Effect of genotype by environment interactions on quality parameters and grain yield of durum wheat
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Bouchetat F, Ghana R, Himour S, Bouaroudj S, Benfikh LA. 2023. Effect of genotype by environment interactions on quality parameters and grain yield of durum wheat. Biodiversitas 24: 5565-5571. Two experimental trials were conducted at different bioclimatic levels, with the aim to investigate the effect of genotype x environment (Gx E) interaction on grain yield and technological parameters of eight durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) varieties. The experiment was set up in a randomized complete block with three replications. The results showed a high Gx E effect on the expression of all evaluated traits. Varieties V4 and V1 with respectively, (24.95 q/ha and 24.73 q/ha) exhibited the highest average yield values across targeted environments. Averaged over the variety main effect, a significant difference of 42 q/ha, in favor of a humid environment, came out for yield. Varieties V3 (84.1 kg/hl) and V6 (83.36 kg/hl) demonstrated the best average specific weight values ??per hectolitre. Similarly, V2; V3; V5 and V7 had the highest rates of black point, while V2 shawled resistance to vitreous kernels (4.33 %). The V3 variety was strongly resistant to grain scalding (2.16 %). The highest levels of protein content were obtained in V6 and V4 (13.38 %; 13.3 %). Varieties: V3; V6 and V1 expressed the best wet gluten content (27.7 %; 26.15 % and 26.13 %). Indeed, the results obtained indicate that each variety is expressed by a particular behavior in relation to environmental diversity.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
AACC International. Method 38.12–02. 2000. Wet Gluten, Dry Gluten, Water Binding Capacity, and Gluten Index, Approved Methods of Analysis, 11th ed. AACC International, St. Paul, MN.
Agezew A, Melash É, Babett Á. 2022. Barriers and levers to enhance end-use functional properties of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) grain: An agronomic implication. Heliyon, 8: 2405-8440. DOI : org/10.1016/j.heliyon. 2022.e09542.
Ahmad, M. H & Sahar, Amna & Pasha, Imran & Khan, Muhammad & Imran, Muhammad & Muhammad, Niaz & Haider, Hafiz. 2022. Monitoring of wheat flour aging process using traditional methods and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics. International Journal of Food Properties 25:1513-1523. DOI: 10.1080/10942912.2022.2088789.
Alisa-N. Sieber, Tobias Würschum C, Friedrich H. 2015. Longin,Vitreosity, its stability and relationship to protein content in durum wheat, Journal of Cereal Science 61:71-77. DOI: org/10.1016/j.jcs.10.008.
Baillot N, Girousse C, Allard V, Piquet-Pissaloux A, Le Gouis J. 2018. Different grain-filling rates explain grain-weight differences along the wheat ear. PLoS One13: 0209597. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209597.
Bapela, Theresa, Hussein Shimelis, Toi John Tsilo et Isack Mathew. 2022. Amélioration génétique du blé pour la tolérance à la sécheresse : progrès, défis et opportunités. Plants 11: 1331. DOI.org/10.3390/plants11101331
Beres BL, Rahmani E, Clarke JM, Grassini P, Pozniak CJ, Geddes CM, Porker KD, May WE, Ransom JK. 2020. A Systematic Review of Durum Wheat: Enhancing Production Systems by Exploring Genotype, Environment, and Management (G × E × M) Synergies. Front Plant Sci.11:568-657. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.568657
Bicego B, Sapkota A, Torrion J.A. 2019. Differential nitrogen and water impacts on yield and quality of wheat classes. Agron. J.111: 2792-2803. DOI : org/10.2134/agronj2019.04.0283
Brankovic G, Dodig D, Pajic V, Kandic V, Kneževi? D, ?URI? N, ŽIVANOVI? T. 2018. Genetic parameters of bread wheat and durum wheat genotypes for technological quality properties in Serbia. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 105:39-48. DOI: 10.13080/z-a.2018.105.006
Brankovic Gordana R, Dejan D; Miroslav Z, Surlan-Momirovic, G, Dragicevic V, Duric N. 2014. Effects of climatic factors on grain vitreousness stability and heritability in durum wheat, Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38: 429-440. DOI:org/10.3906/tar-1308-51
Bretträger M, Scheibenzuber S, Asam S, Rychlik M, Gastl M, Becker Th. 2023. Evolution of Alternaria toxins during the brewing process and the usability of optical sorting methods to reduce mycotoxin concentrations in beer. European Food Research and Technology 249:1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-023-04241-w.
