Stakeholders and network analyses in Tambora National Park, Sumbawa Island, Indonesia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Anshor M, Basuni S, Arief H, Sunarminto T. 2023. Stakeholders and network analyses in Tambora National Park, Sumbawa Island, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 24: 5446-5463. The complexity of managing Tambora National Park (Tambora NP), West Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia poses a challenge to be overcome effectively by Tambora NP Office alone, thus the involvement of broader stakeholders is needed. These stakeholders have their respective levels of influence and interests which affect the relationship between them and Tambora NP Office. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the stakeholders related to the management of Tambora NP, and investigate their interests and influence using social network analysis. A stakeholder analysis was conducted by the following steps: (i) identifying the stakeholders, (ii) mapping the stakeholders, and (iii) assessing the relationship among stakeholders. The analysis identified 38 stakeholders related to Tambora NP management. Tambora NP Office is the primary stakeholder with the highest level of influence and interest. The relationship established in the management network of Tambora NP is still weak and centralized among several stakeholders in which Tambora NP Office is the most central stakeholder. The relationship among stakeholders is dominated by five stakeholders, namely Tambora NP Office, Natural Resources Conservation Agency of West Nusa Tenggara (BKSDA NTB), Executive Board (DP) of Geopark Tambora, Forest Management Unit (KPH) Tambora and the Environment and Forestry Provincial Service of West Nusa Tenggara Province (Dinas LHK NTB). These five institutions also dominate the proximity between stakeholders, so the information flow is not evenly distributed to all stakeholders. The weak relationships among stakeholders could be overcome by enhancing the flow of information and communication which could be facilitated by Tambora NP Office, BKSDA NTB, and DP Geopark Tambora.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Abbas R. 2005. Mekanisme Perencanaan Partisipasi Stakeholder Taman Nasional Gunung Rinjani. [Dissertation]. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor. [Indonesian]
Adams WM, Hutton J. 2007. People, parks and poverty: Political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Soc 5 (2): 147-183.
Albert HJ. 2022. Protected area network expansion and management: Economics to improve conservation outcomes. Environ Resource Econ 83 (4): 955-972. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-022-00653-6.
Appleton MR, Courtiol A, Emerton L, Slade J, Tilker A, Warr LC, Malvido MÁ, Barborak JR, de Bruin L, Chapple R., Daltry JC, Hadley NP, Jordan CA, Rousset F, Singh R, Sterling EJ, Wessling EG, Long B. 2022. Protected area personnel and ranger numbers are insufficient to deliver global expectations. Nat Sustain 5 (12): 1100-1110. DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00970-0.
Balai TN Tambora (Tambora National Park Office). 2017. Tambora National Park Long Term Management Plan for the 2018-2027 Period. Balai TN Tambora, Dompu. [Indonesian]
Behringer W. 2017. Climate and history: Hunger, anti-semitism, and reform during the Tambora crisis of 1815-1820 In: Lederer D (eds). German History in Global and Transnational Perspective. Palgrave Pivot, London. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-53063-9_2.
Bennett NJ, Dearden P. 2014. Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Mar Pol 44: 107-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.017.
Berardo R, Heikkila T, Gerlak AK. 2014. Interorganizational engagement in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. J Public Adm Res Theory 24 (3): 697-719. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muu003.
Bitariho R, Akampurira E, Mugerwa B. 2022. Long-term funding of community projects has contributed to mitigation of illegal activities within a premier African protected area, Bwindi impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Conserv Sci Pract 4 (9): e12761. DOI: 10.1111/csp2.12761.
Bixler RP, Wald DM, Ogden LA, Leong KM, Johnston EW, Romolini M. 2016. Network governance for large-scale natural resource conservation and the challenge of capture. Front Ecol Environ 14 (3): 165-171. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1252.
Bodin Ö, Robins G, McAllister RRJ, Guerrero AM, Crona B, Tengö M, Lubell M. 2016. Theorizing benefits and constraints in collaborative environmental governance: A transdisciplinary social-ecological network approach for empirical investigations. Ecol Soc 21 (1): 40. DOI: 10.5751/ES-08368-210140.
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. 2002. Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, Massachusetts.
Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, Da Fonseca GAB. 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 80-291 (5501): 125-128. DOI: 10.1126/science.291.5501.125.
