Family structure of F5 soybeans lines derived from soybean varieties with the main differences on seed size and maturity traits

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
DOI https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210630
Issue
Vol. 21 No. 6 (2020)
Section
Articles

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

HERU KUSWANTORO ♥
Indonesian Legume and Tuber Crops Research Institute, Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development. Jl. Raya Kendalpayak Km. 8, Malang 65162, East Java, Indonesia
RINA ARTARI
Indonesian Legume and Tuber Crops Research Institute, Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development. Jl. Raya Kendalpayak Km. 8, Malang 65162, East Java, Indonesia
RUDI ISWANTO
Indonesian Legume and Tuber Crops Research Institute, Indonesian Agency for Agricultural Research and Development. Jl. Raya Kendalpayak Km. 8, Malang 65162, East Java, Indonesia
HILYATUL IMANI
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Jl. Meranti, Kampus IPB Dramaga, Bogor 16680, West Java, Indonesia

Abstract

Abstract. Kuswantoro H, Artari R, Iswanto R, Imani H. 2020. Family structure of F5 soybeans lines derived from soybean varieties with the main differences in seed size and maturity traits. Biodiversitas 21: 2576-2585. The success of breeding programs depends on the availability of genetic resources with high genetic diversity. Genetic diversity plays a role in relationship between genotypes or within a group of genotypes. Seed size and the days to maturity are the main traits to develop a new superior variety for better seed quality and quantity. The plant materials consisted of eight F5 families originating from a combination of crossbreeding between four Korean soybean varieties (Daehwang, Daemang, Daewon, and Songhak) and two Indonesian soybean varieties (Argomulyo and Lawit). The main traits of four Korean soybean varieties are similar to each other, i.e. large seed size and early maturity. The two Indonesian soybean varieties differ on seed size and maturity. Argomulyo has a large seed size and early maturity, while Lawit has a small seed size and late maturity. Agronomic data, such as days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, days to harvesting, plant height, number of branches, number of reproductive nodes, number of filled pods, number of unfilled pods, seed yield per plant, 100 seeds weight, and seed yield per plot, were analyzed using R programs to form the groups. The grouping was based on principal component analysis. The results showed that the family structure of a cross was determined by the characteristics of the crossed genotypes. The family structures with Argomulyo as male parents were more influenced by 100 seeds weight, while the family structures with Lawit as male parents were more influenced by days to maturity. No family structure was formed with a large seed size on crossing with Lawit as the male parent. In this population, high seed yield as the main target of plant breeding was obtained on crossing of Daemang with Lawit.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Al-Hadi MAG, Islam MR, Karim MA, Islam MT. 2017. Morpho-physiological characterization of soybean genotypes under subtropical environment. Genetika 49(1): 297-311. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1701297A
Balitkabi. 2016. Description of Soybean Superior Variety. [in Indonesia]. Balai Penelitian Tanaman Aneka Kacang dan Umbi. http://balitkabi.litbang.pertanian.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/kedelai.pdf
Caverzan A, Giacomin R, Müller M, Biazus C, Lângaro NC, Chavarria G. 2018. How does seed vigor affect soybean yield components? Agronomy Journal 110(4): 1318-1327. doi:10.2134/agronj2017.11.0670
El-Hashash EF. 2016. Genetic diversity of soybean yield based on cluster and principal component analyses. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology 10(3):1-9.
Giordani W, Goncalves LSA, Moraes LAC, Ferreira LC, Neumaier N, Farias JRB, Nepomuceno AL, de Oliveira MCN, Mertz-Henning LM. 2019. Identification of agronomical and morphological traits contributing to drought stress tolerance in soybean [online]. Australian Journal of Crop Science 13(1): 35-44.
Gwinner R, Setotaw TA, Pasqual M, dos Santos JB, Zuffo AM, Zambiazzi EV, Bruzi AT. 2017. Genetic diversity in Brazilian soybean germplasm. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 17(4): 373-381.
Hakim L, Suyamto. 2017. Gene action and heritability estimates of quantitative characters among lines derived from varietal crosses of soybean. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science 18(1): 25–32.
He S, Wang Y, Volis S, Li D, Yi T. 2012. Genetic diversity and population structure: Implications for conservation of wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. Et Zucc) based on nuclear and chloroplast microsatellite variation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13(10):12608-12628
Hormichon S, Devi H. Nanita, Devi Th. Renuka, Devi T. Sunanda, Karam Nilima, Devi L. Sophia. 2018. Genetic Diversity among Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] Genotypes Based on Agro Morphological Characters under Rainfed Condition of Manipur. Climate Change and Environmental Sustainability 6(1): 41-45.
