Consumer perceptions of stingrays in coastal areas of Indonesia
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Issue
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Nawastuti D, Darwanto DH, Mulyo JH, Suadi. 2023. Consumer perceptions of stingrays in coastal areas of Indonesia. Biodiversitas 24: 6844-6851. Stingray populations harvested for food may pose risks to food security and conservation goals. The purpose of this research is (i) to determine the type of fish product based on how consumers obtain the product, (ii) to determine the gender of consumers based on the type of product, and (iii) ii) to determine the type of fish product for consumption purposes. Primary data were collected from Google Forms and followed by interviews with selected households. The number of respondents was 125 people from Java Island, Timor Island, Sumba Island, Adonara Island, Lembata Island, Bangka Belitung Island and Flores Island. The information obtained was investigated using Chi-square analysis to understand consumer preferences for fish consumption using an adaptation of SPSS 25 programming. The results of the research show that there are two relationships, namely (i) the type of fish product has a significant relation to fishing, the way consumers fish, the fishery products they buy and (ii) consumer gender has a significant relationship with product type because male consumers find it easier to get stingrays by fishing so they are easier to consume individually, in groups, or to sell. A proper understanding of gender differences in stingray consumption can help determine the sustainability of stingray fisheries in a region because it can be known exactly who can access sustainable food. Although there are several types of stingrays that are protected, other types of stingrays should not be consumed. The results we obtained can be useful for increasing public awareness regarding the use of fish catching and its impact on the carrying capacity of fisheries in Indonesia.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Akinwehinmi O, Ogundari K, Amos TT. 2022. Consumers’ food control risk perception and preference for food safety certification in emerging food markets. J Agricult Econ 73 (3): 690-708. DOI: 10.1111/1477-9552.12474.
Ali L, Grey E, Singh D, Mohammed A, Tripathi V, Gobin J, Ramnarine I. 2020. An evaluation of the public’s knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) in Trinidad and Tobago regarding sharks and shark consumption. PloS One 15 (6): 1-24. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234499.
Andespa R. 2017. Hubungan perbedaan gender terhadap keputusan dalam membeli produk pakaian jadi. Open Science Framework 7 (6): 182-191. DOI: 10.31227/osf.io/a25wk. [Indonesian]
Arthatiani FY, Kusnadi N, Harianto H. 2018. Analysis of fish consumption patterns and fish demand model based on household’s characteristics in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan 13 (021): 73-86. DOI: 10.15578/jsekp.v13i1.6967. [Indonesian]
Benos T, Burkert M, Hüttl-Maack V, Petropoulou E. 2022. When mindful consumption meets short food supply chains: empirical evidence on how higher-level motivations influence consumers. Sustain Prod Consum 33: 520-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.028.
Birch D, Memery J. 2020. Exploring the influence of family on adolescents’ seafood consumption choices. Intl J Consumer Stud 44 (5): 499-510. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12581.
Booth H, Squires D, Yulianto I, Simeon B, Muhsin, Adrianto L, Milner-Gulland EJ. 2021. Estimating economic losses to small-scale fishers from shark conservation: a hedonic price analysis. Conserv Sci Pract 3 (9): 1-17. DOI: 10.1111/csp2.494.
Bostic SM, Sobal J, Bisogni CA. 2018. Social representations of fish and seafood among midlife rural adults: benefits, risks, and involvement. Food Pol 76: 99-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.03.010.
Bundy A, Chuenpagdee R, Boldt JL, de Fatima Borges M, Camara ML, Coll M, Diallo I, Fox C, Fulton EA, Gazihan A, Jarre A, Jouffre D, Kleisner KM, Knight B, Link J, Matiku PP, Masski H, Moutopoulos DK, Piroddi C, Raid T, Sobrino I, Tam J, Thiao D, Torres MA, Tsagarakis KM, Gro I, Shin YJ. 2017. Strong fisheries management and governance positively impact ecosystem status. Fish Fish 18 (3): 412-39. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12184.
Carrassón M, Soler-Membrives A, Constenla M, Escobar C, R. Flos, J. M. Gil, V. Luzón, F. Piferrer, L. Reig. 2021. Information impact on consumers’ perceptions towards aquaculture: Dismantling the myth about feeds for farmed fish. Aquaculture 544: 737137. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737137.
Chan CY, Tran N, Pethiyagoda S, Crissman CC, Sulser TB, Phillips MJ. 2019. Prospects and challenges of fish for food security in Africa. Glob Food Secur 20: 17-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2018.12.002.