Chairi F, Aparicio N, Dolores Serret M, Luis Araus J. 2020. Breeding effects on the genotype × environment interaction for yield of durum wheat grown after the Green Revolution: The case of Spain, The Crop Journal 8: 623-634. DOI:org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.01.005
Clain J, Kathrin O.R. 2020. Practices to Increase Wheat Grain Protein. Available at Montana State University. https://landresources.montana.edu/soilfertility/documents/PDF/pub/NWhtProtEB0206.pdf
De Santis M.A, Giuliani M.M, Giuzio L, De Vita P, Lovegrove A, Shewry P.R. 2017. Differences in gluten protein composition between old and modern durum wheat genotypes in relation to 20th century breeding in ItalyEur. J. Agron. 87: 19-29. DOI: org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.04.003
Denis J.B, Piepho H.P, Van Eeuwijk F.A. 1997. Modelling expectation and variance for genotype by environment data. Heredity 79:162-171.
Directive BIPEA BY, 102.D.9302, Laboratory experimental milling for common wheat (http://www.bipea.org/)
Faostat. 2020. Statistical database of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available at 2020. http://faostat.fao.org . Accessed 30th Jun 2022
Gate B, Crosson P, Couvreur P. 1996. Mieux connaitre l’orge. Perspectives agricoles 100 : 18-23.
Hammami R, Reine B, Marie L, Bernard C. 2022. Durum Wheat Couscous Grains: An Ethnic Mediterranean Food at the Interface of Traditional Domestic Preparation and Industrial Manufacturing. Foods 11: 902.DOI:org/10.3390/foods11070902
Huanhui Z, Kejun G, Dongxiang G, Simei Z, Jingjing W. 2021. Quantifying the effect of low-temperature events on the grain quality formation of wheat, Journal of Cereal Science 100: 103257. DOI: org/10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103257
Husenov B, Asaad S, Muminjanov H, Gustavsson L, Johansson E. 2021. Sustainable Wheat Production and Food Security of Domestic Wheat in Tajikistan: Implications of Seed Health and Protein Quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 5751. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18115751.
ISO 11051:1994. Durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) — Specification
ISO 520:2010. Cereals and pulses — Determination of 1 000 grain mass (Reference method)
ISO 5532:1987. Durum wheat — Determination of proportion of non-wholly vitreous grains (Reference method)
ISO 7971-3:2019. Cereals — Determination of density, known as mass per hectolitre — Part 3: Practical method
Kariithi S, Abwao, S, John, N, Njau, P. 2016. Nutritional, Rheological and Organoleptic Properties of Whole Meal Flour Prepared from Stem Rust Resistant Wheat Varieties Released in Kenya. Wjar 4:173-182.DOI:10.12691/wjar-4-6-4
Khani M, Cheong J, Mrva K, Mares D.2018. Wheat black point: role of environment and genotype. J. Cereal Sci. 82: 25 – 33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.04.012
Khoa D, Petr K, Ivana C, Dagmar J, Magdalena L, Marek K, Phuong X. 2020. Comparative study on protein quality and rheological behavior of different wheat species. Agronomy 10: 1763. DOI.org/10.3390/agronomy10111763
Kondhare K.R, Farrell A.D, Kettlewell P.S, Hedden P, Monaghan J.M. 2015. Pre-maturity ?-amylase in wheat: the role of abscisic acid and gibberellins. J. Cereal. Sci. 63: 95-108. DOI.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2015.03.004
Krishnappa G, Ahlawat A, Shukla R.B, Singh S, Singh A, Singh G. 2019. Multi-environment analysis of grain quality traits in recombinant inbred lines of a biparental cross in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Cereal Research Communications 47:334-344. DOI:10.1556/0806.47.2019.02.
