A portrait of the ecological clusters in the urban fringe area of Surakarta, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

CYNTHIA PERMATA SARI
SIGIT HERU MURTI BUDI SANTOSA
DJOKO MARSONO
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3867-7538

Abstract

Abstract. Sari CP, Santosa SHMB, Marsono D. 2021. A portrait of the ecological clusters in the urban fringe area of Surakarta, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 23: 670-679. The population growth in Surakarta has led to agglomeration. To fulfill human needs, Surakarta has seen some major land-use changes across decades. The availability of natural resources and ecosystem services is very important for the sustainability of life. Biodiversity index-based area management is one of the best ways. Cluster methods will facilitate the planning, implementation and subsequent management of an area. This study divides the urban fringe of Surakarta into 48 ecological units. The biotic analysis of biodiversity index calculations is used to assess all ecological units. The value of the biodiversity indices is the basis for forming clusters. From the statistical analysis, 5 clusters were formed based on the level of similarity. The majority of the clusters were located in Karanganyar District. Cluster 3 was the cluster with the most members and the most value of the index of biodiversity. Cluster 2 had only 2 clusters. The range of biodiversity index in each cluster was not much different. The richness of the species in each cluster was in the medium-high range (tree level 0.945-4.500, saplings 0.908-4.889 and seedlings 0.638-4.440). The diversity of the species was at a moderate level with the tree level diversity index value of 2.044-2.290, saplings 1.610-2.294, seedlings 1.557-2.291 and was at a moderate level with the tree level index evenness value of 0.735-1.421, saplings 0.641-1.412, seedlings 0.730-1.645. In each cluster, the condition of the biodiversity was quite good and able to support the function and services of the ecosystem of urban areas and urban fringes. There was no dominance of plants, and the types were still diverse for the ecosystem stability. The development of Surakarta was faster in the south and the north. Biodiversity in eastern Surakarta was found to be more effective in supporting the ecosystem services of Surakarta City.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Axel Schicka, A., Porembskib , S., Hobsonc , P.R., Ibischa, P.L. 2019. Classification of key ecological attributes and stresses of biodiversity for ecosystem-based conservation assessments and management. Ecological Complexity (38) 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2019.04.001
Castro, A.J., Verburg, P.H., Martín-López, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Cabello, J., Vaughn, C.C., López, E. 2014. Ecosystem service trade-offffs from supply to social demand: A landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landscape Urban Plann (132) 102–110. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.009.
Chan, K., Balvanerab, P., Benessaiah, K., Chapman, M., Diaz, S., Gomez-Baggethune, E., Gould, R., Hannahs, N., Jax, K., Klain, S., Luck, G., Martin-Lopez, B., Muraca, B., Norton, B., Ott, K., Pascualo, U., Satterfield, T., Tadaki, M., Taggart, J., Turner, N., 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. PNAS 113, 1462–1465.
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M., 2017. Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 1–16.
Gregory Obiang Ndong , Olivier Therond , Isabelle Cousina.2020. Analysis of relationships between ecosystem services: A generic classification and review of the literature
Hugé , J., Rochettee ,A.J., de Béthunee , S., Paitanf , C.C.P., Vanderhaegeng, K., Vandervelden , T., Van Passelh , S., Vanhovel , M.P.M., Verbistg , B., Verheyene , D., Waasm, T., Janssens , I., de Bisthoven, L.J. 2020. Ecosystem services assessment tools for African Biosphere Reserves: A review and user-informed classification. Ecosystem Service (42) 101079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101079
Krebs CJ. Ecological methodology. Harper and Row press, New York, USA; 1989. p. 654
Morris, E.K., Caruso, T., Buscot, F., Fischer, M., Hancock, C., Maier, T.S., Meiners, T., Müller, C., Obermaier, E., Prati, D., Socher, S.A., Sonnemann, I., Wäschke, N., Wubet, T.,Wurst, S., Rillig, M.C.,. 2014. Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories.Ecology andEevolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1155
Yanga, Q., Liua, G., Giannettia, B.F., Agostinhoa, F., Almeidac, C.M.V.B., Casazz. M.. 2020. Emergy-based ecosystem services valuation and classification management applied to China’s grasslands. Ecosystem Service (42) 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101073
John W. Redhead a,b,* , Gary D. Powney a , Ben A. Woodcock a , Richard F. Pywell .2020. Effects of future agricultural change scenarios on beneficial insects . Journal of Environmental Managament.
Javiera Chinchilla a , Alexandre Carbonnel b,*, Mauricio Galleguillos. 2021. Effect of urban tree diversity and condition on surface temperature at the city block scale. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
Gregory Obiang Ndonga,? , Olivier Therondb , Isabelle Cousin. 2020. Analysis of relationships between ecosystem services: A generic
classifification and review of the literature. Ecosystem Service (43) : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101120
Yoshitaka Oishi. 2012.Inflfluence of urban green spaces on the conservation of bryophyte diversity: The special role of Japanese gardens
MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis, Washington, DC.
Han, Z., Song, W., Deng, X., Xu, X.. 2017. Trade-offffs and synergies in ecosystem service within the three-rivers headwater region, China. Water (9) 588. https://doi.org/10.3390/w9080588
IPBES, 2019. https://www.ipbes.net/glossary/ecosystem-services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity & Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany. Last accessed March 30, 2021.
Qing Yanga , Gengyuan Liua,b,? , Biagio F. Giannettia,c , Feni Agostinhoa,c , Cecília M.V.B. Almeidac, Marco Casazzad. 2020.Emergy-based ecosystem services valuation and classification management applied to China’s grasslands.