Perceived biodiversity of fruit species for urban greenery in Indonesia: Case studies in Bogor, Jakarta, and Yogyakarta

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

ISMI PUJI RUWAIDA
EDI SANTOSA
ANAS DINURROHMAN SUSILA
WINARSO DRAJAD WIDODO
ADE WACHJAR
NIZAR NASRULLAH

Abstract

Abstract. Ruwaida IP, Santosa E, Susila AD, Widodo WD, Wachjar A, Nasrullah N. 2022. Perceived biodiversity of fruit species for urban greenery in Indonesia: Case studies in Bogor, Jakarta, and Yogyakarta. Biodiversitas 23: 3166-3177. Urban greenery planning considering biodiversity scenarios is still rarely studied in Indonesia. This study aims to demonstrate edible fruit species (FS) as the scenario for urban greenery based on interviews with citizens in Indonesian cities. The study was carried out in the cities that have implemented smart city models i.e., Bogor, Jakarta, and Yogyakarta-Indonesia. Interviews were conducted in July-December 2019, involving 420 respondents. The results showed that 77.7% of all respondents agreed with the planting of FS as city greenery. In total for all cities, there were 79 species belonging to 32 families mentioned by the respondents consisting of 41 commercial and 38 underutilized FS. Each respondent was able to mention between 20.4 and 22.8 fruit species, irrespective of city. The ability to mention fruit species was affected by the respondent’s background, especially exposure during childhood to FS, frequency as a domestic tourist, mobility mode, and frequency of visiting city parks. The rationale for selecting FS was the benefit of fruit as a food source, followed by the benefit of ecology, economy, aesthetics, and health. Based on the significant cultural index, mango ranked first as the most preferred commercial fruit species, followed by rambutan, rose apple, orange, papaya, starfruit, guava, avocado, sapodilla, and longan; and for underutilized FS were shoe-button, pinang, nam nam, mulberry, cactus, canistel, cherry, and pear. Value of species richness, Shannon-Wienner, and Simpson diversity indices of FS within a city ranged 0.97 to 1.06, 3.62 to 3.83, and 0.97, respectively. Biodiversity scenarios could be useful information in the greenery planning of smart cities to coop with evolving broader environmental services.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Amijaya SY. 2020. Evaluation of the principles of smart mobility and smart living in Jetisharjo Village, Yogyakarta (Evaluasi prinsip smart mobility dan smart living pada Kampung Jetisharjo Yogyakarta). SPACE: J Built Environ 7(1): 85-94. DOI: 10.24843/JRS.2020.v07.i01.p08. [Indonesian]
Araújo HCL, Martins FS, Cortese TTP, Locosselli GM. 2021. Artificial intelligence in urban forestry—A systematic review. Urban For Urban Greening 66: 127410. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127410.
Atmawidjaja ES, Sastra Z, Akbar NR. 2015. Study on Smart City Development in Indonesia (Kajian Pengembangan Smart City di Indonesia). Direktorat Jenderal Penataan Ruang Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta. 70p. [Indonesian]
Awaii T, Talla NVK. 2019. Comparison of fruit tree richness and abundance as an indicator of food resource availability for the endangered Tauraco bannermani in Mount Oku and Mount Mbam, Western Highlands of Cameroon. Int J Biol Chem Sci 13(3): 1332-1342. DOI: 10.4314/ijbcs.v13i3.10
BKP [Badan Ketahanan Pangan]. 2018. Food Security Index Indonesia 2018. Kementerian Pertanian. Available online http://bkp.pertanian.go.id/storage/app/media/Pusat%20Ketersediaan/Bidang%20Ketersediaan/Indeks%20Ketahanan%20Pangan%202018.pdf. [Indonesian]
BPS [Badan Pusat Statistik]. 2018. Bogor City in Figure 2018. BPS-Statistic of Bogor City. Available online https://bogorkota.bps.go.id/publication. [Indonesian]
BPS [Badan Pusat Statistik]. 2019. Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Province in Figure 2019. Available online https://yogyakarta.bps.go.id/publication. [Indonesian]
BPS [Badan Pusat Statistik]. 2022a. DKI Jakarta Province in Figures 2022. BPS-Statistics of DKI Jakarta Province. Available online https://jakarta.bps.go.id/publication. [Indonesian]
BPS [Badan Pusat Statistik]. 2022b. Jumlah Kunjungan Wisatawan ke Obyek Wisata Unggulan Menurut Lokasi di DKI Jakarta 2018-2020. Available online https://jakarta.bps.go.id/indicator/16/777/1/jumlah-kunjungan-wisatawan-ke-obyek-wisata-unggulan-menurut-lokasi-di-dki-jakarta.html
Carlyle-Moses DE, Livesley S, Baptista MD, Thom J, Szota C. 2020. Urban trees as green infrastructure for stormwater mitigation and use. In: Levia DF, Carlyle-Moses DE, Iida S, Michalzik B, Nanko K, Tischer A. (eds). Forest-Water Interactions. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis) Vol 240. Springer, Cham. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-26086-6_17
Cohen B. 2012. The top 10 smart cities on the planet. Available online https://www.fastcodesign.com/1679127/the-top-10-smart-cities-on-the-planet. (Accessed on 24 December 2021).
