Vegetative morphophysiological responses of four rice cultivars to drought stress
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Issue
Section
Articles
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract. Miftahudin, Putri RE, Chikmawati T. 2020. Vegetative morphophysiological responses of four rice cultivars to drought stress. Biodiversitas 21: 3727-3734. Each rice genotype develops certain morphophysiological responses to drought stress. The study aimed to analyze the morphophysiological responses of vegetative aspect of four rice cultivars to drought stress. A 10% Polyethylene glycol-6000 was added to a Yoshida nutrient solution medium as a drought stress stimulant for four rice cultivars, i.e., IR64, Hawara Bunar, Situbagendit, and Inpago 10. Fourteen-days-old rice seedlings were grown on the media with and without drought stress treatment for 9 days, and morphophysiological characters of vegetative aspects were observed. Drought stress inhibited the shoot growth of cv. Hawara Bunar, but increased shoot growth of cv. Inpago 10. The physiological responses in the form of leaf relative water content, proline, malondialdehyde (MDA), and total chlorophyll contents in cv. Hawara Bunar was inversely proportional to those of cv. IR64 showed an inferior response to drought stress. The rice cv. Hawara Bunar might develop better response mechanisms to drought than that of cv. IR64. The physiological responses of cvs. Situbagendit and Inpago 10 were in between the other two cultivars. We conclude that the variation of morphophysiological responses to drought stress among rice cultivars is an indicator of tolerance capability to drought that could be used as early-growth selection criteria in rice breeding programs for drought tolerance.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
References
Barrs HD. 1968. Determination of water deficits in plant tissues. In: Kozolvski TT (ed).Water Deficits and Plant Growth. Academic Press, New York.
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205-207.
Bodner G, Nakhforoosh A, Kaul HP. 2015. Management of crop water under drought: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 401-442.
Borrell AK, Hammer GL, Henzell RG. 2000. Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop Sci 40: 1037-1048. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4041037x
Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443-448.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185-212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
Filippou P, Bouchagier P, Skotti E, Fotopoulos V. 2014. Proline and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species metabolism is involved in the tolerant response of the invasive plant species Ailanthus altissima to drought and salinity. Environ Exp Bot 97: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.010
Flexas J, Medrano H. 2002. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89: 183-189. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/aob/mcf027
Fu J, Huang B. 2001. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 45: 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-8472(00)00084-8
Hoque MA, Banu MNA, Okuma E, Amako K, Nakamura Y, Shimoishi Y, Murata Y. 2007. Exogenous proline and glycinebetaine increase NaCl-induced ascorbate–glutathione cycle enzyme activities, and proline improves salt tolerance more than glycinebetaine in tobacco Bright Yellow-2 suspension-cultured cells. Plant Physiol 164: 1457-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.10.004
Kage HM, Kochler M, Stützel H. 2004. Root growth and dry matter partitioning of cauliflower under drought stress condi-tions: Measurement and simulation. European J Agron 20: 379–394. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s1161-0301(03)00061-3
Lichtenthaler HK. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148: 350-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
Maggio A, Miyazaki S, Veronese P, Fujita T, Ibeas JI, Damsz B, Narasimhan ML, Hasegawa PM, Joly RJ, Bressan RA. 2002. Does proline accumulation play an active role in stress-induced growth reduction? Plant J 31: 699-712. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01389.x
McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. 1999. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80: 2581-2593. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2581:BAIPOO]2.0.CO;2
Mihara M, Uchiyama M, Fukuzawa K. 1980. Thiobarbituric acid value on fresh homogenate of rat as a parameter of lipid peroxidation in aging, CCl4 intoxication, and vitamin E deficiency. Biochem Med 23: 302-311. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0006-2944(80)90040-x
Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R, 2010. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33: 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
Ommen JOE, Donnelly A, Vanhoutvin S, van Oijen M, Manderscheid R. 1999. Chlorophyll content of spring wheat flag leaves grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and other environmental stresses within the ‘ESPACE-wheat” project. Europ J Agro 10: 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00011-8
Sacks MM, Silk WK, Burman P. 1997. Effect of water stress on cortical cell division rates within the apical meristem of primary roots of maize. Plant Physiol114: 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.2.519
Schonfeld MA, Johnson RC, Carver BF, Mornhinweg DW. 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci 28: 526-531. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021x
Shahbandeh M. 2020. Total global rice consumption 2008-2020. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/ 255977/total-global-rice-consumption/ [Accessed 19 April 2020].
Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG, Spollen WG, Springer GK, Bohnert HJ, Nguyen HT, 2004. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: Physiology to functional genomics. J Exp Bot 55: 2343-2351. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/erh276
Sheffield JB. 2007. ImageJ, a useful tool for biological image processing and analysis. Micros Microanal 13: 200-201.
Singh M, Kumar J, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad SM. 2015. Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14: 407-426. https:// http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8
Sinhababu A, Kar RK. 2003. Comparative responses of three fuel wood yielding plants to PEG-induced water stress at seedling stage. Act Physiol Plant 25: 403-409. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11738-003-0022-3
Yang X, Li X, Ren B, Ding L, Gao C, Shen Q, Guo S. 2012. Drought-induced root aerenchyma formation restricts water uptake in rice seedlings supplied with nitrate. Plant Cell Physiol 53: 495-504. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcs003
Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA. 1976. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. 3rd Ed. International Rice Research Institute. Philippine.
Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39: 205-207.
Bodner G, Nakhforoosh A, Kaul HP. 2015. Management of crop water under drought: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 401-442.