Chang KC. 1977. Introduction: Food in Chinese Culture. New Haven, CT USA and London, UK.
Chlup R 2023. Conspiracy narratives as a type of social myth. Intl J Phys Cult Soc 1-23. DOI: 10.1007/s10767-023-09454-1.
Chu M, Anders S, Deng Q, Contador CA, Cisternas F, Caine C, Zhu Y, Shuyuan Y, Bo H, Zhiguang L, Lap Ah T, Hon Ming L. 2023. The future of sustainable food consumption in China. Food Energy Secur 12 (2): 1-16. DOI: 10.1002/fes3.405.
Croll DA, Dewar H, Dulvy NK, Fernando D, Francis MP. 2015. Vulnerabilities and fisheries impacts?: the uncertain future of manta and devil rays. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 26 (2016): 562-75. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.2591.
Daris L, Massiseng ANA, Fachri ME, Jaya J, Zaenab St.. 2022. The Impact of fishermen’s conflict on the sustainability of crab (Portunus pelagicus) resources in the coastal areas of Maros District, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 23 (10): 5278-89. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d231037
Dewar H. 2002. Preliminary report: manta harvest in Lamakera. Report from the Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research and the Nature Conservancy 3: 1-3.
Dulvy NK, Baum JK, Clarke S, Compagno LJV, Cortes E, Domingo A, Fordham S, Sarah F, Malcolm PF, Claudine G, Jimmy M, John AM, Alen S, John DS, Sarah V. 2008. You can swim but you can’t hide: the global status and conservation of oceanic pelagic sharks and rays. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 18: 459-82. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.
Fenner D. 2016. Criticism of marine protected areas by fisheries scientists. Mar Pollut Bull 108 (1-2): 12-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.026.
Firmansyah, Oktavilia S, Prayogi R, Abdulah R. 2019. Indonesian fish consumption: an analysis of dynamic panel regression model. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 246: 8-12. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/246/1/012005.
Godfray HCJ, Aveyard P, Garnett T, Hall JW, Key TJ, Lorimer J, Pierrehumbert RT, Scarborough P, Springmann M, Jebb SA. 2018. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science 361 (6399): 1-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.aam5324.
Haapasaari P, Ignatius S, Pihlajamäki M, Sarkki S, Tuomisto JT, Delaney A. 2019. How to improve governance of a complex social-ecological problem? Dioxins in baltic salmon and herring. J Environ Pol Plan 21 (6): 649-61. DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2019.1661236.
Hajdu F, Granlund S, Neves D, Hochfeld T, Amuakwa-Mensah F, Sandström E. 2020. Cash transfers for sustainable rural livelihoods? Examining the long-term productive effects of the child support grant in South Africa. World Dev Perspect 19: 100227. DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100227.
Hasan MdR, Chaplin JA, Spencer PB, Braccini M. 2023. Consumption of shark products: the interface of sustainability, trade (mis)labelling, human health and human rights. Fish Fish 2023: 777-95. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12768.
Hasrianti MA, Surianti, Putri ARS, Akbar AH. 2022. Analysis of nutritional content and heavy metals of suckermouth catfish (Pterygoplichthys pardalis) in Lake Sidenreng, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 23 (7): 3539-44. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d230729.
Hlophe SL, Ellis D. 2023. Changing consumer attitudes to make the corporate social responsibility investment in sustainable fish production a worthwhile investment to corporates. Corporate Soc Responsibility Environ 2023: 1-13. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2573.
Hoque MZ. 2021. Sustainability indicators for sustainably-farmed fish in Bangladesh. Sustain Prod Consumption 27: 115-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.020.
Hughner RS, Maher JK, Childs NM, Nganje WE. 2009. Fish: Friend or foe? Food policy and subpopulation warnings for consumers. Food Pol 34 (2): 185-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.09.002.
Irwin A, Geschke A. 2023. A consumption-based analysis of extinction risk in Australia. Conserv Lett 2022: 1-12. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12942.
Koehn JZ, Allison EH, Villeda K, Chen Z, Nixon M, Crigler E, Zhao L, Michelle C, Bapu V, Shakuntala HT, Joeri S, Christina CH, Neil A. 2022. Fishing for health: Do the world’s national policies for fisheries and aquaculture align with those for nutrition? Fish Fish 23 (1): 125-142. DOI: 10.1111/faf.12603.
Lacasse K. 2016. Don’t be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an ‘environmentalist’ label. J Environ Psychol 48: 149-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006.