Cárcamo PF, Garay-Flühmann R, Gaymer CF. 2014. Collaboration and knowledge networks in coastal resources management: How critical stakeholders interact for multiple-use marine protected area implementation. Ocean Coast Manag 91: 5-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.01.007.
Chaffin BC, Gosnell H, Cosens BA. 2014. A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecol Soc 19: 56. DOI: 10.5751/ES-06824-190356.
Chung LW, Chao CL, Liao MC, Kao CW, Lu DJ. 2023. Effectiveness and appropriateness of core areas in an integrated protected area: A case study of Ecological Protected Areas in Yangmingshan National Park, Taiwan. Environ Sci Pol 145: 175-187. DOI: 10.1016/J.ENVSCI.2023.04.012.
Coelho JMG, Biju BP, Silva Neto EC da, Oliveira AL de, Tavares AA de O, Basso VM, Turetta APD, Carvalho AG de, Sansevero JBB. 2020. Improving the management effectiveness and decision-making by stakeholders’ perspectives: A case study in a protected area from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. J Environ Manag 272: 111083. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111083.
Eden C, Ackermann F. 1998. Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage Publications, London. DOI: 10.4135/9781446217153.
Feng C, Cao M, Wang W, Wang H, Liu F, Zhang L, Du J, Zhou Y, Huang W, Li J. 2021. Which management measures lead to better performance of China’s protected areas in reducing forest loss? Sci Tot Environ 764. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142895.
Freeman LC. 1979. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1: 215-239. DOI: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
Geldmann J, Coad L, Barnes M, Craigie ID, Hockings M, Knights K, Leverington F, Cuadros IC, Zamora C, Woodley S, Burgess ND. 2015. Changes in protected area management effectiveness over time: A global analysis. Biol Conserv 191: 692-699. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.08.029.
Geldmann J, Coad L, Barnes MD, Craigie ID, Woodley S, Balmford A, Brooks TM, Hockings M, Knights K, Mascia MB, McRae L, Brugess ND. 2018. A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Conserv Lett 11 (3): e12434. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12434.
Giglio VJ, Moura RL, Gibran FZ, Rossi LC, Banzato BM, Corsso JT, Pereira-Filho GH, Motta FS. 2019. Do managers and stakeholders have congruent perceptions on marine protected area management effectiveness? Ocean Coast Manag 179 March: 104865. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104865.
Gong M, Fan Z, Zhang X, Liu G, Wen W, Zhang L. 2017. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area management by comparing habitat utilization and threat dynamics. Biol Conserv 210: 253-260. dDOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.027.
Graham V, Geldmann J, Adams VM, Grech A, Deinet S, Chang H-C. 2021. Management resourcing and government transparency are key drivers of biodiversity outcomes in Southeast Asian protected areas. Biol Conserv 253: 108875. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108875.
Havard L, Brigand L, Cariño M. 2015. Stakeholder participation in decision-making processes for marine and coastal protected areas: Case studies of the south-western Gulf of California, Mexico. Ocean Coast Manag 116: 116-131. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.017.
Heslinga J, Groote P, Vanclay F. 2019. Strengthening governance processes to improve benefit-sharing from tourism in protected areas by using stakeholder analysis. J Sustain Tour 27 (6): 773-787. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2017.1408635.
Hockings M, Hardcastle J, Woodley S, Sandwith T, Wilson J, Bammert M, Valenzuela S, Chataigner B, Lefebvre T, Leverington F, Lopoukhine N, MacKinnon K, Londoño JM. 2019. The IUCN green list of protected and conserved areas: Setting the standard for effective area?based conservation. Parks 25 (2): 57-66. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PARKAS-25-2MH.en.
Ihsannudin, Antriyandarti E. 2022. Stakeholder participation in conservation of yellow-crested cockatoo (Cacatua sulphurea abbotti) and its habitat in Masakambing Island, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 23 (8): 3950-3959. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d230812.
Ilham QP, Purnomo H, Nugroho T. 2016. Analisis pemangku kepentingan dan jaringan sosial menuju pengelolaan multipihak di Kabupaten Solok, Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 21 (2): 114-119. DOI: 10.18343/jipi.21.2.114. [Indonesian]
Izurieta A, Sithole B, Stacey N, Hunter-Xenie, Campbell B, Donohoe P, Brown J, Wilson L. 2011. Developing indicators for monitoring and evaluating joint management effectiveness in protected areas in the Northern Territory, Australia. Ecol Soci 16 (3): 9. DOI: 10.5751/ES-04274-160309.