Conde BE, Ticktin T, Fonseca AS, Macedo AL, Orsi TO, Chedier LM, Rodrigues E, Pimenta DS. 2017. Local ecological knowledge and its relationship with biodiversity conservation among two Quilombola groups living in the Atlantic Rainforest, Brazil. Plos one 12(11): e0187599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187599
Da Silva VA, Andrade LHC, Albuquerque UP. 2006. Revisiting the Cultural Significance Index: the case of the Fulni-ô in Northeastern Brazil. Field Method 18(1): 98-108. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05278025.
Firmansyah Y. 2019. The application of the Jakarta Smart City concept to the improvement of public services in DKI Jakarta Province for 2014-2017. Public Adm J 3(2): 125-144. [Indonesian]
Fortes S, Hidalgo-Triana N, Sánchez-la-Chica JM, García-Ceballos ML, Cantizani-Estepa J, Pérez-Latorre AV, Baena E, Pineda A, Barrios-Corpa J, García-Marín A. 2021. Smart Tree: An architectural, greening and ICT multidisciplinary approach to smart campus environments. Sensors 21: 7202. DOI: 10.3390/s21217202
Gaines WL, Harrod RJ, Lehmkuhl JF. 1999. Monitoring biodiversity: quantification and interpretation. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-443. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 27 p.
Hakim AR. 2017. Profile of the potential tourism sector in DKI Jakarta Province. Available online https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329884947_Profil_Potensi_Sektor_Pariwisata_di_Provinsi_DKI_Jakarta [Indonesian]
Hassan AO, Isaac OU. 2018 Perception and attitude of urban dwellers on the uses of urban green infrastructure for climate change mitigation in developing Countries. (A case study of Lokoja Urban Centre). JECET Sec. A 7(3): 351-358. DOI: 10.24214/jecet.A.7.3.35158
Hofierka J, Gallay M, Ka?uk J, Šupinský J, Šašak J. 2017. High-resolution urban greenery mapping for micro-climate modelling based on 3D city models. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol XLII-4/W7, 12th 3D Geoinfo Conference 2017, 26–27 October 2017, Melbourne, Australia.
Iqbal M. 2020. The excitement of harvesting dates at the great mosque of Tasikmalaya (Keseruan Panen Pohon Kurma di Masjid Agung Tasikmalaya), Kamis 27 Februari 2020. Available online https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/keseruan-panen-pohon-kurma-di-masjid-agung-tasikmalaya.html. (Accessed on 18 August 2021). [Indonesian]
Irwan SNR, Sarwadi A. 2015. Productive homegarden landscapes in urban settlements toward sustainable built environment. Pp. ARS02: 1-11. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Saintek FT Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 17 November 2015, Jakarta. [Indonesian]
Judice A, Gordon J, Abrams J, Irwin K. 2021. Community perceptions of tree risk and management. Land 10(10): 1096. Doi: 10.3390/land10101096
Kirimtat A, Krejcar O, Kertesz A, Tasgetiren MF. 2020. Future trends and current state of smart city concepts: A survey. IEEE Access 8: 86448-86467. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992441.
Kummee P, Borisutpeth M, Chanlun S, Kanbutra P, Chanlun A. 2015. Efficacy of guava leaf extract as alternative pre-milking teat dipping in reducing teat–end bacterial load of milking dairy cows. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 7: 434-438.
Lohr VI. 2004. Effect of childhood experiences with nature, including planting trees, on adult understanding of trees in cities. Acta Hortic 643: 183-187. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.643.22
Lüttge U, Buckeridge M. 2020. Trees: Structure and function and the challenges of urbanization. Trees 2020: 1-8. DOI:10.1007/s00468-020-01964-1
Marsono. 2019. Agro and Tourism Villages: Profile of Tourism Villages in Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta and Central Java. GMU Press. [Indonesian]
Meinard Y, Coq S, Schmid B. 2019. The vagueness of “Biodiversity” and its implications in conservation practice. In: Casetta E, Marques da Silva J, Vecchi D (eds) From Assessing to Conserving Biodiversity. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, Vol 24. Springer, Cham. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-10991-2_17
Morar F, Peterlicean A. 2012. The role and importance of educating youth regarding biodiversity conservation in protected natural areas. Procedia Econ Finance 3: 1117-1121. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00283-3
Mutaqin DA, Muslim MB, Rahayu NH. 2021. Analysis of the forest city concept in the development plan of Capitol City. Bappenas Working Papers 4(1): 13-29. Doi: doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v4i1.87. [Indonesian]
Nowak DJ, Hirabayashi S, Bodine A, Greenfield E. 2014. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ Pollution 193: 119-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.05.028