Lawless S, Cohen PJ, Mangubhai S, Kleiber D, Morrison TH. 2021. Gender equality is diluted in commitments made to small-scale fisheries. World Dev 140: 105348. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105348.
Leavy P. 2017. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Edited by Patricia Leavy. The Guilford Press, New York and London.
Lopes IG, de Freitas TM. 2023. Fish consumption in Brazil: State of the art and effects of the covid-19 pandemic. Aquaculture 574: 739615. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739615.
Lucas E, Guo M, Guillén-Gosálbez G. 2021. Optimising diets to reach absolute planetary environmental sustainability through consumers. Sustain Prod Consumption 28: 877-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.07.003.
Ma?ecka A, Mitr?ga M, Pfajfar G. 2022. Segmentation of collaborative consumption consumers: social identity theory perspective. Intl J Consumption Stud 46 (6): 2445-65. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12798.
Manchanda P, Arora N, Nazir O, Islam JU. 2023. Cultivating sustainability consciousness through mindfulness: an application of theory of mindful-consumption. J Retail Consumer Serv 75 (July): 103527. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103527.
Mendoza JN, Mattalia G, Pr?se B, Kochalski S, Ciriaco A, Pieroni A, Sõukand R. 2021. Wild fish are a blessing’: Changes in fishing practices and folk fish cuisine around Laguna Lake, Northern Philippines. J Ethn Foods 8 (1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1186/s42779-021-00106-3.
Mojetta AR, Travaglini A, Scacco U, Bottaro M. 2018. Where sharks met humans: the Mediterranean Sea, history and myth of an ancient interaction between two dominant predators. Reg Stud Mar Sci 21: 30-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.rsma.2017.10.001.
Murphy R, Cunningham C, Harris BP, Brown C. 2021. Qualitative and quantitative fisher perceptions to complement natural science data for managing fisheries. Fisheries 46 (5): 209-19. DOI: 10.1002/fsh.10568.
Nahuelhual L, Saavedra G, Mellado MA, Vergara XV, Vallejos T. 2020. A social-ecological trap perspective to explain the emergence and persistence of illegal fishing in small-scale fisheries. Mar Stud 19: 105-17. DOI: 10.1007/s40152-019-00154-1.
Palacios-González MM, Chamorro-Mera A. 2021. Analysis of the predictive variables of socially responsible consumption. Business Strategy Dev 5: 187-96. DOI: 10.1002/bsd2.189.
Pangaribowo EH, Tsegai D, Sukamdi. 2019. Women’s bargaining power and household expenditure in Indonesia: the role of gender-differentiated assets and social capital. GeoJournal 84 (4): 939-60. DOI: 10.1007/s10708-018-9901-4.
Pattiselanno F, Apituley JRM, Arobaya AYS, Koibur JF. 2019. Short communication: using wildlife for local livelihood - experiences from the bird’s head peninsula, West Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20 (7): 1839-45. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d200708.
Pattiselanno F, Tokede MJ, Arobaya AYS, Mardiatmoko G, Pattiselanno AE. 2023. Hunting introduced species in Indonesia New Guinea. Biodiversitas 24 (5): 3045-50. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d240560.
Patton MQ. 2015. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 4th ed. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California.
Permana S, Partasasmita R, Iskandar J, Rohmatullayaly EN, Iskandar BS, Malone N. 2020. Traditional conservation and human-primate conflict in Ujungjaya Village community, Ujung Kulon, Banten, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 21 (2): 521-29. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d210213.
Rizaldo QV, Khaing WW, Belton B. 2023. Small fish consumption in rural Myanmar. Mar Stud 22 (2): 1-11. DOI: 10.1007/s40152-023-00304-6.
Rohe J, Schlüter A, Ferse SCA. 2018. A gender lens on women’s harvesting activities and interactions with local marine governance in a south pacific fishing community. Mar Stud 17 (2): 155-62. DOI: 10.1007/s40152-018-0106-8.
Rosenfeld DL, Tomiyama AJ. 2021. Gender differences in meat consumption and openness to vegetarianism. Appetite 166: 105475. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105475.
Roy A, Naskar M, Sinha A, Manna RK, Sahu SK, Ekka A, Das BK. 2023. Determinants Influencing fishermen’s willingness-to-participate and willingness-to-pay for conservation of small indigenous fishes: a model-based insight from Indian sundarbans. Front Sustain Food Syst 7: 1-10. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1215091.
Samhouri JF, Ramanujam E, Bizzarro JJ, Carter H, Sayce K, Shen S. 2019. An ecosystem-based risk assessment for california fisheries co-developed by scientists, managers, and stakeholders. Biol Conserv 231: 103-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.027.
