Vegetation diversity based on peat hydrological units for supporting cattle production in West Kalimantan, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

DUTA SETIAWAN
ANURAGA JAYANEGARA
NAHROWI
NUR ROCHMAH KUMALASARI

Abstract

Abstract. Setiawan D, Jayanegara A, Nahrowi, Kumalasari NR. 2024. Vegetation diversity based on peat hydrological units for supporting cattle production in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 25: 2011-2019. This study determined the characteristics of forage supply, composition, and diversity in various West Kalimantan Peat Hydrological Units (PHU) and the capacity for livestock development. The methods used were a combination of surveys, direct observations, and measurements of samples of peat hydrological units commonly used as pasture by farmers. The results showed that the pattern of providing forage for livestock is that the majority of farmers are in the productive age category (41-60 years), the education level was only elementary school, livestock farming was only a side business (78.33-81.67%), and the mowing capacity was still above livestock feed requirements. Important Value Index (IVI) in Mempawah Ageratum conyzoides (32.34%), Pontianak IVI Digitaria sanguinalis (27.17%), Kubu Raya IVI Cyperus brevifolius (22.43%). The forage species diversity index (H) of the three districts in West Kalimantan was classified as moderate or high. The species Richness Indices (R') for Mempawah, Pontianak, and Kubu Raya were 5.01, 6.22, and 6.41, respectively. The carrying capacity index in Kubu Raya (2.01) and Mempawah (5.19) was included in the safety criteria because it has a CCI above 2. In conclusion, The West Kalimantan livestock population can be increased by utilizing land in rice fields, dry fields, community forests, and plantations as a source of diverse forage vegetation.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Adnew W, Tsegay BA, Tassew A, Asmare B. 2018. Assessments of farmers? perception and utilization status of Brachiaria grass in selected areas of Ethiopia. Biodiversitas 19: 955-966. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d190326.
Birhan M, Adugna T. 2014. Livestock feed resources assessment, constraints and improvement strategies in Ethiopia. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 21 (4): 616-622. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.21.04.82406.
BPS-Statistics of Kalimantan Barat Province. 2022. Kalimantan Barat in Figures. Statistics of Kalimantan Barat Province, Pontianak.
Da Cunha SS, Ramos MB, de Almeida HA, Maciel MGR, de Souza SM, Pedrosa KM, de Faria LS. 2022. Vegetation cover and seasonality as indicators for selection of forage resources by local agro-pastoralists in the Brazilian semiarid region. Scientific Reports 12 (1): 15174. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18282-w.
Dwisutono, AN, Budi SW, Istomo D. 2019. Plant diversity in different land use types at the peat hidrological unit (PHU) of Mendahara–Batanghari river, Jambi province. Media Konservasi 24 (2): 141-151. DOI: 10.29244/medkon.24.2.141-151.
Ettu RO, Adegoke O, Olawumi AT. 2016. Socioeconomic analysis of cattle ownership status and management systems among rural farming households in Ijebu division, Orgun state. Ethiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technology 7 (2): 9-13.
Magurran AE. 1998. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Croom Helm Ltd, London, UK.
Moreno SA, Gamboa JAA, Ríos AM, Colin, PNO, Cordero JV, Pech PGG, Vázquez ATP. 2020. Influence of the composition and diversity of tree fodder grazed on the selection and voluntary intake by cattle in a tropical forest. Agroforestry Systems 94: 1651-1664. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-020-00483-9.
Nampanzira DK, Kabasa JD, Nalule SA, Nakalembe I, Tabuti JRS. 2015. Characterization of the goat feeding system among rural small holder farmers in the semi-arid regions of Uganda. SpringerPlus 4 (1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-0961-3.
Nell AJ, Rollinson DHL. 1974. The Requirement and Availability of Livestock Feed in Indonesia. UNDP Project INS/72/009, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Niderkorn V, Jayanegara A. 2021. Opportunities offered by plant bioactive compounds to improve silage quality, animal health and product quality for sustainable ruminant production: A review. Agronomy 11 (1): art. no. 86. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy11010086.
Parolo G, Abeli T, Gusmeroli F, Rossi G. 2011. Large?scale heterogeneous cattle grazing affects plant diversity and forage value of Alpine species?rich Nardus pastures. Grass and Forage Science 66 (4): 541-550. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00810.x.
Pepeta BN, Moyo M, Adejoro FA, Hassen A, Nsahlai IV. 2022. Techniques used to determine botanical composition, intake, and digestibility of forages by ruminants. Agronomy 12 (10): 2456. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy12102456.
Rahajoe JS, Alhamd L, Atikah TD, Pratama BA, Shiodera S, Kohyama TS. 2016. Floristic diversity in the peatland ecosystems of Central Kalimantan. In: Osaki M, Tsuji N (Eds). Tropical Peatland Ecosystems: 167-196. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-55681-7_11.
Rostini T, Djaya S, Adawiyah R. 2020. Analysis of forage for livestock in integrated and non-integrated cow and palm plantation. Jurnal Sains Peternakan Indonesia 5 (2): 155-161. DOI: 10.31186/jspi.id.15.2.155-161.
Salendu AH, Elly FH, Osak RE, Lumenta ID. 2018. Cattle farm development by forages cultivation on coconut land based on carrying capacity in West Bolangitang, Indonesia. International Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology 3 (3): 1139-1144. DOI: 10.22161/ijeab/3.3.54.
Suharlina, Astuti DA, Nahrowi, Jayanegara A, Abdullah L. 2016. Nutritional evaluation of dairy goat rations containing Indigofera zollingeriana by using in vitro rumen fermentation technique (RUSITEC). International Journal of Dairy Science 11 (3): 100-105. DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2016.100.105.
Yanza YR, Fitri A, Suwignyo B, Elfahmi, Hidayatik N, Kumalasari NR, Irawan A, Jayanegara A. 2021. The utilisation of tannin extract as a dietary additive in ruminant nutrition: A meta-analysis. Animals 11 (11): art. no. 3317. DOI: 10.3390/ani11113317.
Yoshihar Y, Okada M, Sasaki T, Sato S. 2014. Plant species diversity and forage quality as affected by pasture management and simulated cattle activities. Population Ecology 56 (4): 633-644. DOI: 10.1007/s10144-014-0443-4.

Most read articles by the same author(s)