Economic value of forest ecosystems in the Nipa-Nipa Grand Forest Park, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Kasim S, Astuti T, Agarwal A, Hasddin, Fariki L, Sulistiyono N, Rustam LO, Asizah N, Saranani F, Ahmad. 2024. Economic value of forest ecosystems in the Nipa-Nipa Grand Forest Park, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 25: 4292-4303. The economic value of ecosystem services is crucial for development planning that prioritizes the sustainability of natural resources. Research aimed at determining the economic value of forest ecosystems is very important. The total economic value of this ecosystem is based on the number of tourist visits, utilization of water resources, and carbon absorption. The research was conducted in the Nipa-Nipa Grand Forest Park, Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. The research sample was 150 visitors selected using incidental techniques. The main data of the research used surveys and field measurements supported by secondary data. The TEV equation calculates the total economic value of forest ecosystem services. The monetary value of water resource environmental services is based on Household Water Value (NART), EWTP, and TWTP. The value of water resources for agricultural irrigation is calculated using the Water Value for Rice Agricultural Irrigation (NAUT) equation. The carbon absorption value is determined using the Carbon Uptake Value (CAV) equation. The total economic value of environmental services based on the number of visits, utilization of water resources, and carbon absorption capacity is IDR 186,742,287,967 per year or USD 11,694,269.91 per year. This value is equivalent to 40% of the GRDP of the forestry business sector in Southeast Sulawesi Province. Theoretically, this further emphasizes the importance of environmental services in the economy and human survival. Further research should focus on calculating the value of carbon absorption according to vegetation type and carbon stock to see the balance curve.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Ahmad R, Nurmawati KM, Kodir A. 2021. Water and conflict: The study of the availability of water resources in the Komodo National Park area. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 10: 337-350.
Alikhani S, Nummi P, Ojala A. 2021. Urban Wetlands: A review on ecological and cultural values. Water 13: 3301. DOI: 10.3390/w13223301.
Al-Saedi TK, Syakir MI. 2023. An overview of economic valuation of ecosystem services in protected areas and its roles in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 1167: 012052. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1167/1/012052.
Amirnejad H, Solout KA. 2021. Economic valuation of use values of environmental services in Lar National Park in Iran. J Agric Sci Technol 3: 237-252. DOI: 20.1001.1.16807073.2021.23.2.7.2.
Aoyama K, Yoshida T, Harada A, Noguchi M, Miya H, Shibata H. 2011. Changes in carbon stock following soil scarification of Nonwooded Stands in Hokkaido, Northern Japan. J For Res 16: 35-45. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-010-0204-y.
Armus R, Tumpu M, Tamrin T, Affandy NNA, Syam MA, Rustan FHFR, Mukrim MI, Mansida A. 2021. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Air. Yayasan Kita Menulis, Medan. [Indonesian]
Baral S, Basnyat B, Khanal R, Gauli K. 2016. A total economic valuation of wetland ecosystem services: An evidence from Jagadishpur Ramsar Site, Nepal. Sci World J 2016: 2605609. DOI: 10.1155/2016/2605609.
Batchelor D. 2018. The Climate Resilience Handbook: Strategies for Climate Resilience. Marsh and McLennan Companies, New York.
Bhat MY, Sofi AA. 2021. Willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation in Dachigam National Park, India. J Nat Conserv 62: 126022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126022.
Boni Y, Ariani WOR, Hasddin H. 2023. Study of environmental economic performance according to energy use and CO2 emissions, air quality, and government policies to achieve SDGs in Baubau City. Intl J Energy Econ Policy 13: 452-462. DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.14857.
Brill G, Shiao T, Kammeyer C, Diringer S, Vigerstol K, Ofosu-Amaah N, Matosich M, Müller-Zantop C, Larson W, Dekker T. 2021. Benefit accounting of nature-based solutions for watersheds. Guide united nations CEO Water Mandate and Pacific Institute. Oakland, California.
Brouwe R, Pinto R, Dugstad A, Navrud S. 2022. The economic value of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest ecosystem services: A meta-analysis of the Brazilian literature. PLoS One 17: e0268425. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268425.
Canu MD, Ghermandi A, Nunes PALD, Lazzari P, Cossarini G, Solidoro C. 2015. Estimating the value of carbon sequestration ecosystem services in the Mediterranean Sea: An ecological economics approach. Glob Environ Change 32: 87-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.008.
Cruz MAD, Nakamura S, Hanasak N, Boulange J. 2021. Integrated evaluation of changing water resources in an active ecotourism area: The case of Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines. Sustainability 13: 4826. DOI: 10.3390/su13094826.
