Estimating the visitor’s willingness to pay towards biodiversity conservation at Kuala Lumpur Forest Eco Park, Malaysia, using the Contingent Valuation Method

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

FAZILAH MUSA
INTAN NURSUHADA MOHD SHAHRUDIN

Abstract

Abstract. Musa F, Shahrudin INM. 2023. Estimating the visitor’s willingness to pay towards biodiversity conservation at Kuala Lumpur Forest Eco Park, Malaysia, using the Contingent Valuation Method. Biodiversitas 24: 3690-3699. The Kuala Lumpur Forest Eco Park is within the Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve, Malaysia's oldest and most biodiverse hill dipterocarp forest. The destruction of urban greenery in the heart of Kuala Lumpur has prompted stakeholders to conserve this forest as urban ecotourism areas for recreational, educational, and research activities. Due to the absence of a market, the economic value of biodiversity cannot be quantified in monetary terms from an economic perspective. Therefore, it will be difficult for stakeholders to justify the cost of conservation in their management in the future. This study's objective was to determine the economic value of biodiversity conservation at Kuala Lumpur Forest Eco Park by determining a visitor's Willingness to Pay (WTP) using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). A total of 250 questionnaires were distributed randomly to both international and domestic tourists to conduct this study. Five bid prices were chosen for domestic and international visitors based on the Logit Model's estimation of the visitor's WTP for biodiversity conservation. This study indicates that most visitors are willing to pay for biodiversity conservation influenced by religion, marital status, income, employment, and education. Furthermore, the results indicate that the WTP's mean and median per visit are MYR3.81 and MYR2.58 based on domestic visitor data. Consequently, this research may aid decision-makers in managing the financial strategy for biodiversity conservation activities. Thus, the conservation fee that visitors can accept based on their willingness to pay will further boost visitors' future visits to the Kuala Lumpur Forest Eco Park.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Abdullah M, Mamat MP, Yaacob MR, Radam A, Fui LH. 2015. Estimate the conservation value of biodiversity in national heritage site: A case of Forest Research Institute Malaysia. Proceed Environ Sci 30: 180-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.032.
Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J. 1998. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am J Agric Econ 80 (1): 64-75. DOI: 10.2307/3180269.
Adamu A, Yacob MR, Radam A, Hashim R. 2015. Factors determining visitors' willingness to pay for conservation in Yankari Game Reserve, Bauchi, Nigeria. Intl J Econ Manag 9: 95-114.
Ali H, Dermawan D, Ali N, Ibrahim M, Yaacob S. 2012. Society and the practise of solid waste management towards sustainable community: The case of female households in Bandar Baru Bangi, Malaysia. Geogr-Malays J Soc Space 8 (5): 64-75. [Malaysian]
Amirnejad H, Khalilian S, Assareh MH, Ahmadian M. 2006. Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a Contingent Valuation Method. Ecol Econ 58 (4): 665-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.08.015.
Ariyo OC, Okojie LO, Ariyo MO. 2018. Villagers willingness to pay for forest conservation in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Asian J Agric Ext Econ Soc 23 (4): 1-14. DOI: 10.9734/AJAEES/2018/40142.
Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H, Radner R, Leamer EE, Solow R. 1993. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Regist 58 (10): 4601-4614.
Aseres SA, Sira RK. 2020. Estimating visitors' willingness to pay for a conservation fund: Sustainable financing approach in protected areas in Ethiopia. Heliyon 6 (8): e04500. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04500.
Azlina AA, Kamaludin M, Sin MS. 2018. Willingness to pay for renewable energy: Evidence from Malaysian’s households. J Ekon Malays 52 (3): 153-161. DOI: 10.17576/JEM-2018-5203-11.
Bamwesigye D, Hlavackova P, Sujova A, Fialova J, Kupec P. 2020. Willingness to pay for forest existence value and sustainability. Sustainability 12 (3): 891. DOI: 10.3390/su12030891.
