Agronomic and morphological characteristics of two rice genotypes plant in open land and under two years of sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria)

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

DULBARI
ZAINAL MUTAQIN
HERY SUTRISNO
NI SILUH PUTU NURYANTI
YURIANSYAH
DENNY SUDRAJAT
DESTIEKA AHYUNI
HIDAYAT SAPUTRA
LINA BUDIARTI
PRIYADI
FAJAR ROCHMAN
RIZKY RAHMADI
MUHAMMAD ALAM FIRMANSYAH
SAIJO

Abstract

Abstract. Dulbari, Mutaqin Z, Sutrisno H, Nuryanti NSP, Yuriansyah, Sudrajat D, Ahyuni D, Saputra H, Budiarti L, Priyadi, Rochman F, Rahmadi R, Firmansyah MA, Saijo. 2023. Agronomic and morphological characteristics of two rice genotypes plant in open land and under two years of sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria). Biodiversitas 24: 4927-4933. The increase in population is the biggest challenge for the agricultural sector in providing food needs. The main problem in increasing food production in Indonesia is the limited agricultural land. There is a need to explore alternative land options to address this issue and enhance production capacity, specifically for rice at the national level. One of the potential solutions is to use land currently occupied by plantation crops and forests that can be managed through agroforestry. Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria (L) I.C.Nielsen) is a forestry plant that offers a comparative advantage for investigation in agroforestry systems due to its relatively open canopy cover and classification as a legume. Therefore, this research aimed to determine the response of the morphological and agronomic characters of two rice genotypes planted in open land under 2-year-old sengon stands. The experiment was conducted from October 2017 to March 2018 in the Sengon community forest of Cikarawang, Bogor, with coordinates 06° 33.061' S and 106° 43.987' E. The results showed that two rice genotypes grown under one-year-old sengon stands experienced decreased productive tillers, plant height, stem strength, and the number and weight of grains per panicle. The IR 64 genotype decreased by 40.65% in grain weight per panicle, while the Situ Patenggang genotype experienced a 56.21% decrease.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Amin, I., Rasool, S., Mir, M. A., Wani, W., Masoodi, K. Z., & Ahmad, P. (2021). Ion homeostasis for salinity tolerance in plants: A molecular approach. Physiologia Plantarum, 171(4), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13185
Bhattacharya, A. (2021). Effect of Soil Water Deficit on Growth and Development of Plants: A Review. In Soil Water Deficit and Physiological Issues in Plants (pp. 393–488). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6276-5_5
Binkley, D., & Fisher, R. F. (2019). Ecology and management of forest soils. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.co.id/
BPS. (2022). Statistik Indonesia 2022. https://www.bps.go.id/
Danarto, S. A., Budiharta, S., & Fauziah, F. (2019). Tree species preference and rehabilitation perspective by local community: Case study in Bondowoso, East Java, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Forestry, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.13057/asianjfor/r030202
de Mendonça, G. C., Costa, R. C. A., Parras, R., de Oliveira, L. C. M., Abdo, M. T. V. N., Pacheco, F. A. L., & Pissarra, T. C. T. (2022). Spatial indicator of priority areas for the implementation of agroforestry systems: An optimization strategy for agricultural landscapes restoration. Science of The Total Environment, 839, 156185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156185
Dreccer, M. F., Condon, A. G., Macdonald, B., Rebetzke, G. J., Awasi, M.-A., Borgognone, M. G., Peake, A., Piñera-Chavez, F. J., Hundt, A., & Jackway, P. (2020). Genotypic variation for lodging tolerance in spring wheat: wider and deeper root plates, a feature of low lodging, high yielding germplasm. Field Crops Research, 258, 107942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107942
Duffy, C., Toth, G. G., Hagan, R. P. O., McKeown, P. C., Rahman, S. A., Widyaningsih, Y., Sunderland, T. C. H., & Spillane, C. (2021). Agroforestry contributions to smallholder farmer food security in Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 95(6), 1109–1124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00632-8