Eger AM, Marzinelli EM, Beas-Luna R, Blain CO, Blamey LK, Byrnes JEK, Carnell PE, Choi CG, Hessing-Lewis M, Kim KY, Kumagai NH, Lorda J, Moore P, Nakamura Y, Pérez-Matus A, Pontier O, Smale D, Steinberg PD, Vergés A. 2023. The value of ecosystem services in global marine kelp forests. Nat Commun 14: 1984. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37385-0.
Ekayani M, Nuva, Pramudita D, Istiqomah A, Tampubolon BI, Osmaleli. 2019. Economic benefits of natural tourism: Driving community's participation for conservation in Halimun Salak National Park, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 285, IUFRO International and Multi-disciplinary Scientific Conference "Forest-related policy and governance: Analyses in the environmental social sciences". Bogor, 4-7 October 2016. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/285/1/012003.
Firmansyah I, Budiasa W, Paulus CA, Rahman DA, Sukwika T, Hermawan E, Casnan. 2023. Ecosystem services and environmental benefit values on Komodo Island and Padar Island in Komodo National Park, Indonesia. Environ Engineering Manag J 22: 1245-1257. DOI: 10.30638/eemj.2023.103.
Gössling S, Balas M, Mayer M, Sun YY. 2023. A review of tourism and climate change mitigation: The scales, scopes, stakeholders and strategies of carbon management. Tourism Manag 95: 104681. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104681.
Halleux V. 2017. Sustainable Tourism, The Environmental Dimension, Sustainable Tourism. Briefing, UE Member State.
Hasddin, Muthalib AA, Nggi E, Putera A. 2022. Metode analisis perencanaan dan pembangunan (paradigma penelitian, data kuantitatif-kualitatif, analisis kependudukan dan sosial, dan analisis ekonomi wilayah). Media Sains Indonesia, Bandung. [Indonesian]
Hasddin H. 2019. Valuasi ekonomi sumberdaya alam pada DAS Tiworo Kabupaten Muna Barat. Akrab Juara: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial 4: 115-125.
Haydir H, Ega AA, Saputr I, Sukri AS, Hasddin, H. 2023. Ketersediaan dan kebutuhan air daerah irigasi Ameroro Kabupaten Konawe. Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton 9: 633-645. DOI: 10.35326/pencerah.v9i3.3096.
Heagney EC, Rose JM, Ardeshiri A, Kovac M. 2019. The economic value of tourism and recreation across a large protected area network. Land Use Policy 88: 104084. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104084.
Huy H, Thi L, Khang N, Trinh N. 2023. Estimating the economic value of the ecotourism destination: The case of Tra Su Melaleuca Forest Natural Park in Viet Nam. J Geographical Institute Jovan Cvijic SASA 73: 379-386. DOI: 10.2298/IJGI2303379H.
Iasha A, Yacob MR, Kabir I, Radam A. 2015. Estimating economic value for potential ecotourism resources in Puncak Lawang Park, Agam Districtt, West Sumatera, Indonesia. Procedia Environ Sci 30: 326-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.058.
Indriasary A, Baco SL. 2017. Valuasi ekonomi jasa hidrologis taman Hutan Raya Nipa-Nipa. Ecogreen 3: 17-25. [Indonesian]
Junialdi R, Merina G. 2023. The economic value of mangrove forest ecotourism in Apar Village, Pariaman City, West Sumatra (nilai ekonomi ekowisata hutan mangrove di Desa Apar Kota Pariaman Sumatera Barat). Inovasia 2: 7-13. DOI: 10.58330/inovasia.v2i1.179.
Kauffman GJ. 2016. Economic value of nature and ecosystems in the Delaware River Basin. J Contemp Water Res Education 158: 98-119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1936-704X.2016.03222.x.
Kossoy A, Guigon P. 2012. State and Trends of The Carbon Market. Carbon Finance, at the World Bank. Washington, DC
Kusumaningsih DA, Suraningsih K, Nuryanti DS, Irawan A, Ximenes MB, Susilowati I. 2022. Study of economic value of water for domestic and agricultural uses in Grojogan Sewu nature tourism parkwater conservation. Wasian 9: 74-85. DOI: 10.20886/jwas.v9i1.6262
Lasco RD. 2002. Forest carbon budgets in Southeast Asia following harvesting and land cover change. Sci China 45: 55-64.
Li R, Wang Q, Liu Y, Jiang R. 2021. Per-capita carbon emissions in 147 countries: The effect of economic, energy, social, and trade structural changes. Sustain Prod Consum 27: 1149-1164. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.031.