Baral N, Dhungana A. 2014. Diversifying finance mechanisms for protected areas capitalizing on untapped revenues. For Policy Econ 41: 60-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.01.002.
Baral N, Stern MJ, Bhattarai R. 2008. Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal: Implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecol Econ 66 (2-3): 218-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.02.004.
Boo C-S. 2019. A study of the economic valuation of the Saryeoni forest path utilising the Contingent Valuation Method. Glob Bus Finance Rev 24 (3): 51-64. DOI: 10.17549/gbfr.2019.24.3.51.
Carmines EG, Zeller RA. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA. DOI: 10.4135/9781412985642.
Carson RT, Flores NE, Meade NF. 2001. Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environ Resour Econ 19: 173-210. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011128332243.
Carson RT. 2000. Contingent valuation: A user's guide. Environ Sci Technol 34 (8): 1413-1418. DOI: 10.1021/es990728j.
Challcharoenwattana A, Pharino C. 2016. Wishing to finance a recycling program? Willingness-to-pay study for enhancing municipal solid waste recycling in urban settlements in Thailand. Habitat Intl 51: 23-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.008.
Collins D, Tisdell C. 2002. Gender and differences in travel life cycles. J Travel Res 41 (2): 133-143. DOI: 10.1177/004728702237413.
Department of Town and Country Planning Peninsular Malaysia. 2014. Pemuliharaan dan Pembangunan Kawasan Sensitif Alam Sekitar (KSAS) Hutan Simpan Kekal. Garis Panduan Perancangan. [Malaysian]
Dickinson DL, Whitehead JC. 2015. Dubious and dubiouser: Contingent valuation and the time of day. Econ Inq 53 (2): 1396-1400. DOI: 10.1111/ecin.12161.
Endreny TA. 2018. Strategically growing the urban forest will improve our world. Nat Commun 9 (1): 1160. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03622-0.
Ezebilo EE, Sandström C, Ericsson G. 2012. Browsing damage by moose in Swedish forests: Assessments by hunters and foresters. Scand J For Res 27 (7): 659-668. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2012.698643.
Fadhlin MHN, Matthew NK, Shuib A. 2021. Visitors’ willingness to pay for entrance fee at Puncak Janing Forest Eco-Park, Kedah, Malaysia. J Trop For Sci 33 (1): 49-57. DOI: 10.26525/jtfs2021.33.1.49.
Forestry Department of Peninsular Malaysia. 2018. Retrieved at: https://www.forestry.gov.my/index.php/my/ Accessed on 1st March 2019.
Ghous M, Siddiqui S. 2022. 47 c assessment of willingness to pay for sustainable ecotourism development in the Salt Range Wetlands, Punjab Pakistan. Intl J Econ Environ Geol 13 (2): 47-51. DOI: 10.46660/ijeeg.v13i2.30.
Halim AA, Othman N, Ismail SR, Jawan JA, Ibrahim NN. 2012. Indigenous knowledge and biodiversity conservation in Sabah, Malaysia. Intl J Soc Sci Humanit 2 (2): 159-163. DOI: 10.7763/IJSSH.2012.V2.88.
Hanley N, MacMillan D, Wright RE, Bullock C, Simpson I, Parsisson D, Crabtree B. 1998. Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland. J of Agric Econ 49 (1): 1-15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01248.x.
Hasan-Basri B, Samdin Z, Noor Ghani A. 2020. Willingness to pay for conserving mangrove forest in Kuala Perlis, Malaysia: A double bounded contingent valuation method. J Ekon Malays 54 (3): 89-99. DOI: 10.17576/JEM-2020-5403-7.
Hassin NH, Koshy N, Hambali K, Kumaran JV. 2020. Local communities willingness to pay for conservation of ecotourism resources at Gelam Forest, Kelantan, Malaysia. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 549 (1): 012090. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/549/1/012090.
Heal G. 2000. Valuing ecosystem services. Ecosystems 3: 24-30. DOI: 10.1007/s100210000006.
