ranidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 111(4): 385–415. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1994.tb01489.x
Matsui M. (1984). Morphometric Variation Analyses and Revision of the Japanese Toads (Genus Bufo, Bufonidae). Contr Biol Lab. Kyoto Univ 26: 209–428.
Matsui M, Kuraishi N, Jiang JP, Ota H, Hamidy A, Orlov NL, Nishikawa K. 2010. Systematic reassessments of fanged frogs from China and adjacent regions (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Zootaxa 42(2345): 33–42. DOI:10.11646/zootaxa.2345.1.3
Matsui M, Nishimura T, Eto K, Kuraishi N, Hamidy A, Nishikawa K, Sudin A. 2015. Genetic divergence in a Bornean fanged frog Limnonectes leporinus (Dicroglossidae, Anura). Current Herpetology 34(1): 28–37. DOI:10.5358/hsj.34.28
McLeod D, Horner SJ, Husted C, Barley A, Iskandar DT. 2011. “Same-same, but different”: An unusual new species of the Limnonectes kuhlii Complex from West Sumatra (Anura: Dicroglossidae). Zootaxa 2883: 52–64. DOI:10.11646/zootaxa.2883.1.4
Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 14: 1-8.
Rambaut A. 2012. A graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees. Institute of Evolutionary Biology University of Edinburgh. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree.
Roelants K, Jiang J, Bossuyt F. 2004. Endemic ranid (Amphibia: Anura) genera in southern mountain ranges of the Indian subcontinent represent ancient frog lineages: evidence from molecular data. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 31(2004): 730-740. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.09.011
Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12): 1572–1574. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
Sarkar AK. 1990. Taxonomic and ecological studies on the amphibians of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Rec Zool Surv India 86:103-117. DOI: 10.26515/rzsi/v86/i1/1990/161682
Savage JM, Heyer WR. 1997. Digital webbing formula for Anurans: a refinement. Herpetological Review 3(28): 113-144.
Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. 2021. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38(7): 3022–3027. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msab120
Tanabe AS. (2011). Kakusan4 and Aminosan: Two programs for comparing nonpartitioned, proportional and separate models for combined molecular phylogenetic analyses of multilocus sequence data. Molecular Ecology Resources 11(5): 914–921. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03021.x
Teynié A, David P, Ohler A. 2010. Note on a collection of Amphibians and Reptiles from Western Sumatra. Zootaxa 2416: 1–43. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.194395
Tjong DH, Iskandar DT, Gusman D. 2010. Hubungan Filogenetik Spesies Limnonectes (Ranidae: Amphibia) Asal Sumatera Barat dan Asal Asia Tenggara Berdasarkan Gen 16S Ribosomal RNA. Makara Sains 14(1): 79-87 (Indonesian). DOI: 10.7454/mss.v14i1.463
Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L, Haeseler Av. Minh B. Q. 2016. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 14: W222-W234. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkw256
Vinciguerra D. 1892. Annali del museo civico di storia naturale. In Annali Del Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale 12(2): 517–526 (Italia).