James AT, Yang AJ. 2016. Interactions of protein content and globulin subunit composition of soybean proteins in relation to tofu gel properties. Food Chemistry 194: 284-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.021
Krisdiana, R. 2007. Tempeh and tofu industry preferences to size and color of soybean seed. [in Indonesia]. Iptek Tanaman Pangan 2:123-130. http://pangan.litbang.deptan.go.id/iptek-pangan-418.html
Krisnawati A, Adie MM. 2015. Seleksi populasi F5 kedelai berdasarkan karakter agronomis. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon 1: 434-437.
Kumar S, Kumari V, V Kumar V. 2018. Assessment of genetic diversity in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] germplasm under North-Western Himalayas. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry7(2): 2567-2570.
Kurasch AK, Hahn V, Leiser WL, Starck N, Würschum T. 2017. Phenotypic analysis of major agronomic traits in 1008 RILs from a diallel of early European soybean varieties. Crop Science 57(2): 726-738. doi:10.2135/cropsci2016.05.0318
Kuswantoro H, Artari R, Rahajeng W, Ginting E, Supeno A. 2018. Genetic variability, heritability, and correlation of some agronomical characters of soybean varieties. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 10(1), 9-15.
Kuswantoro H, Sutrisno, Han WH, Lee PY, Cho YH, Baek IY. 2014. Performance of korean soybean varieties in Indonesia. Korean J. Int. Agric. 26(2): 107-113.
Kuswantoro H. 2017. Genetic variability and heritability of acid-adaptive soybean promising lines. Biodiversitas 18: 378-382.
Kuswantoro H. 2018. Effect of planting dates on growth, yield, and phenology of different soybean lines grown under tidal swamp land. Pertanika Jounal of Tropical Agricultural Science 41 (3): 1261 – 1274.
Kuswantoro H. 2019. Performance, similarity and genetic parameters of agronomical characters of soybean [Glycine max (L) Merrill.] germplasms. Agr. Nat. Resour. 53(3): 228-236. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.anres.2019.53.3.03
Liu Z, Li H, Wen Z, Fan X, Li Y, Guan R, Guo Y, Wang S, Wang D, Qiu L. 2017. Comparison of genetic diversity betwen Chinese and American soybean (Glycine max (L.)) accession revealed by high-density SNPs. Frontiers in Plant Science 8. 10.3389/fpls.2017.02014
Mahbub MM, Rahman MM, Hossain MS, Nahar L, Shirazy BJ. 2016. Morphophysiological variation in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill). American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 16(2): 234-238.
Malek MA, Rafii MY, Afroz SS, Nath UK, Mondal MMA. 2014. Morphological characterization and assessment of genetic variability, character assosiation, and divergence in soybean mutants. The Scientific World Journal: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/968796
Miranda C, Scaboo A, Cober E, Denwar N, Bilyeu K. 2020. The effects and interaction of soybean maturity gene alleles controlling flowering time, maturity, and adaptation in tropical environments. BMC Plant Biol 20(65). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-2276-y
Mofokeng MA, Mashingaidze K. 2018. Genetic differentiation of ARC soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] accessions based on agronomic and nutritional quality traits. Agriculture and Food Sciences Research 5(1): 6-22.
Salimi S, Lahiji HS, Abadi GM, Salimi S, Moradi S. 2012. Genetic diversity in soybean genotypes under drought stress condition using factor analysis and cluster analysis. Applied Scinces Journal 16(4):474-478.
Sreenivasa V, Lal SK, Talukdar A, Babu PK, Swamy HKM, Rathod DR, Yadav RR, Poonia S, Bhat KV, Viswanathan C. 2019. Evaluation of soybean germplasm lines for agro-morphological traits and terminal drought tolerance. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8(4): 105-127.
Sundaram P, Samineni S, Sajja SB, Roy C, Singh SP, Joshi P, Gaur PM. 2019. Inheritance and relationships of flowering time and seed size in kabuli chickpea Euphytica 215: 144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-019-2464-8
Suwa R, Matsumora K, Higa M, Jaiphong T, Gima S, Ono T, Uehara N, Watanabe K, Kawamitsu Y, Onaga Y, Miyazato S. 2018. Investigation of fundamental seed features of three Okinawa local soybean (Glycine max) varieties. Tropical Agriculture and Development 62(4 ): 167-176.
Teixeira, FG, Hamawaki OT, Nogueira AP, Hamawaki RL, Hamawaki CD, Mattos TP, Silveira IC, Medeiros LA. 2017. Inheritance of precocity and of agronomic characters in soybean. Genetics and Molecular Research 16(4): gmr16039842. https://www.geneticsmr.com/sites/default/files/articles/year2017/vol16-4/pdf/inheritance-of-precocity-and-of-agronomic-characters-in-soybean.pdf
Thakare DS, Chimote VP, Deshmukh MP, Bhailume MS, Adsul AT. 2017. Inheritance of yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill.) Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 8(1): 176-181.
Xavier A, Hall B, Casteel S, Muir W, Rainey KM. 2017. Using unsupervised learning techniques to assess interactions among complex traits in soybeans. Euphytica 213: 200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1975-4

Most read articles by the same author(s)