Dulbari, D., Santosa, E., Koesmaryono, Y., & Sulistyono, E. (2018). Pendugaan kehilangan hasil pada tanaman padi rebah akibat terpaan angin kencang dan curah hujan tinggi. Indonesian Journal of Agronomy, 46(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v46i1.14376
Dutta, S. S., Tyagi, W., & Rai, M. (2017). Physiological and molecular response to low light intensity in rice: A review. Agricultural Reviews, 38(3), 209–215. http://10.0.73.117/ag.v38i03.8980
Fischer, G., Almanza-Merchán, P. J., & Ramírez, F. (2012). Source-sink relationships in fruit species: A review. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, 6(2), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2012v6i2.1980
Franks, P. J., & Beerling, D. J. (2009). CO2?forced evolution of plant gas exchange capacity and water?use efficiency over the Phanerozoic. Geobiology, 7(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4669.2009.00193.x
Korneeva, E. A. (2022). Economic assessment and management of agroforestry productivity from the perspective of sustainable land use in the south of the Russian plain. Forests, 13(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020172
Kowalczewski, P. ?., Radzikowska, D., Ivanišová, E., Szwengiel, A., Ka?ániová, M., & Sawinska, Z. (2020). Influence of abiotic stress factors on the antioxidant properties and polyphenols profile composition of green barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(2), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21020397
Liu, Q., Wu, X., Chen, B., Ma, J., & Gao, J. (2014). Effects of Low Light on Agronomic and Physiological Characteristics of Rice Including Grain Yield and Quality. Rice Science, 21(5), 243–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6308(13)60192-4
Mattjik, A. A., & Sumertajaya, I. M. (2013). Design Experiment with SAS and Minitab Software. IPB Press, Bogor. [Indonesian].
Nair, P. K. R., Kumar, B. M., Nair, V. D., Nair, P. K. R., Kumar, B. M., & Nair, V. D. (2021). Definition and concepts of agroforestry. An Introduction to Agroforestry: Four Decades of Scientific Developments, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75358-0
Octavia, D., Suharti, S., Murniati, Dharmawan, I. W. S., Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., Supriyanto, B., Rohadi, D., Njurumana, G. N., Yeny, I., & Hani, A. (2022). Mainstreaming smart agroforestry for social forestry implementation to support sustainable development goals in Indonesia: A review. Sustainability, 14(15), 9313. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159313
Pan, Y., Cao, Y., Chai, Y., Meng, X., Wang, M., Wang, G., & Guo, S. (2023). Identification of photosynthetic parameters for superior yield of two super hybrid rice varieties: A cross-scale study from leaf to canopy. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, 1110257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1110257
Prakash, V., Lunagaria, M. M., Trivedi, A. P., Upadhyaya, A., Kumar, R., Das, A., Kumar Gupta, A., & Kumar, Y. (2023). Shading and PAR under different density agrivoltaic systems, their simulation and effect on wheat productivity. European Journal of Agronomy, 149, 126922. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126922
Raffo, A., Mozzanini, E., Ferrari Nicoli, S., Lupotto, E., & Cervelli, C. (2020). Effect of light intensity and water availability on plant growth, essential oil production and composition in Rosmarinus officinalis L. European Food Research and Technology, 246(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03396-9
Silitonga, T. S., Somantri, I. H., Daradjat, A. A., & Kurniawan, H. (2014). Guidelines for Characterization and Evaluation of Rice Plants. Center for Research and Development of Biotechnology and Agricultural Genetic Resources. Agricultural Research and Development Center. Ministry of Agriculture. [Indonesian].
Yetgin, A. (2023). Exploring the dynamic nature of root plasticity and morphology in the face of changing environments. Acta Ecologica Sinica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2023.07.008
Zhang, J., Li, G., Song, Y., Liu, Z., Yang, C., Tang, S., Zheng, C., Wang, S., & Ding, Y. (2014). Lodging resistance characteristics of high-yielding rice populations. Field Crops Research, 161, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.01.012

Most read articles by the same author(s)