Jefferson J. 2014. Strategi Mobilisasi Pendanaan Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia.https://ksdae.menlhk.go.id/assets/publikasi/Buku_IBSAP%202015-2020.pdf. [Indonesian]
Katikiro RE, Kweka OL, Minja R, Namkesa F, Ponte S. 2021. Stakeholder engagement and conservation outcomes in marine protected areas: Lessons from the Mnazi Bay-Ruvuma Estuary Marine Park (MBREMP) in Tanzania. Ocean Coast Manag 2020: 105502. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105502.
KSDAE (Conservation of Natural Resources and Ecosystems Ministry of Environment and Forestry). 2020. Statistics of the Directorate General of Natural Resources and Ecosystem Conservation for 2019. Jakarta: Directorate General of KSDAE. [Indonesian]
Kusumawati I, Huang HW. 2015. Key factors for successful management of marine protected areas: A comparison of stakeholders? perception of two MPAs in Weh island, Sabang, Aceh, Indonesia. Mar Pol 51: 465-475. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.09.029.
Leverington F. 2010. A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness. Environ Manag 46: 685-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5.
Lucrezi S, Esfehani MH, Ferretti E, Cerrano C. 2019. The effects of stakeholder education and capacity building in marine protected areas: A case study from southern Mozambique. Mar Pol 108: 103645. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103645.
Mbaru EK, Barnes ML. 2017. Key players in conservation diffusion: Using social network analysis to identify critical injection points. Biol Conserv 210: 222-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.03.031.
Miller KR, Hamilton LS. 1999. Future steps. Parks 9 (3): 46-49.
Muntasib H, Rahayuningsih T, Aminsyah A. 2021. Identification of Stakeholders and Their Roles in Ecotourism Hazard Management in Mount Rinjani National Park. Media Konserv 26 (1): 28-35. DOI: 10.29244/medkon.26.1.28-35.
Nastran M. 2014. Stakeholder analysis in a protected natural park: Case study from Slovenia. J Environ Plan Manag 57 (9): 1359-1380. DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2013.808608.
Nita A, Ciocanea CM, Manolache S, Rozylowicz L. 2017. A social network approach to diagnose public participation in protected areas management insights from a natura 2000 case study. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2017, 771-774. DOI: 10.1145/3110025.3110124.
Nugroho AW, Sari UK. 2023. Stakeholder Identification for collaborative management of ecotourism and proboscis conservation. Intl J Conserv Sci 14 (2): 713-730. DOI: 10.36868/IJCS.2023.02.23.
Oldekop JA, Holmes G, Harris WE, Evans KL. 2016. A global assessment of the social and conservation outcomes of protected areas. Conserv Biol 30 (1): 133-141. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12568.
PATTIRO (Pusat Telaah dan Informasi Regional). 2020. Badan Layanan Umum Taman Nasional untuk Pengelolaan Kawasan Konservasi Berkelanjutan. PATTIRO, Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Pemprov NTB (West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government). 2016. Mount Tambora Geopark, Proposal Document to Become a National Geopark and Membership in the 2017 Indonesian National Geopark Network. Pemprov NTB. Mataram. [Indonesian]
Petursson JG, Kristofersson DM. 2021. Co-management of protected areas: A governance system analysis of Vatnajökull National Park, Iceland. Land 10 (7): 681. DOI: 10.3390/land10070681.
Powlen KA, Gavin MC, Jones KW. 2021. Management effectiveness positively influences forest conservation outcomes in protected areas. Biol Conserv 260: 109192. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109192.
Prayudi Y. 2020. Penerapan Tools Ucinet untuk Social Network Analysis guna mendapatkan pola interaksi manusia pada organisasi. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/29735/14523287BimoPratBim.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. [Indonesian]
Rasheed AR, Abdulla A. 2020. Evaluating stakeholder participatory processes in policy development for Marine Protected Areas. Mar Pol 112: 103737. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103737.