Borrell AK, Hammer GL, Henzell RG. 2000. Does maintaining green leaf area in sorghum improve yield under drought? II. Dry matter production and yield. Crop Sci 40: 1037-1048. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.4041037x
Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443-448.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443
Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185-212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
Filippou P, Bouchagier P, Skotti E, Fotopoulos V. 2014. Proline and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species metabolism is involved in the tolerant response of the invasive plant species Ailanthus altissima to drought and salinity. Environ Exp Bot 97: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.010
Flexas J, Medrano H. 2002. Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89: 183-189. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/aob/mcf027
Fu J, Huang B. 2001. Involvement of antioxidants and lipid peroxidation in the adaptation of two cool-season grasses to localized drought stress. Environ Exp Bot 45: 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0098-8472(00)00084-8
Hoque MA, Banu MNA, Okuma E, Amako K, Nakamura Y, Shimoishi Y, Murata Y. 2007. Exogenous proline and glycinebetaine increase NaCl-induced ascorbate–glutathione cycle enzyme activities, and proline improves salt tolerance more than glycinebetaine in tobacco Bright Yellow-2 suspension-cultured cells. Plant Physiol 164: 1457-1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.10.004
Kage HM, Kochler M, Stützel H. 2004. Root growth and dry matter partitioning of cauliflower under drought stress condi-tions: Measurement and simulation. European J Agron 20: 379–394. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/s1161-0301(03)00061-3
Lichtenthaler HK. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol 148: 350-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
Maggio A, Miyazaki S, Veronese P, Fujita T, Ibeas JI, Damsz B, Narasimhan ML, Hasegawa PM, Joly RJ, Bressan RA. 2002. Does proline accumulation play an active role in stress-induced growth reduction? Plant J 31: 699-712. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01389.x
McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS. 1999. Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80: 2581-2593. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2581:BAIPOO]2.0.CO;2
Mihara M, Uchiyama M, Fukuzawa K. 1980. Thiobarbituric acid value on fresh homogenate of rat as a parameter of lipid peroxidation in aging, CCl4 intoxication, and vitamin E deficiency. Biochem Med 23: 302-311. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0006-2944(80)90040-x
Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R, 2010. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33: 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x
Ommen JOE, Donnelly A, Vanhoutvin S, van Oijen M, Manderscheid R. 1999. Chlorophyll content of spring wheat flag leaves grown under elevated CO2 concentrations and other environmental stresses within the ‘ESPACE-wheat” project. Europ J Agro 10: 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00011-8
Sacks MM, Silk WK, Burman P. 1997. Effect of water stress on cortical cell division rates within the apical meristem of primary roots of maize. Plant Physiol114: 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.2.519
Schonfeld MA, Johnson RC, Carver BF, Mornhinweg DW. 1988. Water relations in winter wheat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci 28: 526-531. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183X002800030021x
Shahbandeh M. 2020. Total global rice consumption 2008-2020. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/ 255977/total-global-rice-consumption/ [Accessed 19 April 2020].
Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG, Spollen WG, Springer GK, Bohnert HJ, Nguyen HT, 2004. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: Physiology to functional genomics. J Exp Bot 55: 2343-2351. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jxb/erh276
Sheffield JB. 2007. ImageJ, a useful tool for biological image processing and analysis. Micros Microanal 13: 200-201.
Singh M, Kumar J, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad SM. 2015. Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 14: 407-426. https:// http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9372-8
Sinhababu A, Kar RK. 2003. Comparative responses of three fuel wood yielding plants to PEG-induced water stress at seedling stage. Act Physiol Plant 25: 403-409. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11738-003-0022-3
Yang X, Li X, Ren B, Ding L, Gao C, Shen Q, Guo S. 2012. Drought-induced root aerenchyma formation restricts water uptake in rice seedlings supplied with nitrate. Plant Cell Physiol 53: 495-504. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/pcp/pcs003
Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA. 1976. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. 3rd Ed. International Rice Research Institute. Philippine.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- MILDAWATI, SOBIR, SULISTIJORINI, TATIK CHIKMAWATI, The diversity of pteridophytes in Siberut National Park, Mentawai Islands, West Sumatra, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 21 No. 7 (2020)
- MILDAWATI, SOBIR, SULISTIJORINI, TATIK CHIKMAWATI, Diversity, distribution and ecology of Davallia in Sumatra (Indonesia) and the nearby small islands , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 23 No. 1 (2022)
- RURY ERYNA PUTRI, NISA RACHMANIA MUBARIK, LAKSMI AMBARSARI, ARIS TRI WAHYUDI, Antagonistic activity of glucanolytic bacteria Bacillus subtilis W3.15 against Fusarium oxysporum and its enzyme characterization , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 22 No. 9 (2021)
- Gunawan Gunawan, Sulistijorini Sulistijorini, Tatik Chikmawati, Sobir Sobir, Predicting suitable areas for Baccaurea angulata in Kalimantan, Indonesia using Maxent modelling , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 22 No. 5 (2021)
- I PUTU GEDE P. DAMAYANTO, HIMMAH RUSTIAMI, MIFTAHUDIN, TATIK CHIKMAWATI, A synopsis of Bambusoideae (Poaceae) in Lombok, Indonesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 21 No. 10 (2020)
- EKA SETIAWAN, MARLINA ARDIYANI, MIFTAHUDIN MIFTAHUDIN, AXEL DALBERG POULSEN, TATIK CHIKMAWATI, The diversity and distribution of Alpinia zerumbet clade in West Malesia , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 23 No. 4 (2022)
- ISNA AROFATUN NIKMAH, RUGAYAH RUGAYAH , TATIK CHIKMAWATI, Morphological and genetic variation in populations of Desmos chinensis Lour. (Annonaceae) , Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity: Vol. 22 No. 2 (2021)