Evaluation of water-saving rice status based on morphophysiological characteristics and water use efficiency

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

DIDI DARMADI
AHMAD JUNAEDI
DIDY SOPANDIE
SUPIJATNO
ISKANDAR LUBIS
KOKI HOMMA
NURIL HIDAYATI

Abstract

Abstract. Darmadi D, Junaedi A, Sopandie D, Supijatno, Lubis I, Homma K, Hidayati N. 2019. Evaluation of water-saving rice status based on morphophysiological characteristics and water use efficiency. Biodiversitas 20: 2815-2823. One strategy to anticipate water shortages in rice production is to use varieties that are efficient in using water and produce high yields. The aim of this study was to measure water consumption, water use efficiency and production performance of several types of rice. The research was conducted during the rainy season from January to April 2018 and the dry season from August to November 2018 in a greenhouse. This study used a completely randomized design. The genetic materials used were 8 varieties consisting of lowland rice (sawah), upland rice (gogo), and land race. The variables analyzed included morphological and physiological characteristics. The results showed that differences in rice types indicated diverse responses to morphological and physiological characteristics on water consumption and water use efficiency (WUE). Mentik Wangi variety had the highest water consumption of 24.1 liters. The IPB 9 G and Jatiluhur varieties achieved the highest water use efficiency of 2.4 and 2.3, respectively. Based on the heatmap analysis, both varieties had similarities in the morphological characteristics of long roots, high root weights, long and broad leaves, and high total grain counts per panicle. The similarity of physiological characteristics was high rates of photosynthesis and low transpiration. Varieties that achieve the highest water use efficiency have the potential to be developed into varieties that are tolerant to limited water conditions.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Akram H M, Ali A, Sattar A, Rehman H S U, Bibi A. 2013. Impact of water deficit stress on various physiological and agronomic traits of three basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. J Anim Plant Sci 23(5): 1415–1423.
Anshori MF, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, Ardie SW, Suwarno WB, Safitri H. 2018. Heritabilitas, karakterisasi, dan analisis clustergram galur-galur padi dihaploid hasil kultur antera. J. Agron. Indonesia. 46(2):119-125.
Bowers AJ. 2010. Analyzing the longitudinal K-12 grading histories of entire cohorts of students: grades, data driven decision making, dropping out and hierarchical cluster analysis. Practical Assessment. Res. Eval.15:1-18.
Centritto M, Lauteri M, Monteverdi M C, Serraj R. 2009. Leaf gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and grain yield in contrasting rice genotypes subjected to water deficits during the reproductive stage. J Exp Bot 60(8): 2325–2339.
Chauhan BS, Jabran K, Mahajan G. 2017. Rice Production Worldwide. Springer International Publishing AG. Switzerland.
Farooq M, Kobayashi N, Ito O, Wahid A, Serraj R. 2010. Broader leaves result in better performance of indica rice under drought stress. J Plant Physiol1 67(13): 1066–1075.
[FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2016. Rice market monitor. Volume XIX no 4. http://www.fao.org/economic/RMM [14 Januari 2019].
Hanifah A. 2017. Analisis Metabolomik dan Morfologi Beberapa Aksesi Terung (Solanum melongena L.). Thesis. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana IPB. Institut Pertanian Bogor. 57 p.
Hariyati NF, Murdiyarso D. 2004. Hubungan air tanaman Acasia mangium Willd, di Hutan Tanaman, Perum Perhutani Bogor. Jurnal Agromet 19 (2) : 13-23.
Hidayatullah A, Purwoko BS, Dewi IS, Suwarno WB. 2018. Agronomic performance and yield of doubled haploid rice lines in advanced yield trial. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 50(3):242-53.
IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 pp.
Jansson J, Willing B, Lucio M, Fekete A, Dicksved J, Tysk, Kopplin SP, Halfvarson J. 2009. Metabolomics reveals metabolic biomarkers of crohn’s disease. PLoS ONE. 7(4):1-10.
Lee JE, Recker AJ, Bowers M, Yuan. 2016. Hierarchical cluster analysis heatmaps and pattern analysis: an approach for visualizing learning management system intercation data. Proceeding of The 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining. North Corolina. USA.
Manikavelu A, Nadarajan N, Ganesh SK, Gnanamalar RP, Chandra BR. 2006. Drought tolerance in rice: Morphological and molecular genetic consideration. Plant Growth Regul, 50(2/3): 121–138.
Mostajeran A, Rahimi-Eichi V. 2009. Effects of drought stress on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars and accumulation of proline and soluble sugars in sheath and blades of their different ages leaves. Am-Eur J Agric Environ Sci 5(2):264–272.
Munawaroh L, Sulistyono E, Lubis I. 2016. Karakter morfologi dan fisiologi yang berkaitan dengan efisiensi pemakaian air pada beberapa varietas padi gogo. J. Agron. Indonesia 44 (1) : 1 – 7.
Reis AFB, Almeida REM, Lago BC, Trivelin PC, Linquist B, Favarin JL. 2018. Aerobic rice system improves water productivity, nitrogen recovery and crop performance in Brazilian weathered lowland soil. Field Crop. Res.218: p. 59–68.
Ritchie JT. 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: Discussion on the generaly relations between biomass production and evapotranspiration, In: Taylor H.M., W.R. Jordan, T.S. Sinclair (eds). Limitation to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. Amer. Soc. of Agron. Inc. Wisconsin. p. 29-44.
Santos CLd, Reis AfdB, Mazzafera P, Favarin JL. 2018. Determination of the water potential threshold at which rice growth is impacted. J. Plants 7(3):48.
Schonlau M. 2002. The clustergram : A graph for visualizing hierarchical and nonhierarchical cluster analyses. Stata J. 2:391-402.
Sharifi P, Aminpanah H, Erfani R, Mohaddesi A, Abbasian A. 2017. Evaluation of Genotype x Environment Interaction in Rice Based on AMMI Model in Iran. Rice Sci 24(3):173-80.
Sims DA dan Gamon JA. 2002. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sensing of Environment 81: 337– 354.
Supijatno, Chozin MA, Sopandie D, Trikoesoemaningtyas, Junaedi A, dan Lubis I. 2012. Evaluasi konsumsi air beberapa genotipe padi untuk potensi efisiensi penggunaan air. J Agron Indonesia. 40(1):15-20.
Sulistyono E, Suwarto, Ramdiani Y. 2005. Defisit Evapotranspirasi sebagai Indikator Kekurangan Air pada Padi Gogo (Oryza sativa L.). Bul. Agron 33 (1): 6 – 11.
Tripathy JN, Zhang JX, Robin S, Nguyen TT, Nguyen HT. 2000. QTLs for cell-membrane stability mapped in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought stress. Theor Appl Genet 100(8): 1197–1202.
Tuong TP, Bouman BAM. 2003. Rice production in water scarce environments. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D. 2003. Water productivity in agriculture: Limits and opportunities for improvements. Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture Series 1, CABI International, UK, pp. 53-68.
Venuprasad R, Impa SM, Vowda GRP, Atlin GN, Serraj R. 2011. Rice near-isogenic-lines (NILs) contrasting for grain yield under lowland drought stress. Field Crops Res 123(1): 38–46.
Wang JH, Geng LH, Zhang CM. 2012. Research on the weak signal detecting technique for crop water stress based on wavelet denoising. Adv Mat Res, 424/425: 966–970 .
Yuan J, Murphy A, Koeyer DD, Lague M, Bizimungu B. 2016. Effectiveness of the field selection parameters on potato yield in Atlantic Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 96:701-710.
Zimisuhara B, Valdiani A, Shaharuddin NA, Qamaruzzaman F, Maziah M. 2015. Structure and principal component analyses reveal an intervarietal fusion in Malaysia mistleteo fig (Ficus deltoidea Jack) population. Int. J. Mol. Sci 16:14369-14394.