Sampathkumar K, Yu H, Loo SCJ. 2023. Valorisation of industrial food waste into sustainable aquaculture feeds. Future Food 7: 100240. DOI: 10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100240.
Sarwono J. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta. [Indonesian]
Sasaki K. 2022. Diversity of Japanese consumers’ requirements, sensory perceptions, and eating preferences for meat. Anim Sci J 93 (1): 1-7. DOI: 10.1111/asj.13705.
Sawaki S, Taran D, Taran F, Bomoi R, Rumateray M. 2022. Hunting of wild animals by Saubeba community in Manokwari, West Papua, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 23 (5): 2411-2416. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d230519.
Schösler H, de Boer J, Boersema JJ, Aiking H. 2015. Meat and masculinity among young Chinese, Turkish and Dutch adults in the Netherlands. Appetite 89: 152-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.013.
Seidu I, Brobbey LK, Danquah E, Oppong SK, van Beuningen D, Seidu M, Dulvy NK. 2022. Fishing for survival: importance of shark fisheries for the livelihoods of coastal communities in Western Ghana. Fish Res 246: 106157. DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2021.106157.
Sievert K, Chen V, Voisin R, Johnson H, Parker C, Lawrence M, Baker P. 2022. Meat production and consumption for a healthy and sustainable Australian food system: Policy options and political dimensions. Sustain Prod Consumption 33: 674-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.007.
Tamiru M, Alkhtib A, Ahmedsham M, Worku Z, Tadese DA, Teka TA, Geda F, Burton E. 2023. Fish consumption and quality by peri-urban households among fish farmers and public servants in Ethiopia. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 23 (3): 498-506. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecohyd.2023.02.005.
Tandon A, Dhir A, Kaur P, Kushwah S, Salo J. 2020. Why do people buy organic food? the moderating role of environmental concerns and trust. J Retailing Consumer Serv 57: 102247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102247.
Teufer B, Grabner-Kräuter S. 2023. How consumer networks contribute to sustainable mindful consumption and well-being. J Consumer Affairs April: 757-84. DOI: 10.1111/joca.12536.
Tezzo X, Aung HM, Belton B, Oosterveer P, Bush SR. 2021. Consumption practices in transition: rural-urban migration and the food fish system in Myanmar. Geoforum 127: 33-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.09.013.
Vázquez-Rowe I, Villanueva-Rey P, Moreira MT, Feijoo G. 2013. The role of consumer purchase and post-purchase decision-making in sustainable seafood consumption: A Spanish case study using carbon footprinting. Food Pol 41: 94-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.04.009.
Wang Y, Neilson LC, Ji S. 2023. Mindfulness through Agency in health consumption: Empirical evidence from committed dietary supplement consumers. J Consumer Affairs 871-905. DOI: 10.1111/joca.12508.
Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B et al. 2019. Food in the anthropocene: the EAT-lancet commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393 (10170): 447-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4.
Zhao S, Cheah KSL. 2023. The challenges of Malaysian private universities in reaching sustainable education toward responsible consumption. Clean Responsible Consumption 10 (March): 100130. DOI: 10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100130.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- TIENNI MARIANA SIMANJORANG, IRHAM, LESTARI RAHAYU WALUYATI, JANGKUNG HANDOYO MULYO, Comparative and competitive advantages of nutmeg farming in two regions in Maluku Province, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 21 No. 3 (2020)
- RAKHMA FITRIA LARASATI, SUADI SUADI, EKO SETYOBUDI, Short Communication: Population dynamics of double-spined rock lobster (Panulirus penicillatus Olivier, 1791) in Southern Coast of Yogyakarta , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 19 No. 1 (2018)
- MATHEOS TALAKUA, SUADI, DJUMANTO, EKO SETYOBUDI, Record of Hemiramphus lutkei Valenciennes, 1847 from Seram Sea, Maluku, Indonesia with its molecular characterization , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 23 No. 3 (2022)
- ALTRI MULYANI, DWIDJONO HADI DARWANTO, SRI WIDODO, MASYHURI, Production efficiency of Inpago Unsoed-1 and Situbagendit rice farming in Central Java, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 21 No. 7 (2020)
- MATHEOS TALAKUA, SUADI, DJUMANTO, EKO SETYOBUDI, Length-weight relationship, condition factor, and reproductive aspects of Lutke's halfbeak Hemiramphus lutkei (Valenciennes, 1847) from Seram Sea, Maluku, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 24 No. 12 (2023)