Mariana M, Sari E, Jumiati J, Dinata M. 2016. Analisis potensi serapan karbon di Kawasan Arboretum Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Lancang Kuning. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan 10: 121-127. DOI: 10.31258/jil.10.2.p.121-127. [Indonesian]
Mehvar S, Filatova T, Dastgheib A, De-Ruyter Van Steveninck E, Ranasinghe R. 2018. Quantifying economic value of coastal ecosystem services: A review. J Mar Sci Eng 6: 5. DOI: 10.3390/jmse6010005.
Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia. 2023. Visits to natural tourism in conservation areas to increase in 2022. Press Release Number: SP. 008/HUMAS/PPIP/HMS.3/1/2023. [Indonesian]
Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia. 2024. Looking at visits to conservation areas in 2023. [Indonesian]
Mo L, Zohner CM, Reich PB, Liang J, De-Miguel S, Nabuurs GJ, Renner SS, van-Den Hoogen J, Araza A, Herold M, Mirzagholi L, Ma H, Averill C, Phillips OL, Gamarr JGP, Hordijk I, Routh D, Abegg M, Adou YC, et al. 2023. Integrated global assessment of the natural forest carbon potential. Nature 624: 92-101. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06723-z.
Nash J. 2021. Ekowisata: Mendorong Konservasi atau Menambah Eksploitasi?. PRB. [Indonesian]
Nasution SM, Purwoko A, Hartini KS. 2015. Analisis willingness to pay masyarakat terhadap mata air Aek Arnga di Desa Sibanggor Tonga, Kecamatan Puncak Sorik Marapi, Kabupaten Mandailing Natal. Peronema For Sci J 4: 230-239. [Indonesian]
Nurfatriani F. 2005. Nilai ekonomi kawasan yang direhabilitasi (hutan dan lahan) studi kasus proyek RHI, Kecamatan Nglipar Kabupaten Gunung Kidul, Prop. DI Yogyakarta. [Tesis]. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. [Indonesian]
Pache RG, Abrudan IV, Ni?? MD. 2020. Economic valuation of carbon storage and sequestration in Retezat National Park, Romania. Forests 12: 43. DOI: 10.3390/f12010043.
Pásková M, Štekerová K, Zanker M, Lasisi TT, Zelenka J. 2024. Water pollution generated by tourism: Review of system dynamics models. Heliyon 10: e23824. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23824.
Patterson MG, Cole AO. 2013. Total economic value of New Zealand's land-based ecosystems and their services. Value Ecosyst Services 3: 496-510.
Pérez DMG, Martín JMM, Martínez JMG, Sáez-Fernández FJ. 2020. An analysis of the cost of water supply linked to the tourism industry. an application to the case of the Island of Ibiza in Spain. Water 12: 1-19. DOI: 10.3390/w12072006.
Platania M, Rizzo M. 2018. Willingness to pay for protected areas: A case of Etna Park. Ecol Indic 93: 201-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.079
Rafif AD, Musthofa BM. 2019. Destination management amusement in Riau Province. J Indonesian Tourism Policy Stud 4: 1-7. DOI: 10.7454/jitps.v4i2.1075.
Rahmasari SN, Ridwan WA, Putri EIK. 2023. Economic valuation of Sumber Semen Nature Tourism Park in Rembang Regency. J Nat Resour Environ Manag 13: 444-453. DOI: 10.29244/jpsl.13.3.444–453.
Ramdas M, Mohamed B. 2014. Impacts of tourism on environmental attributes, environmental literacy and willingness to pay: A conceptual and theoretical review. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 144: 378-391. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.307.
Rodríguez-Tapia L, Revollo-Fernández DA, Morales-Novelo JA. 2017. Household's perception of water quality and willingness to pay for clean water in Mexico City. Economies 5: 12. DOI: 10.3390/economies5020012.
Rosaprana W, Kuncahyo B, Puspaningsih N. 2023. Carbon stock estimation on oil palm plantations and oil palm-based agroforestry in Gunung Mas Regency. Media Konservasi 28: 253-261. DOI: 10.29244/medkon.28.3.253-261.
Roslinda E, Yuliantini. 2014. The economic value of hydrological services in Mendalam sub-watershed, Kapuas Hulu Regency, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Indonesian J For Res 1: 1-8. DOI: 10.20886/ijfr.2014.1.1.1-8.
Roslinda E, Kartikawati SM, Rabudin. 2017. Economic valuation for tembawang ecosystem, in Sanggau Districtt, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 18: 1506-1516. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d180429.