Nowak DJ, Hirabayashi S, Doyle M, McGovern M, Pasher J. 2018. Air pollution removal by urban forests in Canada and its effect on air quality and human health. Urban For Urban Greening 29: 40-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.019
Pagan J. 2018. Smart cities: the next frontier. US Black Engineer Inform Tech 42(1): 78-80. Available online http://www.jstor.org/stable/26305582
Pauleit S, Jones N, Garcia-Martin G, Garcia-Valdecantos JL, Rivière LM, Vidal-Beaudet L, Bodson M, Randru TB. 2002. Tree establishment practice in towns and cities–Results from a European survey. Urban For Urban Greening 1: 83-96.
Petter J, Ries P, D’Antonio A, Contreras R. 2020. A tree selection survey of tree city USA designated cities in the Pacific northwest. Arbor Urban For 46(5): 371-384. DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2020.027
Purwasih H, Latifah S, Sukmana A. 2013. Identification of plant species at a few streets green belt of Medan City. Peronema For Sci J 2(2): 108-116.
Reid CE, Clougherty JE, Shmool JLC, Kubzansky LD. 2017. Is all urban green space the same? A comparison of the health benefits of trees and grass in New York City. Internat J Environ Res Public Health 14(11): 1411. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14111411
Roman LA, Catton IJ, Greenfield EJ, Pearsall H, Eisenman TS, Henning JG. 2021. Linking urban tree cover change and local history in a post-industrial city. Land 10: 403. DOI: 10.3390/land10040403
Rosiyanti AW, Susilowati MHD. 2017. The development of tourist attractions in Bogor District (Perkembangan objek wisata di Kabupaten Bogor). In 8th Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, Politeknik Negeri Bandung July 26-27, 2017. Bandung. Pp 462-469. [Indonesian]
Ruwaida IP, Widodo WD, Wachjar A, Susila AD, Nasrullah N, Santosa E. 2022. Understanding the selection of ornamental plants in Indonesian cities: gender preference and its background. Acta Hortic 1334: 353-362. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2022.1334.44
Sæbø A, Benedikz T, Randrup TB. 2003. Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries. Urban For Urban Greening 2(2): 101-114. DOI: 10.1078/1618-8667-00027.
Santosa E, Susila AD, Widodo WD, Nasrullah N, Ruwaida IP, Sari R. 2021. Exploring fruit tree species as multifunctional greenery: A case of its distribution in Indonesian cities. Sustainability 13(14): 7835. DOI: 10.3390/su13147835
Santosa E, Susila AD, Widodo WD, Nasrullah N. 2020. Genetic conservation of tree species in Indonesian cities: Problems and prospects. AIP Conf. Proc. 2260: 020022. DOI: 10.1063/5.0016192
SEP [Science for Environmental Policy]. 2012. The Multifunctionality of Green Infrastructure. March 2012. European Commission. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/docs/Green_Infrastructure.pdf (Accessed on 14 August 2021).
Shaheen H, Khan SM, Harper DM, Ullah Z, Qureshi RA. 2011. Species diversity, community structure, and distribution patterns in western Himalayan alpine pastures of Kashmir, Pakistan. Mountain Res Dev 31(2): 153-159.
Simberloff D. 2013. Introduced species, homogenizing biotas and cultures. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB. (Eds.) Linking Ecology and Ethics for a Changing World: Values, Philosophy, and Action. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, London. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7470-4.
Song P, Kim G, Mayer A, He R, Tian G. 2020. Assessing the ecosystem services of various types of urban green spaces based on i-Tree Eco. Sustainability 12(4): 1630. DOI: 10.3390/su12041630
Truong DD. 2021. Community awareness and participation in biodiversity conservation at Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, Vietnam. Biodiversitas 23: 583-594.
Turner-Skoff JB, Cavender N. 2019. The benefits of trees for livable and sustainable communities. Plants People Planet 1(4): 323–335. DOI:10.1002/ppp3.39
UN [United Nations]. 1992. Convention on biological diversity. Rio De Janeiro. Available online https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf
Ureta JU, Paola K, Evangelista A, Habito CMD, Lasco HR. 2016. Exploring gender preferences in farming system and tree species selection: perspectives of smallholder farmers in southern Philippines. J Environ Sci Manag Special Issue 1: 56-73.
Utami DK. 2019. Study of logging trees outside forest areas. [Undergraduate Thesis]. Universitas Jember, Jember. [Indonesian]
Wai K-M, Xiao L, Tan TZ. 2021. Improvement of the outdoor thermal comfort by water spraying in a high-density urban environment under the influence of a future (2050) climate. Sustainability 13(14): 7811. DOI: 10.3390/su13147811
Zulfikar, Arisoesilaningsih E, Indriyani S, Fernandes AAR. 2021. Biodiversity index of fruit trees cultivated by communities around marginal land in Jombang Regency, East Java Province, Indonesia. IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ Sci 743: 012049. DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/0120491

Most read articles by the same author(s)