Genomewide SNP marker identification associated with drought tolerance in oil palm

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Dwi Yono
Yogo Adhi Nugroho
Zulfikar Achmad Tanjung
Condro Utomo
Tony Liwang

Abstract

Abstract. Yono D, Nugroho YA, Tanjung ZA, Utomo C, Liwang T. 2021. Genomewide SNP marker identification associated with drought tolerance in oil palm. Biodiversitas 22: 3138-3144. Drought stress is one of the abiotic stresses that frequently occurred in the oil palm plantation and has a negative impact on fresh fruit bunch (FFB) production.  Therefore, drought-tolerant palms are essential to be selected to mitigate this challenge. In Indonesia, several oil palm plantation areas have a dry climate, such as Lampung province.  Distinct yield performance palms were identified from well-recorded agronomic trials in these areas, where the palms are frequently exposed to drought stresses every year and lead them to suffer from water deficit response.  Group of high and low-yielding palms was selected based on FFB production of each palm for at least ten constitutive years. The double digest restriction amplified DNA (ddRAD) genotyping methods were used to capture the Single Nucleotide Polymorph (SNP) variant from pools of sample association datasets.  At least, 538k SNPs were identified from these pooled datasets. A bulked segregant analysis with a Case-Control approach was implemented to screen the contrast SNP profiles between both pools. A total of 56 association signals was selected from sequential filtering. These SNP sites are located in 21 genes. Further SNP validation and phenotypic verification are necessary to obtain SNPs marker for drought-tolerant palm selections.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
REFERENCES
Adam H, Collin M, Richaud F, et al. 2011. Environmental regulation of sex determination in oil palm?: current knowledge and insights from other species. Annals of Botany, 1–9. doi:10.1093/aob/mcr151
Amico-damião VD, and Carvalho RF. 2018. Cryptochrome-Related Abiotic Stress Responses in Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, 1897. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01897
Blum A. 2011. Drought resistance — is it really a complex trait?? Funct Plant Biol Drought resistance – is it really a complex trait?? Functional Plant Biology, 38, 753–757. doi:10.1071/FP11101
BPS. 2021. Jumlah Curah Hujan Provinsi Lampung, 2010-2017. lampung.bps.go.id, (https://lampung.bps.go.id/linkTableDinamis/view/id/71), 20Apr 2021.
Chuste P, Maillard P, Bréda N, et al. 2019. Sacrificing growth and maintaining a dynamic carbohydrate storage are key processes for promoting beech survival under prolonged drought conditions. Trees, 34(2), 381–394. doi:10.1007/s00468-019-01923-5
Cros D, Denis M, Sánchez L, et al. 2015. Genomic selection prediction accuracy in a perennial crop: case study of oil palm (. Theor Appl Genet, 128(3), 397–410. doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2439-z
Cros D, Flori A, Nodichao L, et al. 2013. Differential Response to Water Balance and Bunch Load Generates Diversity of Bunch Production Profiles Among Oil Palm Crosses (Elaeis guineensis). Tropical Plant Biol., 6, 26–36. doi:10.1007/s12042-013-9116-2
Cui K, Nie L, and Huang J. 2015. Drought stress condition increases root to shoot ratio via alteration of carbohydrate partitioning and enzymatic activity in rice seedlings. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 37(9). doi:10.1007/s11738-014-1760-0
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, et al. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27(15), 2156–2158. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330
Domenico S De, Bonsegna S, Horres R, et al. 2012. Transcriptomic analysis of oxylipin biosynthesis genes and chemical profiling reveal an early induction of jasmonates in chickpea roots under drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 61, 115–122.
Farooq M, Hussain M, Wahid A, et al. 2012. Drought Stress in Plants: An Overview. Plant Responses to Drought Stress, from Morphological to Molecular Features. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0
Golldack D, Li C, Mohan H, et al. 2014. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants?: unraveling the signaling networks. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00151
Haider MS, Zhang C, Kurjogi MM, et al. 2017. Insights into grapevine defense response against drought as revealed by biochemical , physiological and RNA-Seq analysis. Scientific Reports, 7. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-13464-3
Kim HB, Lee Y, Choe S, et al. 2011. Comprehensive analysis of AHL homologous genes encoding AT-hook motif nuclear localized protein in rice. BMB reports, 44(10). doi:10.5483/BMBRep.2011.44.10.680
Klaas M, Haiminen N, Grant J, et al. 2019. Transcriptome characterization and differentially expressed genes under flooding and drought stress in the biomass grasses Phalaris arundinacea and Dactylis glomerata. Annals of Botany, 124, 717–730. doi:10.1093/aob/mcz074
Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads , clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM, 00(00), 1–3.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, et al. 2009. The Sequence Alignment / Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25(16), 2078–2079. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Li M, Liang Z, Zeng Y, et al. 2016. De novo analysis of transcriptome reveals genes associated with leaf abscission in sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L . ). BMC Genomics, 1–18. doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2552-2
Liu Jinlong, Gao M, Lv M, et al. 2013. Structure , Evolution , and Expression of the ? -Galactosidase Gene Family in Brassica campestris ssp . chinensis. Plant Mol Biol Rep, 31, 1249–1260. doi:10.1007/s11105-013-0585-0
Liu Jun, Yang H, Lu Q, et al. 2012. PSBP-DOMAIN PROTEIN1, a Nuclear-Encoded Thylakoid Lumenal Protein, Is Essential for Photosystem I Assembly in Arabidopsis. The Plant cell, 24, 4992–5006.
Ma’rufah U, Hidayat1 R, and Prasasti I. 2017. Analysis of relationship between meteorological and agricultural drought using standardized precipitation index and vegetation health index. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 54(012008). doi:10.1088/1755-1315/54/1/012008
Mao J, Zhang Y, Sang Y, et al. 2005. A role for Arabidopsis cryptochromes and COP1 in the regulation of stomatal opening. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(34), 12270–12275. doi:10.1073/pnas.0501011102
Murugesan P, Aswathy GM, Sunil Kumar K, et al. 2017. Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) genetic resources for abiotic stress tolerance: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 87(5), 571–579.
Nugroho YA, Tanjung ZA, Yono D, et al. 2019. Genome-wide SNP-discovery and analysis of genetic diversity in oil palm using double digest restriction site associated DNA sequencing. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 293(1). doi:10.1088/1755-1315/293/1/012041
Osakabe Y, Yamaguchi-shinozaki K, Shinozaki K, et al. 2013. Sensing the environment?: key roles of membrane-localized kinases in plant perception and response to abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64(2), 445–458. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers354
Perrier X, and Jacquemoud-Collet JP. 2006. DARwin software. Montpellier. http://darwin.cirad.fr/
Prikryl J, Rojas M, Schuster G, et al. 2011. Mechanism of RNA stabilization and translational activation by a pentatricopeptide repeat protein. PNAS, 108(1), 415–420. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012076108
Prinsi B, Negri AS, Failla O, et al. 2018. Root proteomic and metabolic analyses reveal specific responses to drought stress in differently tolerant grapevine rootstocks. BMC plant biology, 18(126). doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1343-0
Sah SK, Reddy KR, and Li J. 2016. Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Front. Plant Sci., 7(571). doi:10.3389/fpls.2016.00571
Savchenko T V, Zastrijnaja OM, and Klimov V V. 2014. Oxylipins and Plant Abiotic Stress Resistance. Biochemistry (Moscow), 79(4), 362–375. doi:10.1134/S0006297914040051
Shih C, Chen H, Hsieh H, et al. 2019. Heterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein H1 Coordinates with Phytochrome and the U1 snRNP Complex to Regulate Alternative Splicing in Physcomitrella patens. The Plant cell, 31, 2510–2524. doi:10.1105/tpc.19.00314
Singh R, Low ETL, Ooi LC-L, et al. 2013. The oil palm SHELL gene controls oil yield and encodes a homologue of SEEDSTICK. Nature, 500(7462), 340–344. doi:10.1038/nature12356
Stare J. 2016. Odds Ratio, Hazard Ratio and Relative Risk. Metodolo?ski zvezki, 13(1), 59–67.
Taurino M, Domenico S De, Bonsegna S, et al. 2013. The Hydroperoxide Lyase Branch of the Oxylipin Pathway and Green Leaf Plant Biochemistry & Physiology The Hydroperoxide Lyase Branch of the Oxylipin Pathway and Green Leaf Volatiles in Plant / Insect Interaction. Plant Biochemistry & Physiology, 1(1). doi:10.4172/jpbp.1000102
Trenberth K. 2020. The Climate Data Guide: Nino SST Indices (Nino 1+2, 3, 3.4, 4; ONI and TNI), 1–2.
Wang C, Deser C, Yu J-Y, et al. 2017. El Niño and Southern Oscillation (ENSO): A Review, 8, 291–314. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7499-4
Wang L, Lee M, Ye B, et al. 2020. Genes, pathways and networks responding to drought stress in oil palm roots. Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-29882/v1
Wang Y, Zhang X, Huang G, et al. 2019. iTRAQ-based quantitative analysis of responsive proteins under PEG-induced drought stress in wheat leaves. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(11). doi:10.3390/ijms20112621
Xiong L, Wang R, Mao G, et al. 2006. Identification of Drought Tolerance Determinants by Genetic Analysis of Root Response to Drought Stress and Abscisic Acid. American Society of Plant Biologists, 142(November 2006), 1065–1074. doi:10.1104/pp.106.084632
Yono D, Purwanti E, Sahara A, et al. 2019. Physiology and genotyping of adaptive and sensitive oil palm progenies under unwatered stress condition Physiology and genotyping of adaptive and sensitive oil palm progenies under unwatered stress condition. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 293. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/293/1/012012

Most read articles by the same author(s)