Sanim B. 2011. Sumberdaya Air dan Kesejahteraan Publik: Suatu Tinjauan Teoritis dan Kajian Praktis. IPB Press, Bogor. [Indonesian]
Saputra AAA, Azis R, Sambari VEG, Hasddin, Sakti P, Maladeni ES, Haydir. 2022a. Perkiraan kebutuhan air bersih domestik sumber alami di perdesaan; studi di Desa Laramo, Kabupaten Konawe Utara. Shell Civil Eng J 8: 83-94. DOI: 10.35326/scej.v8i2.5140. [Indonesian]
Saputra AI, Limpato J, Kuswantoro H. 2022b. Carbon pricing and its monitoring system as a state revenue. Indonesian Treasury Review. Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara dan Kebijakan Publik 7: 207-223. DOI: 10.33105/itrev.v7i3.456.
Schiavon M, Giurea R, Ionescu G, Magaril E, Rada EC. 2022. Agro-tourism structures, SARS-CoV-2: The role of water. MATEC Web Conf 354: 00070. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/202235400070.
Sihite J. 2001. Evaluasi dampak erosi tanah model pendekatan ekonomi lingkungan dalam perlindungan DAS: Kasus Sub-DAS Besai DAS Tulang Bawang Lampung. [Disertasi]. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. [Indonesian]
Sugiana IP, Praptono T, Koropitan AF. 2024. Ecosystem carbon stock and annual sequestration rate from three genera-dominated mangrove zones in Benoa Bay, Bali, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 25: 287-299. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d250133.
Suhardono S, Hermawan B, Aulia ANA, Restanti AD, Ramadhan AWW, Septiariva IY, Sari MM, Suryawan IWK. 2024. Carbon sequestration and environmental service assessment in the special purpose forest Area of Mount Bromo, Indonesia. J Ecol Eng 25: 14-22. DOI: 10.12911/22998993/183534.
Suharti S, Darusman D, Nugroho B, Sundawati L. 2016. Economic valuation as a basis for sustainable mangrove resource management: A case in East Sinjai, South Sulawesi. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika 22: 13-23. DOI: 10.7226/jtfm.22.1.13.
Suparmoko S. 2008. Ekonomi Sumber Daya Alam dan Lingkungan (Suatu Pendekatan Teoritis). BPFE, Yogyakarta. [Indonesian]
Town of Aurora. 2013. The economic value of natural capital assets, associated with ecosystem protection. Aurora, Ontario. https:// www.aurora.ca/en/your-government/resources/Environment-and-Sustainability/AURORA---ECRA-CAP-ASSETS.pdf
Wang C, Su C, Li Z, Hu X. 2023. Waterfront ecotourism quality evaluation under the water ecological challenge in West Strait, China. Front Environ Sci 11: 1134905. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1134905.
Wheeler S, Xu Y, Zuo A, Haensch J, Seidl C. 2023. Identifying the water-related economic values of the Murray-Darling Basin and rating the quality of water economic studies. Report for the Murray-Darling Basin Authority. https://www.mdba.gov.au/publications-and-data/ publications/murray-darling-basin-outlook-literature-reviews.
Wihastuti L, Utama C. 2021. Economic valuation of a natural recreation area: The vulcanotour in Merapi Vulcano. Bina Ekonomi 23: 56-66. DOI: 10.26593/be.v23i1.4625.56-66.
World Travel and Tourism Council. 2022. Nature positive travel and tourism, travelling in harmony eith nature. Convention on Biological Diversity. https://wttc.org/Portals/0/Documents/Reports/2022/Nature-Positive-Travel-And-Tourism.pdf.
Yang J, Su K, Zhou Z, Huang Y, Hou Y, Wen Y. 2022. The impact of tourist cognition on willing to pay for rare species conservation: Base on the questionnaire survey in protected areas of the Qinling region in China. Glob Ecol Conserv 33: e01952. DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01952.
Yang L, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Zhang T, Meng H, Yan H, Shen Y, Li Z, Ma X. 2023. Wetland park planning and management based on the valuation of ecosystem services: A case study of the Tieling Lotus Lake National Wetland Park (LLNWP), China. Intl J Environ Res Public Health 20: 2939. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20042939.
Yoeti OA. 2016. Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Pariwisata. PT. Balai Pustaka, Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Zhang B, Imbulana, Arachchi J, Managi S. 2024. Forest carbon removal potential and sustainable development in Japan. Sci Rep 14: 647. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51308-z.
Zhao X, Youjun H, Chao Y, Danyun X, Wentao Z. 2019. Assessment of ecosystem services value in a National Park Pilot. Sustainability 11: 6609. DOI: 10.3390/su11236609.
Zhao N, Wang H, Zhong J, Sun D. 2022. Assessment of recreational and cultural ecosystem services value of islands. Land 11: 205. DOI: 10.3390/land11020205.