Assessment of genetic diversity and characterization of distinctness, uniformity, and stability of newly bred sweet potato clones

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

YOSEP SERAN MAU
ANTONIUS S.S. NDIWA
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5647-7463
I G.B. ADWITA ARSA
GARVASILUS V. ASA
APRIANTO NANA
JESAYAS A. LONDINGKENE
EVERT YULIANES HOSANG
NOLDY RUSMINTA ESTORINA KOTTA
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9019-9751

Abstract

Abstract. Mau YS, Ndiwa ASS, Arsa IGBA, Asa GV, Nana A, Londingkene JA, Hosang EY, Kotta NRE. 2022. Assessment of genetic diversity and characterization of distinctness, uniformity, and stability of newly bred sweet potato clones. Biodiversitas 23: 5923-5934. Genetic diversity assessment is vitally important for germplasm management and the assembly of new varieties. This study aimed to 1) assess the genetic diversity and 2) characterize the distinctness, uniformity, and stability of newly bred clones and check varieties of sweet potatoes based on morphological characters. The present study was conducted in the experimental farm of Universitas Nusa Cendana for two cycles (years) in 2021 and 2022, involving 13 newly bred (hybrid) clones and 6 control varieties. The observations were made on morphological characters of leaf, vine, and storage root, including 31 characteristics. The observed characters were given scores based on the sweet potato descriptors of IPGBR and PPVTPP. The scored morphological data were subjected to cluster analysis followed by a Principal Component Analysis to reveal the genetic diversity level. Euclidean index was used to characterize the distinctness, while the variation of the scored morphological data was used to reveal the uniformity and stability of tested genotypes. The results revealed a high genetic diversity of the studied genotypes. The cluster analysis placed the studied genotypes into four clusters; cluster I consisted of only one genotype, cluster II comprised two sub-clusters and 13 genotype members, cluster II comprised two members, and cluster IV comprised two sub-clusters and three members. The first eight principal components were responsible for about 79% of the observed variability. Euclidean distance index revealed that each of the studied genotypes is distinct from others. No off-type plant was observed; thus, each of the tested genotypes was considered uniform. Phenotypic expressions of the studied genotypes were similar over the two growing cycles; thus, each is said to be stable. The newly bred genotypes G16 and G29 genotypes that meet the distinctness, uniformity, and stability criteria based on their highest number of distinctive characters are eligible for registration as new sweet potato varieties, more specifically for their unique purplish white and purple tuber flesh characters.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Angadi AP, Jagadeesha RC. 2018. Distinctness, uniformity and stability testing in Moringa- An overview. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. SP3: 30-34.
BALITKABI 2016. Deskripsi varietas unggul ubi jalar 1977-2016. Balai Penelitian Kacang-Kacangan dan Umbi-Umbian. Malang, Jawa Timur. [Indonesian].
BPS NTT. 2020. Harvest Area, Average Production, and Productivity of Sweet potato, 2009-2019. Central Bureau of Statistics of NusaTenggara Timur Province, Kupang, NTT. [Indonesian]
BPS Pusat. 2020. Statistics of Indonesia. Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics, Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Chanda M, Mukanga M, Mwala M, Osiru DS, MacRobert J. 2014. A comparative analysis of distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) data in discriminating selected Southern African maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 9 (41): 3056-3076.
CIP, AVRDC, IBPGR 1991. Descriptors for Sweet Potato. Huamab Z. (Ed.). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Rome, Italy.
de-Andrade EKV, de-Andrade Júnior VC, de-Laia ML, Fernandes JSC, Oliveira AJM, Azevedo AM. 2017. Genetic dissimilarity among sweet potato genotypes using morphological and molecular descriptors. Acta Scientiarum. 39 (4): 447-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v39i4.32847.
Elameen A, Larsen A, Klemsdal SS, Fjellheim S, Sundheim L, Msolla S, Masumba E, Rognli OA. 2011. Phenotypic diversity of plant morphological and root descriptor traits within a sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam., germplasm collection from Tanzania. Genet Resour Crop Evol 58: 397–407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-010-9585-1.
Fongod AGN, Mih AM, and Nkwatoh TN. 2012. Morphological and agronomical characterization of different accessions of sweet potatoe (Ipomoea batatas) in Cameroon. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science (IRJAS) 2(6): 234-245.
Gichuru V, Aritua V, Lubega GW, Edema R, Adipala E, Rubaihayo PR. 2006. A preliminary analysis of diversity among East African sweet potato landraces using morphological and simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers, Acta Hortic. 703: 159-164. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.703.18
Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4(1):1-9. Version 4.03. is available from: https://www.bytesin.com/software/PAST/.
Jördens R. 2005. Progress of plant variety protection based on the international convention for the protection of new varieties of plants (UPOV Convention). World Pat. Inf. 27: 232–243.
Karuri HW, Ateka EM, Amata R, Nyende AB, Muigai AWT, Mwasame E, Gichuki ST. 2010. Evaluating diversity among Kenyan sweet potato genotypes using morphological and SSR markers. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 12: 33–38.
Koussao S. Gracen V, Asante I, Danquah EY, Ouedraogo JT, Baptiste TJ, Vianney TM. 2014. Diversity analysis of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] Lam) germplasm from Burkina Faso using morphological and simple sequence repeats markers. African Journal of Biotechnology, 13(6): 729-742.
Laurie A, Thiart SM, Vorster HJ (2004) Sustainable production of root and tuber crops (potato, sweet potato, indigenous potato, cassava) in southern Africa. S. Afr. J. Bot. 70: 60-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30307-0.
Maquia I, Muocha I, Naico A, Martins N, Gouveia M, Andrade I, Goulao LF, Ribeiro AI. 2013. Molecular, morphological and agronomic characterization of the sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) germplasm collection from Mozambique: Genotype selection for drought-prone regions. South African Journal of Botany 88: 142-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2013.07.008.
Mau YS, Wadu MS, Ndiwa ASS, Markus JER, Arsa IGBA. 2021a. A screening of resistance to sweet potato weevil (Cylas formicarius Fab.) in a collection of sweet potato clones under laboratory conditions. Intl J Trop Drylands 5 (2): 41-47. DOI: 10.13057/tropdrylands/t050201/.
Mau YS, Ndiwa, ASS, Arsa IGBA. 2021b. Evaluasi Ketahanan Klon-klon hasil persilangan terhadap penyakit kudis (Sphaceloma batatas Saw.) pada musim kemarau. Laporan Penelitian, Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, Universitas Nusa Cendana. [Indoensian]
Mau YS, Ndiwa ASS, Markus JER, Arsa IGBA. 2019. Agronomic performance and drought tolerance level of sweet potato hybrids grown in Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 20(8): 2187-2196. DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d200812.
Mbithe MJ, Steven R, Agili S, Kivuva MB, Kioko WF, Eric K. 2016. Morphological Characterisation of Selected Ugandan Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L) Varieties for Food and Feed. J Phylogen Evolution Biol 4: 163. doi:10.4172/2329-9002.100016.
Nehra M, Kumar M, Vart D, Sharma RK, Choudhary M. 2016. DUS characterization and assessment of diversity in pearl millet inbreds. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 7(4): 925-933.
Norman PE, Aa B, Mj T, Beny M., Fomba SN. 2014. Agro-phenotypic characterization of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) genotypes using factor and cluster analyses. Agricultural Science Research Journal 4: 30-38.
Ochieng LA. 2019. Agro-Morphological Characterization of Sweet Potato Genotypes Grown in Different Ecological Zones in Kenya. J. Hortic. Plant Res. 5: 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/JHPR.5.1.
Patra N, Agrawal RC, Chawla HS. 2010. Assessment of distinctiveness, uniformity, and stability of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties based on morphological descriptors. Indian J. Genet. 70(1): 48-57.
PPVTPP 2021. Panduan Penyusunan Deskripsi Varietas Tanaman Pangan. Pusat Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman dan Perijinan Pertanian. Indonesian Ministry of Agriculture. Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Rao LVS, Prasad GS, Chiranjivi M, Chaitanya U, and Surendhar R. 2013. DUS Characterization for Farmer varieties of rice. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 4(5): 35-43.
Selvi D, Srimathi P, Senthil N, Ganesan K. 2013. Distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS) characterization on phenological traits and assessing the diversity of inbreds in maize (Zea mays L.). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 8(48): 6086-6092. DOI:10.5897/AJAR2013.7410.
Tairo F, Mneney E, and Kullaya A. 2018. Morphological and agronomical characterization of Sweet potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] germplasm collection from Tanzania. Int. j. plant breed. genet. 5 (12): 1-9.
UPOV. 2010. TG/258/1. E. Sweet Potato. UPOV Code: IPOMO_BAT. Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam). Guidelines for the Conduct of Tests for Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability. International Union for The Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Geneva, Switzerland.
UPOV 2019. General Introduction to the Examination of Distinctness, Uniformity and Stability and the Development of Harmonized Descriptions of New Varieties of Plants (document TG/1/3). International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. Geneva, Switzerland.
Yu J-K, Chung YS. 2021. Plant Variety Protection: Current Practices and Insights. Genes, 12, 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12081127