Hinton PR, Brownlow C, Mcmurray I Cozens B. 2004. SPSS Explained. East Sussex, Routledge Inc, England. DOI: 10.4324/9780203642597.
Huck SW. 2007. Reading Statistics and Research. Allyn and Bacon, United States of America.
Iasha A, Yacob MR, Kabir I, Radam A. 2015. Estimating economic value for potential ecotourism resources in Puncak Lawang Park, Agam district, West Sumatera, Indonesia. Proceed Environ Sci 30: 326-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.058.
Jin J, Rui H, Wenyu W, Haozhou G. 2018. Valuing cultivated land protection: A contingent valuation and choice experiment study in China. Land Use Policy 74: 214-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.023.
Johnston RJ, Boyle KJ, Adamowicz W, Bennett J, Brouwer R, Cameron TA, Hanemann WM, Hanley N, Ryan M, Scarpa R, Tourangeau R, Vossler CA. 2017. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 4 (2): 319-405. DOI: 10.1086/691697.
Kamaludin M, Azlina AA, Wan Talaat, WIA. 2021. Economic valuation of Borneo Orangutans at Kemaman Zoo and recreation park in Terengganu, Malaysia. Iran Econ Rev 25 (4): 641-653. DOI: 10.22059/IER.2021.85080.
Kamri T. 2013. Willingness to pay for conservation of natural resources in the Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak. Proc-Soc Behav Sci 101: 506-515. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.224.
Kanniah KD, Siong HC. 2017. Urban forest cover change and sustainability of Malaysian cities. Chem Eng Trans 56: 673-678. DOI: 10.3303/CET1756113.
Karjoko L, Winarno DW, Rosidah ZN, Handayani IGAKR. 2020. Spatial planning dysfunction in East Kalimantan to support green economy. Intl J Innov Creat Chang 11 (8): 259-269.
Karuppannan S, Baharuddin ZM, Sivam A, Daniels CB. 2014. Urban green space and urban biodiversity: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. J Sustain Dev 7 (1): 1-16. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v7n1p1.
Kawangit RM, Don AG, Hamjah SH, Sham FM, Nasir BM, Ashaari MF, Tibek SR, Ismail Z, Endot I, Puteh A, Ismail A, Ghani MZA. 2012. The history of ethnic relationship in Malaysia. Adv Nat Appl Sci 6 (4): 504-510.
Lee C-K, Han S-Y. 2002. Estimating the use and preservation values of national parks’ tourism resources using a contingent valuation method. Tour Manag 23 (5): 531-540. DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00010-9.
López-Mosquera N, Sánchez M. 2012. Theory of planned behavior and the value-belief-norm theory explaining willingness to pay for a suburban park. J Environ Manag 113: 251-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.029.
Mamat MP, Yacob MR, Radam A, Ghani ANA, Fui LH. 2013. Willingness to pay for protecting natural environments in Pulau Redang Marine Park, Malaysia. Afr J Bus Manag 7 (25): 2420-2426. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM10.752.
Maryanti MR, Khadijah H, Uzair AM, Ghazali MMM. 2017. The urban green space provision using the standards approach: Issues and challenges of its implementation in Malaysia. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 210: 369-379. DOI: 10.2495/SDP160311.
Matthew NK, Shuib A, Ramachandran S, Mohammad-Afandi SH. 2019. Economic valuation using Travel Cost Method (TCM) in Kilim Karst Geoforest Park, Langkawi, Malaysia. J Trop For Sci 31 (1): 78-89. DOI: 10.26525/jtfs2019.31.1.078089.
Mohd-Asri NF, Kamaluddin SN, Dharmalingam S, Idris WMR, Zain BMM. 2021. Valuing ecotourism in Bukit Merah Orang Utan Island, Malaysia based on visitors' experience. Biodiversitas 22 (3): 1543-1549. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d220360.
Mohd-Hafiz H. 2019. Personal communication.