Lijalem G, Dejene K, Yemane T, Addis A, Dereje A. 2021. Variability among Ethiopian durum wheat genotypes grown under different climatic conditions of Tigray for some agronomic and grain-quality traits. J. Crop Improv 35 :1542-7528. DOI: 10.1080/15427528.2020.1806979
Lullien-Pellerin V. 2020. Both genetic and environmental conditions affect wheat grain texture: Consequences for grain fractionation and flour properties. Journal of Cereal Science 92: 102917.DOI.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2020.102917.
Mastanjevi? K, Habschied K, Dvojkovi? K, Karakaši? M, Glavaš H. 2023. Vitreosity as a Major Grain Quality Indicator—Upgrading the Grain-Cutter Method with a New Blade. Applied Sciences 13:2655. DOI:org/10.3390/app13042655
Mefleh M, Conte P, Fadda C, Giunta F, Piga A, Hassoun G, Motzo R. 2019. From ancient to old and modern durum wheat varieties: interaction among cultivar traits, management, and technological quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 99: 2059-2067. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9388
Melash A. A, Dejene K.M, Dereje A.A, Alemtsehay T.2019. The influence of seeding rate and micronutrients foliar application on grain yield and quality traits and micronutrients of durum wheat. J. Cereal. Sci. 85:221-227. DOI :10.1016/j.jcs.2018.08.005
Melash A. A. 2019. Factors affecting the storage grain protein content of tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.) and their management. Asian J. Crop Sci.4: 1-8. DOI : 10.9734/ajrcs/2019/v4i130058
Mohammadi R, Farshadfar E, Amri A. 2015. Interpreting genotype×environment interactions for grain yield of rainfed durum wheat in Iran. The Crop Journal 3: 526-535. DOI:org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.08.003.
Popovi? V, Ljubi?i? N, Kosti? M, Radulovi? M, Blagojevi? D, Ugrenovi? V, Popovi? D, Ivoševi? B. 2020. Genotype × Environment Interaction for Wheat Yield Traits Suitable for Selection in Different Seed Priming Conditions. Plants (Basel) 9:1804. DOI: 10.3390/plants 9121804.
Qiao-Yun Li, Qiao-Qiao Xu, Yu-Mei Jiang, Ji-Shan Niu, Kai-Ge Xu, Rui-Shi He. 2019. The correlation between wheat black point and agronomic traits in the North China Plain. Crop Protection 119: 17-23. DOI: org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.01.004.
Torrion J.A, Stougaard R.N. 2017. Impacts and limits of irrigation water management on wheat yield and quality. Crop Sci. 57 :3239–3251. DOI :10.2135/cropsci2016.12.1032
Visioli G, Bonas U, Dal C Cortivo, Pasini G, Marmiroli N, Mosca G, Vamerali T. 2018. Variations in yield and gluten proteins in durum wheat varieties under late-season foliar versus soil application of nitrogen fertilizer in a northern Mediterranean environment. J. Sci. Food Agric. 98: 2360-2369. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8727
Wan C, Dang P, Gao L, Wang J, Tao J, Qin X, Feng B, Gao J. 2022. How Does the Environment Affect Wheat Yield and Protein Content Response to Drought? A Meta-Analysis. Front Plant Sci.13: 896-985.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.896985.
Yadav G, Ellis R. 2017. Effects of rain shelter or simulated rain during grain filling and maturation on subsequent wheat grain quality in the UK. J. Agric. Sci. 155 :300-316. DOI : 10.1017/S0021859616000411