Production efficiency of Inpago Unsoed-1 and Situbagendit rice farming in Central Java, Indonesia

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ALTRI MULYANI
DWIDJONO HADI DARWANTO
SRI WIDODO
MASYHURI

Abstract

Abstract. Mulyani A, Darwanto D, Widodo S, Masyuri. 2020. Production efficiency of Inpago Unsoed-1 and Situbagendit rice farming in Central Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 12: 3276-3286.  Inpago Unsoed-1 rice is a new superior rice variety that is not as familiar as Situbagendit variety for farmers in Indonesia. As one of the new superior rice variety, Inpago Unsoed-1 is expected to improve farm business efficiency so that it can increase farmers' income. This study was conducted to figure out the factors influencing the production of Inpago Unsoed-1 and Situbagendit rice in Province of Central Java, and to recognize the level of technical, allocative and economic efficiencies of Inpago Unsoed-1 and Situbagendit rice farming in Province of Central Java. Research sites included selected regencies in Province of Central Jawa, such as Banyumas, Purbalingga, and Cilacap. Meanwhile, the selected districts were Kalibagor (Banyumas); Kalimanah, Kemangkon, Bukateja, Kutasari, Kaligondang, and Bobotsari (Purbalingga); and Gandrungmangu (Cilacap). Data were collected by direct observation and interviews using semi-structured questionnaire. The sampling technique used non-probability sampling using a purposive sampling method. Data were collected during December 2018-May 2019, 147 farmers were sampled, consisting of 71 and 76 farmers for Inpago Unsoed-1 and Situbagendit, respectively. Data were analyzed by using Cobb-Douglas production function and function of Stochastic Frontier. The results showed that production factors of land acreage (ha) and P fertilizer (kg) positively affected the production of Inpago Unsoed-1 rice, whereas seeds (kg), N fertilizer (kg) and pesticide (l) had negative impact on its production. On Situbagendit rice production, the positive and negative effects were revealed by land acreage (ha) as well as pesticide (l) and N fertilizer (kg), respectively. Technical, economic, and allocative efficiencies on Inpago Unsoed-1 rice farming were 0.75, 0.65, and 0.88, respectively, which were higher than those of Situbagendit, i.e. 0.73, 0.54 and 0.75, respectively.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Asnah (2018) Efisiensi, Risiko dan Perilaku Risiko Usahatani Jagung dan Kacang Tanah dengan Aplikasi Biochar di Lahan Kering Blitar Selatan. Disertasi Ekonomi Pertanian. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta.

Bhattacharyya, AR. Mandal (2016) A Generalized Stochastic Production Frontier Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Rice Farming A Case Study From Assam, India. Indian Growth and Development review 9(2): 114-28.

Chang, H. Wen, F (2008) Off-farm Work, Technical Efficiency, and Production Risk: Empirical Evidence from National Farmer Survey in Taiwan. American Agricultural Economics ASSociation, Orlando, Florida, pp 269-278

Coelli, TJ (1996) A Guide to Frontier Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation. Center For Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. University of New England. Armidale. New South Wales.

Coelli, T, Rao, DSP, and Battese, GE (1998) An Introduction to efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Second., Springer US, Boston, MA, available at:https://doi.org/10/.1007/978-1-4615-5493-6.

Efani A, Soemarno, S Muhammad, N Hanani (2019) Technical Efficiency Evaluation of Tuna Fishing Biology using Stochastic Frontier Production Function. EurAsian Journal of Bioscience 13. 363-368.

Goyal (2010) Information, Direct Access to Farmers, and Rural Market Performance in Central India. American Economic Journal Applied Economics 2(3):22-45 · January 2010.https://doi.or/10.1257/app.2.3.22

Hanafie, R (2010) Pengantar Ekonomi Pertanian. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta. 229-233

Junaedi (2013) Efisiensi Produksi, Perilaku Petani dan daya saing Usahatani Kapas Rakyat di Sulawesi Selata. Disertasi Ekonomi Pertanian. UGM. Yogyakarta.

Kalirajan, KP (1996) Farm Spesific Technical Efficiencies and Development Policies. Journal of Econometrics Studies 11(1): 3-13

Kurniawan, AY, S Hartoyo, Syaukat (2008) Analisis Efisiensi dan Daya saing Usahatani Jagung pada Lahan Kering di Kabupaten Tanah Laut Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Forum Pascasarjana. 31(2): 93-103.

Kodde, DA, Palm, FC (1986) Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restriction. Econometrica. Vol 54 No. 5, pp 1243-1248

Lubis SN (2000). Adopis Teknologi dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. USU Press. Medan

Nguyen TT, Ngu VH, Seo B (2012) Cost and Environmental Efficiency of Rice Farm in South Korea. Agric. Econ. 43, 367-376.

Rasyid MN, B Setiawan, MM Mustadjab, N Hanani (2016) Factors that Influence Rice Production and Technical Efficiency in The Context of an Integrated Crop Management Field School Program. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 13 : 1201-1204.

Rinaldi, Jemmy, Suharyanto (2014) Analisis Risiko dan faktor yang Mempengaruhinya pada Usahatani Kakao di Bali. Prosiding Seminar Nasional: Kedaulatan Pangan dan Pertanian. 6 Desember 2014 : 637-642. Jurusan Sosek Pertanian.UGM. Yogyakarta.

Samarpitha, A., N. Vasudev, K. Suhasini (2016) Technical, economic and allocative efficiencies of rice farms in Nalgonda district of Telangana state. Economic Affairs 3:365-374

S. Chiona, Th. Khalinda, G. Tembo (2014) Stochastic Frontier Analysis of The Technical Efficiency of Smallhoder Maize Farmers in Central Province , Zamb. J. Agric. Sci 6 10.

Soekartawi (1994) Teori Ekonomi Produksi dengan Bahasan Analisis Cobb-Douglas. Raja Grafindo Perkasa. Jakarta.

Sukirno, S (2009) Mikro Ekonomi Teori Pengantar. Edisi Ketiga. Rajawali Press. Jakarta

Most read articles by the same author(s)