Mosbah A, Saleh AAKM. 2014. A review of tourism development in Malaysia. Eur J Bus Manag 6 (5): 1-9.
Musa F, Darman D. 2022. The Contingent Valuation Method contributes solutions for wildlife conservation: A case study at the Sepilok Orangutan Rehabilitation Centre in Borneo, Malaysia. Integr Environ Assess Manag 18 (5): 1174-1186. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4655.
Musa F, Fozi NM, Mohd Hamdan DD. 2020. Coastal communities’ willingness to pay for mangrove ecotourism in Maradu Bay, Sabah, Malaysia. J Sustain Sci Manag 15 (4): 130-140. DOI: 10.46754/jssm.2020.06.013.
Musa F, Nadarajah R. 2023. Valuing visitor’s willingness to pay for green tourism conservation: A case study of Bukit Larut Forest Recreation Area, Perak, Malaysia. Sustain Environ 9 (1): 2188767. DOI: 10.1080/27658511.2023.2188767.
Musa F, Nasir NSA, Jaunis O, Hamdan DDM. 2021. Exploring tourists’ knowledge, perceptions and willingness to pay on biodiversity conservation: Insights from Kinabalu Park, Borneo. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 736 (1): 012045. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/736/1/012045.
Nath TK, Magendran M. 2020. Urban community forest in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: current management, public uses and willingness toward conservation. J Sustain For 40 (8): 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2020.1796709.
National Forestry Policy. 1978. Retrieved at: http://www.kats.gov.my/msmy/PustakaMedia/Penerbitan/Dasar%20Perhutanan%20Negara.pdf Accessed on 12th February 2019.
Nelson KM, Partelow S, Stäbler M, Graci S, Fujitani M. 2021. Tourist willingness to pay for local green hotel certification. PLoS One 16 (2): e0245953. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245953.
Nguyen LH, Hoang ATD .2017. Willingness to pay for social health insurance in central Vietnam. Front Public Health 5: 89. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00089.
Ostoi? SK, van den Bosch CCK, Vuleti? D, Stevanov M, Živojinovi? I, Mutabdžija-Be?irovi? S, Lazarevi? J, Stojanova B, Blagojevi? D, Stojanovska M, Neveni? R, Malovrh ŠP. 2017. Citizens’ perception of and satisfaction with urban forests and green space: Results from selected Southeast European cities. Urban For Urban Green 23: 93-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.005.
Pedroso R, Kung’u JB. 2019. Tourists’willingness to pay for upstream restoration and conservation measures. J Sustain Tour 27 (8): 1107-1124. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2019.1593991.
Penn JM, Hu W. 2018. Understanding hypothetical bias: An enhanced meta?analysis. Am J Agric Econ 100 (4): 1186-1206. DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aay021.
Platania M, Rizzo M. 2018. Willingness to pay for protected areas: A case of Etna Park. Ecol Indic 93: 201-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.079.
Rahman AA, Hussain FNT, Ismail SM. 2017. Residents willingness to pay for conservation of green spaces and amenities at Urban Forest Bukit Nanas, Kuala Lumpur. Intl J Malay World Civilis (Iman), 5 (Special Issue 1): 81-86. DOI: 10.17576/IMAN-2017-05SI1-11.
Ramli F, Samdin Z, Ghani ANA. 2017. Willingness to pay for conservation fee using contingent valuation method: The case of Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Perak, Malaysia. Malays For 80 (1): 99-110.
Robinson J. 2009. Triandis Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour in Understanding Software Privace Behaviour in the South African Context. [Thesis]. University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. [South African]
Salleh N, Azeman S, Kiew R, Kamin I, Kong RCC. 2017. Plant checklist of the Bukit Nanas Forest Reserve, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. One Ecosyst 2: e13708. DOI: 10.3897/oneeco.2.e13708.
Samdin Z, Aziz YA, Radam A, Yacob MR. 2010. Factors influencing the willingness to pay for entrance permit: The evidence from Taman Negara National Park. J Sustain Dev 3 (3): 212-220. DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v3n3p212.