Rastogi A, Badola R, Hussain SA, Hickey GM. 2010. Assessing the utility of stakeholder analysis to Protected Areas management: The case of Corbett National Park, India. Biol Conserv 143 (12): 2956-2964. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.039.
Reed SM, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Huback K, Morris J, Prell CH, Quin CH, Stringer LC. 2009. Who‘s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resources management. J Environ Manag 30: 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
Rodrigues ASL, Cazalis V. 2020. The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness. Nat Commun 11 (1): 5147. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-18989-2.
Sabar A, Maulany RI, Yusran, Kurniawan A, Rahmatullah RA, Syam MA, Syawal MA, Halis A, Rafiadi MT. 2023. Stakeholder and social networks analysis of conservation partnership in Bantimurung Bulusaraung National Park, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 24 (2): 1017-1024. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d240242.
Sagie H, Orenstein DE. 2022. Benefits of Stakeholder integration in an ecosystem services assessment of Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel. Ecosyst Serv 53: 101404. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101404.
Saout LS, Hoffmann M, Shi Y, Hughes A, Bernard C, Brooks TM, Bertzky B, Butchart SHM, Stuart SN, Badman T, Rodrigues ASL. 2013. Protected areas and effective biodiversity conservation. Science 342 (6160): 803-805. DOI: 10.1126/science.1239268.
Sobhani P, Esmaeilzadeh H, Sadeghi SMM, Wolf ID, Deljouei A. 2022. Relationship analysis of local community participation in sustainable ecotourism development in protected areas, Iran. Land 11 (10): 1871. DOI: 10.3390/land11101871.
Stacey N, Izurieta A, Garnett ST. 2013. Collaborative measurement of performance of jointly managed protected areas in northern Australia. Ecol Soc 18 (1): 19. DOI: 10.5751/ES-05273-180119.
Sutawidjaja IS, Sigurdsson H, Abrams L. 2006. Characterization of volcanic deposits and geoarchaeological studies from the 1815 eruption of Tambora volcano. J Geosci 1 (1): 49-57. DOI: 10.17014/ijog.1.1.49-57.
Wasserman S, Faust F. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511815478.
Webb EL, Maliao RJ, Siar SV. 2004. Using local user perceptions to evaluate outcomes of protected area management in the Sagay Marine Reserve, Philippines. Environ Conserv 31 (2): 138-148. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892904001377.
Wells MP, McShane TO. 2004. Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. AMBIO: J Human Environ 33 (8): 513-519. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-33.8.513.
West P, Igoe J, Brockington D. 2006. Parks and peoples: The social impact of protected areas. Ann Rev Anthropol 35: 251-277. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308.
Wiratno W, Withaningsih S, Gunawan B, Iskandar J. 2022. Ecotourism as a resource sharing strategy: Case study of community-based ecotourism at the Tangkahan Buffer Zone of Leuser National Park, Langkat District, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland) 14 (6): 1-18. DOI: 10.3390/su14063399.
World Bank 1999. Report from the International Workshop on Community-Based natural Resource Management (CBNRM), Washington DC, 10-14 May 1998. http://www.worldbank.org/ wbi/conatrem/
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- DEDE AULIA RAHMAN, DONES RINALDI, WANDA KUSWANDA, RONDANG SIREGAR, FITRI NOOR CH, FAHMI HAKIM, HARNIOS ARIEF, HARYANTO R. PUTRO, Determining the landscape priority and their threats for the Critically Endangered Pongo tapanuliensis population in Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 20 No. 12 (2019)
- INSAN KURNIA, HARNIOS ARIEF, ANI MARDIASTUTI, RACHMAD HERMAWAN, The potential of bird diversity in the urban landscape for birdwatching in Java, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 22 No. 4 (2021)
- WAHYUDI ARIANTO, ERVIZAL A.M. ZUHUD, AGUS HIKMAT, TUTUT SUNARMINTO, ISKANDAR Z. SIREGAR, Genetic diversity of Amorphophallus titanum in Bengkulu, Indonesia based on RAPD markers , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 19 No. 5 (2018)
- YUDHA LESMANA, SAMBAS BASUNI, RINEKSO SOEKMADI, Ecosophy as a form of protection for the Tapanuli Orangutan (Pongo tapanuliensis) in the Batang Toru Landscape, North Sumatra, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 25 No. 11 (2024)