Samdin Z. 2008. Willingness to pay in Taman Negara: A Contingent Valuation Method. Intl J Econ Manag 2 (1): 81-94.
Sapari MS, Shuib A, Ramachandran S, Afandi SHM. 2013. Visitors’ satisfaction towards service and facilities in Kilim Karst Geoforest Park, Langkawi. J Appl Econ Bus 1 (4): 25-42.
Schutgens MG, Hanson JH, Baral N, Ale SB. 2019. Visitors’ willingness to pay for snow leopard Panthera uncia, conservation in the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Oryx 53 (4): 633-642. DOI: 10.1017/S0030605317001636.
Sica E, Sisto R, di Santo N. 2022. Are potential tourists willing to pay more for improved accessibility? Preliminary evidence from the Gargano national park. Land 11 (1): 75. DOI: 10.3390/land11010075.
Sisto R, Cappelletti GM, Bianchi P, Sica E. 2022. Sustainable and accessible tourism in natural areas: A participatory approach. Curr Issues Tour 25 (8): 1307-1324. DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2021.1920002.
Sobhee SK. 2008. Tourists’ willingness to pay and sustainable tourism policies in Mauritius. Intl Rev Bus Res Papers 4 (3): 178-191.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Publishers, Boston.
Taherdoost H. 2016. Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. Intl J Acad Res Manag (IJARM) 5 (3): 28-36. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3205040.
Tejada JJ, Punzalan JRB. 2012. On the misuse of Slovin's formula. Philipp Stat 61 (1): 129-136.
Togridou A, Hovardas T, Pantis JD. 2006. Determinants of visitors' willingness to pay for the National Marine Park of Zakynthos, Greece. Ecol Econ 60 (1): 308-319. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.006.
Truong DD. 2022. Community awareness and participation in biodiversity conservation at Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Vietnam. Biodiversitas 23 (1): 581-592. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d230163.
Tverijonaite E, Ólafsdóttir R, Thorsteinsson T. 2018. Accessibility of protected areas and visitor behaviour: A case study from Iceland. J Outdoor Recreat Tour 24: 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2018.09.001.
United Nations. 2020a. The 17 Goals. Retrieved at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals Accessed on 24th April 2020.
United Nations. 2020b. The 17 Goals. Retrieved at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal15 Accessed on 24th April 2020.
van der Jagt APN, Lawrence A. 2019. Local government and urban forest governance: Insights from Scotland. Scand J For Res 34 (1): 53-66. DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2018.1532018.
Wang P-W, Jia J-B. 2012. Tourists’ willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation and environment protection, Dalai Lake protected area: Implications for entrance fee and sustainable management. Ocean Coast Manag 62: 24-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.03.001.
Wen YF, Huang YT. 2018. Study on the background and trust factors of willing to buy the energy option. Asia Pac Manag Rev 24 (3): 250-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.07.004.
Whitley BE. 2002. Principals of Research and Behavioural Science. McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Witt B. 2019. Tourists’ willingness to pay increased entrance fees at Mexican protected areas: A multi-site contingent valuation study. Sustainability 11 (11): 3041. DOI: 10.3390/su11113041.
Yeo SC, Noor AAG, Lee PC. 2013. The estimation of economic benefits of urban trees using contingent valuation method in Tasik Perdana, Kuala Lumpur. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci 36 (1): 99-113.
Yu B, Cai Y, Jin L, Du B. 2018. Effects on willingness to pay for marine conservation: Evidence from Zhejiang Province, China. Sustainability 10 (7): 2298. DOI: 10.3390/su10072298.
Zaiton S, Huda-Farhana MM, Hasan-Basri B. 2019. Conversation of mangroves in Kuala Perlis, Malaysia: A case study of socio-economic attributes of fishermen driving valuation in sustaining livelihoods through forest management. J Trop For Sci 31 (4): 433-442. DOI: 10.26525/jtfs2019.31.4.433.